BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To determine whether the information gathered from a fixed number of periodic verification films accurately reflects the true imprecision in patient positioning during the whole radiation therapy of early breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 204 medial and lateral treatment fields were evaluated in 102 breast cancer patients treated with conservative surgery and radiation therapy. For each treatment field, the central lung distance was measured on portal films obtained from one simulation and four treatment controls at weekly intervals during breast irradiation. Systematic and random errors in patient positioning throughout all treatment fractions were estimated from the available controls using Bayesian methods. RESULTS: The average systematic and random errors during treatment controls were 2.7 and 1.9 mm, respectively. For these mean control values, the probabilities that the true systematic and random errors remain below 5mm during all treatment fractions were 99 and 100%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Reproducibility of patient positioning was supported by a virtually null probability for systematic or random errors greater than 5 mm during the whole radiation therapy. Weekly verification films seem to be sufficient to estimate patient positioning errors with high accuracy in radiotherapy of early breast cancer.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To determine whether the information gathered from a fixed number of periodic verification films accurately reflects the true imprecision in patient positioning during the whole radiation therapy of early breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 204 medial and lateral treatment fields were evaluated in 102 breast cancerpatients treated with conservative surgery and radiation therapy. For each treatment field, the central lung distance was measured on portal films obtained from one simulation and four treatment controls at weekly intervals during breast irradiation. Systematic and random errors in patient positioning throughout all treatment fractions were estimated from the available controls using Bayesian methods. RESULTS: The average systematic and random errors during treatment controls were 2.7 and 1.9 mm, respectively. For these mean control values, the probabilities that the true systematic and random errors remain below 5mm during all treatment fractions were 99 and 100%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Reproducibility of patient positioning was supported by a virtually null probability for systematic or random errors greater than 5 mm during the whole radiation therapy. Weekly verification films seem to be sufficient to estimate patient positioning errors with high accuracy in radiotherapy of early breast cancer.
Authors: Clare Snyder; Brian W Pogue; Michael Jermyn; Irwin Tendler; Jacqueline M Andreozzi; Petr Bruza; Venkat Krishnaswamy; David J Gladstone; Lesley A Jarvis Journal: J Med Imaging (Bellingham) Date: 2018-01-02