Literature DB >> 15877806

United Network for Organ Sharing's expanded criteria donors: is stratification useful?

Edwina S Baskin-Bey1, Walter Kremers, Mark D Stegall, Scott L Nyberg.   

Abstract

The United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) Expanded Criteria Donor (ECD) system utilizes pre-transplant variables to identify deceased donor kidneys with an increased risk of graft loss. The aim of this study was to compare the ECD system with a quantitative approach, the deceased donor score (DDS), in predicting outcome after kidney transplantation. We retrospectively reviewed 49 111 deceased donor renal transplants from the UNOS database between 1984 and 2002. DDS: 0-39 points; >or=20 points defined as marginal. Recipient outcome variables were analyzed by ANOVA or Kaplan-Meier method. There was a 90% agreement between the DDS and ECD systems as predictors of renal function and graft survival. However, DDS identified ECD- kidneys (10.7%) with a significantly poorer outcome than expected (DDS 20-29 points, n = 5,252). Stratification of ECD+ kidneys identified a group with the poorest outcome (DDS >or=30 points). Predictability of early post-transplant events (i.e. need for hemodialysis, decline of serum creatinine and length of hospital stay) was also improved by DDS. DDS predicted outcome of deceased donor renal transplantation better than the ECD system. Knowledge obtained by stratification of deceased donor kidneys can allow for improved utilization of marginal kidneys which is not achieved by the UNOS ECD definition alone.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15877806     DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-0012.2005.00365.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Transplant        ISSN: 0902-0063            Impact factor:   2.863


  4 in total

1.  Intermediate-term outcomes with expanded criteria deceased donors in kidney transplantation: a spectrum or specter of quality?

Authors:  Robert J Stratta; Michael S Rohr; Aimee K Sundberg; Alan C Farney; Erica L Hartmann; Phillip S Moore; Jeffrey Rogers; Samy S Iskandar; Michael D Gautreaux; David F Kiger; William Doares; Teresa K Anderson; Gloria Hairston; Patricia L Adams
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Commercial renal transplantation: A risky venture? A single Canadian centre experience.

Authors:  Anil Kapoor; Kevin G Kwan; J Paul Whelan
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 1.862

3.  Use of marginal organs in kidney transplantation for marginal recipients: too close to the margins of safety?

Authors:  M Heuer; A Zeiger; G M Kaiser; Z Mathé; A Goldenberg; S Sauerland; A Paul; Jürgen W Treckmann
Journal:  Eur J Med Res       Date:  2010-01-29       Impact factor: 2.175

Review 4.  Challenges of organ shortage for transplantation: solutions and opportunities.

Authors:  R F Saidi; S K Hejazii Kenari
Journal:  Int J Organ Transplant Med       Date:  2014
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.