Literature DB >> 15877757

The effect of three different calcium phosphate implant coatings on bone deposition and coating resorption: a long-term histological study in sheep.

Christian Schopper1, Doris Moser, Walter Goriwoda, Farzad Ziya-Ghazvini, Else Spassova, Georgios Lagogiannis, Alexandra Auterith, Rolf Ewers.   

Abstract

The present study investigated the hypothesis that hydroxyapatite (HA), tricalcium phosphate (TCP), and a HA-gel coated on endosseous titanium (Ti) implants by spark discharging (SD) and dip coating would achieve predictable osseointegration without evident bioresorption of the coatings on the long term. A costal sheep model was used for the implantation of the HA/SD, HA/TCP/SD, and HA-gel/SD specimens, which were retrieved 6 and 12 months following implantation. HA and Ti coatings on implants obtained by conventional plasma spraying (HA/PS, Ti/PS) were used as controls. Microscopy showed that osseointegration was achieved from all types of implants. No evidence for bioresorption of the HA/SD, HA/TCP/SD, and HA-gel/SD coatings was present but cohesive failure with disruption of the coating/implant interface was seen. A statistical analysis of the histomorphometrical data showed no time-dependent effect, however. HA/PS coatings achieved significantly higher bone-implant contact (BIC) percentages of the total implant surface (toBIC) than the other types of coatings (P=0.01). If the BIC percentages were traced separately for implant portions placed into cortical and cancellous bone (coBIC and caBIC, respectively), detailed analysis showed that the caBIC values of HA-gel/SD and HA/PS coatings were significantly higher than that of the other types of coatings (P=0.01). CaBIC values were highly correlated with toBIC values (P<0.001). The present study showed that the preparation techniques used produced thin, dense, and unresorbable coatings that achieved osseointegration. Compared with the control coatings, however, only HA-gel/SD coating can be recommended from the investigated preparation techniques for a future clinical use if a better coating cohesion is achieved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15877757     DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01080.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res        ISSN: 0905-7161            Impact factor:   5.977


  5 in total

1.  The Effect of a Keratin Hydrogel Coating on Osseointegration: An Histological Comparison of Coated and Non-coated Dental Titanium Implants in an Ovine Model.

Authors:  Duncan I Campbell; Warwick J Duncan
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2013-02-01

2.  A histomorphometric study of dental implants with different surface characteristics.

Authors:  Hyun-Soon Pak; In-Sung Yeo; Jae-Ho Yang
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2010-12-31       Impact factor: 1.904

3.  Early bone growth on the surface of titanium implants in rat femur is enhanced by an amorphous diamond coating.

Authors:  Jarkko J P Jaatinen; Rami K Korhonen; Alpo Pelttari; Heikki J Helminen; Hannu Korhonen; Reijo Lappalainen; Heikki Kröger
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2011-04-20       Impact factor: 3.717

4.  The early loading of different surface-modified implants: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Kinga Körmöczi; György Komlós; Petra Papócsi; Ferenc Horváth; Árpád Joób-Fancsaly
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2021-04-26       Impact factor: 2.757

5.  Marginal bone level changes in association with different vertical implant positions: a 3-year retrospective study.

Authors:  Yeon-Tae Kim; Gyu-Hyung Lim; Jae-Hong Lee; Seong-Nyum Jeong
Journal:  J Periodontal Implant Sci       Date:  2017-08-14       Impact factor: 2.614

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.