Literature DB >> 15877622

Cooled needle catheter ablation creates deeper and wider lesions than irrigated tip catheter ablation.

Aravinda Thiagalingam1, Jim Pouliopoulos, Michael Anthony Barry, Anita C Boyd, Vicki Eipper, Teresa Yung, David L Ross, Pramesh Kovoor.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To design and test a catheter that could create deeper ablation lesions.
BACKGROUND: Endocardial radiofrequency (RF) ablation is unable to reliably create transmural ventricular lesions. We designed an intramural needle ablation catheter with an internally cooled 1.1-mm diameter straight needle that could be advanced up to 14 mm into the myocardium. The prototype catheter was compared with an irrigated tip ablation catheter.
METHODS: Ablation lesions were created under general anesthesia in 14 male sheep (weight 44 +/- 7.3 kg) with fluoroscopic guidance. Each of the catheters was used to create two ablation lesions at randomly allocated positions within the left ventricle. The irrigation rate, target temperature, and maximum power were: 20 mL/min, 85 degrees C, 50 W for the intramural needle catheter and 20 mL/min, 50 degrees C, 50 W for the irrigated tip catheter, respectively. All ablations were performed for 2 minutes. After the last ablation, blue tetrazolium (12.5 mg/kg) was infused intravenously. The heart was removed via a left thoracotomy after monitoring the sheep for one hour.
RESULTS: There was no evidence of cardiac tamponade in any sheep. The intramural needle catheter lesions were significantly wider (10.9 +/- 2.8 mm vs 10.1 +/- 2.4 mm, P = 0.01), deeper (9.6 +/- 2.0 mm vs 7.0 +/- 1.3 mm, P = 0.01), and more likely to be transmural (38% vs 0%, P = 0.03).
CONCLUSIONS: Cooled intramural needle ablation creates lesions that are significantly deeper and wider than endocardial RF ablation using an irrigated tip catheter in sheep hearts. This technology may be useful in treating ventricular tachycardia resistant to conventional ablation techniques.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15877622     DOI: 10.1046/j.1540-8167.2005.40540.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol        ISSN: 1045-3873


  7 in total

Review 1.  Optimal ablation strategies for different types of ventricular tachycardias.

Authors:  Takumi Yamada; G Neal Kay
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 32.419

2.  Comparison of unipolar versus bipolar ablation and single electrode control versus simultaneous multielectrode temperature control.

Authors:  Pramesh Kovoor; Michael Daly; Jim Pouliopoulos; Vicki Eipper; Barbara Dewsnap; David L Ross
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2007-08-09       Impact factor: 1.900

Review 3.  Ventricular scars and ventricular tachycardia.

Authors:  William G Stevenson
Journal:  Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc       Date:  2009

4.  Biophysical parameters during radiofrequency catheter ablation of scar-mediated ventricular tachycardia: epicardial and endocardial applications via manual and magnetic navigation.

Authors:  Tara Bourke; Eric Buch; Nilesh Mathuria; Yoav Michowitz; Ricky Yu; Ravi Mandapati; Kalyanam Shivkumar; Roderick Tung
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  2014-07-24

5.  Enhanced visualization of fine needles under sonographic guidance using a MEMS actuator.

Authors:  Zhiyuan Shen; Yufeng Zhou; Jianmin Miao; Kien Fong Vu
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2015-01-30       Impact factor: 3.576

Review 6.  Innovations in Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology: Challenges and Upcoming Solutions in 2018 and Beyond.

Authors:  Vaibhav R Vaidya; Alan Sugure; Samuel J Asirvatham
Journal:  J Innov Card Rhythm Manag       Date:  2017-12-15

7.  Clinical experience of bronchoscopy-guided radiofrequency ablation for peripheral-type lung cancer.

Authors:  Tomonobu Koizumi; Takashi Kobayashi; Tsuyoshi Tanabe; Kenji Tsushima; Masanori Yasuo
Journal:  Case Rep Oncol Med       Date:  2013-09-11
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.