Jennifer L Wolff1, Chad Boult, Cynthia Boyd, Gerard Anderson. 1. Lipitz Center for Integrated Health Care, Department of Health Policy and Management, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland 21205, USA. jwolff@jhsph.edu
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To examine the relationship between newly reported chronic conditions and subsequent functional dependency in older adults. DESIGN: Three-year cohort study. SETTING: United States. PARTICIPANTS: A national sample of Americans age 65 and older (N=4,968) who participated in the Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey. MEASUREMENTS: Self-reports of new physician diagnoses between baseline and 12 months and functional dependency onset at 12-, 24-, and 36-month follow-up. Functional dependency is defined as needing help with or being unable to perform one or more activities of daily living or residence in a long-term care facility. RESULTS: After 12 months of follow-up, 29.8% of participants reported one or more newly diagnosed conditions, increasing to 48.7% at 24 months and 61.3% at 36 months. Number of newly reported conditions was associated with greater probability of functional dependency; this association was strongest at 12 months. The odds of becoming functionally dependent were nearly twice as great in participants who reported one new chronic condition (odds ratio (OR)=1.9, 95% confidence interval (CI)=1.3-2.8), more than four times as great in those who reported two new chronic conditions (OR=4.3, 95%=CI 2.7-6.9), and 13 times as great in those who reported three or more new chronic conditions (OR=13.0, 95%=CI 6.5-26.3) as in those who reported no new chronic conditions. Newly reported dementia, stroke, psychological disorders, low body mass index, and obesity were significantly and consistently related to functional dependency throughout all 3 years of observation (OR=2.1-14.1). CONCLUSION: Findings from this study demonstrate the strong relationship between newly diagnosed chronic conditions and functional dependency and highlight the potential benefit of prevention in older adults.
OBJECTIVES: To examine the relationship between newly reported chronic conditions and subsequent functional dependency in older adults. DESIGN: Three-year cohort study. SETTING: United States. PARTICIPANTS: A national sample of Americans age 65 and older (N=4,968) who participated in the Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey. MEASUREMENTS: Self-reports of new physician diagnoses between baseline and 12 months and functional dependency onset at 12-, 24-, and 36-month follow-up. Functional dependency is defined as needing help with or being unable to perform one or more activities of daily living or residence in a long-term care facility. RESULTS: After 12 months of follow-up, 29.8% of participants reported one or more newly diagnosed conditions, increasing to 48.7% at 24 months and 61.3% at 36 months. Number of newly reported conditions was associated with greater probability of functional dependency; this association was strongest at 12 months. The odds of becoming functionally dependent were nearly twice as great in participants who reported one new chronic condition (odds ratio (OR)=1.9, 95% confidence interval (CI)=1.3-2.8), more than four times as great in those who reported two new chronic conditions (OR=4.3, 95%=CI 2.7-6.9), and 13 times as great in those who reported three or more new chronic conditions (OR=13.0, 95%=CI 6.5-26.3) as in those who reported no new chronic conditions. Newly reported dementia, stroke, psychological disorders, low body mass index, and obesity were significantly and consistently related to functional dependency throughout all 3 years of observation (OR=2.1-14.1). CONCLUSION: Findings from this study demonstrate the strong relationship between newly diagnosed chronic conditions and functional dependency and highlight the potential benefit of prevention in older adults.
Authors: Elisa Fabbri; Toshiko Tanaka; Yang An; Marco Zoli; Stefania Bandinelli; Jack M Guralnik; Eleanor M Simonsick; Cynthia M Boyd; Stephanie A Studenski; Tamara B Harris; Luigi Ferrucci Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2015-08-27 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: David Dorr; Laura M Bonner; Amy N Cohen; Rebecca S Shoai; Ruth Perrin; Edmund Chaney; Alexander S Young Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2007-01-09 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Supriya Gupta Mohile; Ying Xian; William Dale; Susan G Fisher; Miriam Rodin; Gary R Morrow; Alfred Neugut; William Hall Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2009-07-28 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Cynthia M Boyd; Christine S Ritchie; Edmond F Tipton; Stephanie A Studenski; Darryl Wieland Journal: Aging Clin Exp Res Date: 2008-06 Impact factor: 3.636
Authors: Julie P W Bynum; Alice Andrews; Sandra Sharp; Dennis McCollough; John E Wennberg Journal: Health Aff (Millwood) Date: 2011-05 Impact factor: 6.301
Authors: Stephen P Gulley; Elizabeth K Rasch; Christina D Bethell; Adam C Carle; Benjamin G Druss; Amy J Houtrow; Amanda Reichard; Leighton Chan Journal: Disabil Health J Date: 2018-01-10 Impact factor: 2.554
Authors: Renata M Sousa; Cleusa P Ferri; Daisy Acosta; Emiliano Albanese; Mariella Guerra; Yueqin Huang; K S Jacob; A T Jotheeswaran; Juan J Llibre Rodriguez; Guillermina Rodriguez Pichardo; Marina Calvo Rodriguez; Aquiles Salas; Ana Luisa Sosa; Joseph Williams; Tirso Zuniga; Martin Prince Journal: Lancet Date: 2009-11-28 Impact factor: 79.321