Literature DB >> 15876642

An in vitro model for investigating impedance changes with cell growth and electrical stimulation: implications for cochlear implants.

Carrie Newbold1, Rachael Richardson, Christie Q Huang, Dusan Milojevic, Robert Cowan, Robert Shepherd.   

Abstract

The impedance of stimulating electrodes used in cochlear implants and other neural prostheses often increases post-implantation, and is thought to be due to fibrous tissue encapsulation of the electrode array. Increased impedance results in higher power requirements to stimulate target neurons at set charge densities. We developed an in vitro model to investigate the electrode-tissue interface in a highly controlled environment. This model was tested using three cell types, with and without charge-balanced biphasic electrical stimulation. Under standard tissue culture conditions, a monolayer of cells was grown over the electrode surface. Electrode impedance increased in proportion to the extent of cell coverage of the electrode. Cell type was a significant factor in the amount of impedance increase, with kidney epithelial cells (MDCK) creating the greatest impedance, followed by dissociated rat skin fibroblasts and then macrophages (J774). The application of electrical stimulation to cell-covered electrodes caused impedance fluctuations similar to that seen in vivo, with a lowering of impedance immediately following stimulation, and a recovery to pre-stimulation levels during inactive periods. Examination of these electrodes suggests that the stimulation-induced impedance changes were due to the amount of cell cover over the electrodes. This in vitro technique accurately models the changes in impedance observed with neural prostheses in vivo, and shows the close relationship between impedance and tissue coverage adjacent to the electrode surface. We believe that this in vitro approach holds great promise to further our knowledge of the mechanisms contributing to electrode impedance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15876642     DOI: 10.1088/1741-2560/1/4/005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neural Eng        ISSN: 1741-2552            Impact factor:   5.379


  20 in total

1.  A fully implantable stimulator for use in small laboratory animals.

Authors:  Rodney E Millard; Robert K Shepherd
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2007-07-24       Impact factor: 2.390

2.  Effects of deafening and cochlear implantation procedures on postimplantation psychophysical electrical detection thresholds.

Authors:  Gina L Su; Deborah J Colesa; Bryan E Pfingst
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2008-05-10       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  Effects of hearing preservation on psychophysical responses to cochlear implant stimulation.

Authors:  Stephen Y Kang; Deborah J Colesa; Donald L Swiderski; Gina L Su; Yehoash Raphael; Bryan E Pfingst
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2009-11-10

4.  Electrical stimulation causes rapid changes in electrode impedance of cell-covered electrodes.

Authors:  Carrie Newbold; Rachael Richardson; Rodney Millard; Peter Seligman; Robert Cowan; Robert Shepherd
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2011-05-16       Impact factor: 5.379

5.  Changes in biphasic electrode impedance with protein adsorption and cell growth.

Authors:  Carrie Newbold; Rachael Richardson; Rodney Millard; Christie Huang; Dusan Milojevic; Robert Shepherd; Robert Cowan
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2010-09-14       Impact factor: 5.379

Review 6.  Challenges for stem cells to functionally repair the damaged auditory nerve.

Authors:  Karina Needham; Ricki L Minter; Robert K Shepherd; Bryony A Nayagam
Journal:  Expert Opin Biol Ther       Date:  2012-10-25       Impact factor: 4.388

7.  Delayed changes in auditory status in cochlear implant users with preserved acoustic hearing.

Authors:  Rachel A Scheperle; Viral D Tejani; Julia K Omtvedt; Carolyn J Brown; Paul J Abbas; Marlan R Hansen; Bruce J Gantz; Jacob J Oleson; Marie V Ozanne
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2017-04-12       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 8.  Neural prostheses and brain plasticity.

Authors:  James B Fallon; Dexter R F Irvine; Robert K Shepherd
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2009-10-23       Impact factor: 5.379

9.  On-line observation of cell growth in a three-dimensional matrix on surface-modified microelectrode arrays.

Authors:  Shu-Ping Lin; Themis R Kyriakides; Jia-Jin J Chen
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2009-04-03       Impact factor: 12.479

10.  Experimental and theoretical characterization of the voltage distribution generated by deep brain stimulation.

Authors:  Svjetlana Miocinovic; Scott F Lempka; Gary S Russo; Christopher B Maks; Christopher R Butson; Ken E Sakaie; Jerrold L Vitek; Cameron C McIntyre
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  2008-12-11       Impact factor: 5.330

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.