Literature DB >> 15876563

Trace methane oxidation studied in several Euryarchaeota under diverse conditions.

James J Moran1, Christopher H House, Katherine H Freeman, James G Ferry.   

Abstract

We used (13)C-labeled methane to document the extent of trace methane oxidation by Archaeoglobus fulgidus, Archaeoglobus lithotrophicus, Archaeoglobus profundus, Methanobacterium thermoautotrophicum, Methanosarcina barkeri and Methanosarcina acetivorans. The results indicate trace methane oxidation during growth varied among different species and among methanogen cultures grown on different substrates. The extent of trace methane oxidation by Mb. thermoautotrophicum (0.05 +/- 0.04%, +/- 2 standard deviations of the methane produced during growth) was less than that by M. barkeri (0.15 +/- 0.04%), grown under similar conditions with H(2) and CO(2). Methanosarcina acetivorans oxidized more methane during growth on trimethylamine (0.36 +/- 0.05%) than during growth on methanol (0.07 +/- 0.03%). This may indicate that, in M. acetivorans, either a methyltransferase related to growth on trimethylamine plays a role in methane oxidation, or that methanol is an intermediate of methane oxidation. Addition of possible electron acceptors (O(2), NO(3) (-), SO(4) (2-), SO(3) (2-)) or H(2) to the headspace did not substantially enhance or diminish methane oxidation in M. acetivorans cultures. Separate growth experiments with FAD and NAD(+) showed that inclusion of these electron carriers also did not enhance methane oxidation. Our results suggest trace methane oxidized during methanogenesis cannot be coupled to the reduction of these electron acceptors in pure cultures, and that the mechanism by which methane is oxidized in methanogens is independent of H(2) concentration. In contrast to the methanogens, species of the sulfate-reducing genus Archaeoglobus did not significantly oxidize methane during growth (oxidizing 0.003 +/- 0.01% of the methane provided to A. fulgidus, 0.002 +/- 0.009% to A. lithotrophicus and 0.003 +/- 0.02% to A. profundus). Lack of observable methane oxidation in the three Archaeoglobus species examined may indicate that methyl-coenzyme M reductase, which is not present in this genus, is required for the anaerobic oxidation of methane, consistent with the "reverse methanogenesis" hypothesis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15876563      PMCID: PMC2685550          DOI: 10.1155/2005/650670

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Archaea            Impact factor:   3.273


  20 in total

Review 1.  New perspectives on anaerobic methane oxidation.

Authors:  D L Valentine; W S Reeburgh
Journal:  Environ Microbiol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 5.491

2.  Methane-consuming archaea revealed by directly coupled isotopic and phylogenetic analysis.

Authors:  V J Orphan; C H House; K U Hinrichs; K D McKeegan; E F DeLong
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-07-20       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  A conspicuous nickel protein in microbial mats that oxidize methane anaerobically.

Authors:  Martin Krüger; Anke Meyerdierks; Frank Oliver Glöckner; Rudolf Amann; Friedrich Widdel; Michael Kube; Richard Reinhardt; Jörg Kahnt; Reinhard Böcher; Rudolf K Thauer; Seigo Shima
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-12-18       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  FORMATION OF METHANE BY BACTERIAL EXTRACTS.

Authors:  E A WOLIN; M J WOLIN; R S WOLFE
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1963-08       Impact factor: 5.157

5.  Isolation of extremely thermophilic sulfate reducers: evidence for a novel branch of archaebacteria.

Authors:  K O Stetter; G Lauerer; M Thomm; A Neuner
Journal:  Science       Date:  1987-05-15       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Multiple archaeal groups mediate methane oxidation in anoxic cold seep sediments.

Authors:  Victoria J Orphan; Christopher H House; Kai-Uwe Hinrichs; Kevin D McKeegan; Edward F DeLong
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-05-28       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Hydrogen production by methanogens under low-hydrogen conditions.

Authors:  D L Valentine; D C Blanton; W S Reeburgh
Journal:  Arch Microbiol       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 2.552

8.  Methane-consuming archaebacteria in marine sediments.

Authors:  K U Hinrichs; J M Hayes; S P Sylva; P G Brewer; E F DeLong
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1999-04-29       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Methane formation and methane oxidation by methanogenic bacteria.

Authors:  A J Zehnder; T D Brock
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1979-01       Impact factor: 3.490

10.  Identification of methyl coenzyme M reductase A (mcrA) genes associated with methane-oxidizing archaea.

Authors:  Steven J Hallam; Peter R Girguis; Christina M Preston; Paul M Richardson; Edward F DeLong
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 4.792

View more
  20 in total

1.  Carbon and sulfur back flux during anaerobic microbial oxidation of methane and coupled sulfate reduction.

Authors:  Thomas Holler; Gunter Wegener; Helge Niemann; Christian Deusner; Timothy G Ferdelman; Antje Boetius; Benjamin Brunner; Friedrich Widdel
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-12-12       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Quantification of the methane concentration using anaerobic oxidation of methane coupled to extracellular electron transfer.

Authors:  Yaohuan Gao; Hodon Ryu; Bruce E Rittmann; Abid Hussain; Hyung-Sool Lee
Journal:  Bioresour Technol       Date:  2017-06-13       Impact factor: 9.642

Review 3.  Methane oxidation by anaerobic archaea for conversion to liquid fuels.

Authors:  Thomas J Mueller; Matthew J Grisewood; Hadi Nazem-Bokaee; Saratram Gopalakrishnan; James G Ferry; Thomas K Wood; Costas D Maranas
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2014-11-27       Impact factor: 3.346

4.  The evolutionary history of Cys-tRNACys formation.

Authors:  Patrick O'Donoghue; Anurag Sethi; Carl R Woese; Zaida A Luthey-Schulten
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-12-27       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Methyl sulfide production by a novel carbon monoxide metabolism in Methanosarcina acetivorans.

Authors:  James J Moran; Christopher H House; Jennifer M Vrentas; Katherine H Freeman
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2007-11-16       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Assessing methanotrophy and carbon fixation for biofuel production by Methanosarcina acetivorans.

Authors:  Hadi Nazem-Bokaee; Saratram Gopalakrishnan; James G Ferry; Thomas K Wood; Costas D Maranas
Journal:  Microb Cell Fact       Date:  2016-01-17       Impact factor: 5.328

7.  A heme-based redox sensor in the methanogenic archaeon Methanosarcina acetivorans.

Authors:  Bastian Molitor; Marc Stassen; Anuja Modi; Samir F El-Mashtoly; Christoph Laurich; Wolfgang Lubitz; John H Dawson; Michael Rother; Nicole Frankenberg-Dinkel
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2013-05-09       Impact factor: 5.157

8.  Physiological differentiation within a single-species biofilm fueled by serpentinization.

Authors:  William J Brazelton; Mausmi P Mehta; Deborah S Kelley; John A Baross
Journal:  MBio       Date:  2011-09-01       Impact factor: 7.867

9.  The genome characteristics and predicted function of methyl-group oxidation pathway in the obligate aceticlastic methanogens, Methanosaeta spp.

Authors:  Jinxing Zhu; Huajun Zheng; Guomin Ai; Guishan Zhang; Di Liu; Xiaoli Liu; Xiuzhu Dong
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-10       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Air-adapted Methanosarcina acetivorans shows high methane production and develops resistance against oxygen stress.

Authors:  Ricardo Jasso-Chávez; M Geovanni Santiago-Martínez; Elizabeth Lira-Silva; Erika Pineda; Armando Zepeda-Rodríguez; Javier Belmont-Díaz; Rusely Encalada; Emma Saavedra; Rafael Moreno-Sánchez
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-02-23       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.