Literature DB >> 15876219

Combining quantitative and qualitative measures of uncertainty in model-based environmental assessment: the NUSAP system.

Jeroen P van der Sluijs1, Matthieu Craye, Silvio Funtowicz, Penny Kloprogge, Jerry Ravetz, James Risbey.   

Abstract

This article discusses recent experiences with the Numeral Unit Spread Assessment Pedigree (NUSAP) system for multidimensional uncertainty assessment, based on four case studies that vary in complexity. We show that the NUSAP method is applicable not only to relatively simple calculation schemes but also to complex models in a meaningful way and that NUSAP is useful to assess not only parameter uncertainty but also (model) assumptions. A diagnostic diagram can be used to synthesize results of quantitative analysis of parameter sensitivity and qualitative review (pedigree analysis) of parameter strength. It provides an analytic tool to prioritize uncertainties according to quantitative and qualitative insights in the limitations of available knowledge. We show that extension of the pedigree scheme to include societal dimensions of uncertainty, such as problem framing and value-laden assumptions, further promotes reflexivity and collective learning. When used in a deliberative setting, NUSAP pedigree assessment has the potential to foster a deeper social debate and a negotiated management of complex environmental problems.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15876219     DOI: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2005.00604.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Risk Anal        ISSN: 0272-4332            Impact factor:   4.000


  12 in total

1.  Harnessing ecosystem models and multi-criteria decision analysis for the support of forest management.

Authors:  Bernhard Wolfslehner; Rupert Seidl
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2009-12-19       Impact factor: 3.266

2.  Use (and abuse) of expert elicitation in support of decision making for public policy.

Authors:  M Granger Morgan
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-05-12       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  The use of expert elicitation in environmental health impact assessment: a seven step procedure.

Authors:  Anne B Knol; Pauline Slottje; Jeroen P van der Sluijs; Erik Lebret
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2010-04-26       Impact factor: 5.984

4.  Post-Normal Science in Practice at the Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency.

Authors:  Arthur C Petersen; Albert Cath; Maria Hage; Eva Kunseler; Jeroen P van der Sluijs
Journal:  Sci Technol Human Values       Date:  2011-05

5.  Ethical issues in engineering models: an operations researcher's reflections.

Authors:  J Kleijnen
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2010-06-11       Impact factor: 3.525

Review 6.  Perspectives to performance of environment and health assessments and models--from outputs to outcomes?

Authors:  Mikko V Pohjola; Pasi Pohjola; Marko Tainio; Jouni T Tuomisto
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2013-06-26       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 7.  Dealing with uncertainties in environmental burden of disease assessment.

Authors:  Anne B Knol; Arthur C Petersen; Jeroen P van der Sluijs; Erik Lebret
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2009-04-28       Impact factor: 5.984

8.  Approaches to integrated monitoring for environmental health impact assessment.

Authors:  Hai-Ying Liu; Alena Bartonova; Mathilde Pascal; Roel Smolders; Erik Skjetne; Maria Dusinska
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 5.984

9.  A conceptual approach to a citizens' observatory--supporting community-based environmental governance.

Authors:  Hai-Ying Liu; Mike Kobernus; David Broday; Alena Bartonova
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2014-12-12       Impact factor: 5.984

10.  The communication of physical science uncertainty in European National Adaptation Strategies.

Authors:  S Lorenz; S Dessai; J Paavola; P M Forster
Journal:  Clim Change       Date:  2013-07-27       Impact factor: 4.743

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.