Literature DB >> 15875568

Inbreeding uncovers fundamental differences in the genetic load affecting male and female fertility in a butterfly.

Ilik J Saccheri1, Hywel D Lloyd, Sarah J Helyar, Paul M Brakefield.   

Abstract

Inbreeding depression is most pronounced for traits closely associated with fitness. The traditional explanation is that natural selection eliminates deleterious mutations with additive or dominant effects more effectively than recessive mutations, leading to directional dominance for traits subject to strong directional selection. Here we report the unexpected finding that, in the butterfly Bicyclus anynana, male sterility contributes disproportionately to inbreeding depression for fitness (complete sterility in about half the sons from brother-sister matings), while female fertility is insensitive to inbreeding. The contrast between the sexes for functionally equivalent traits is inconsistent with standard selection arguments, and suggests that trait-specific developmental properties and cryptic selection play crucial roles in shaping genetic architecture. There is evidence that spermatogenesis is less developmentally stable than oogenesis, though the unusually high male fertility load in B. anynana additionally suggests the operation of complex selection maintaining male sterility recessives. Analysis of the precise causes of inbreeding depression will be needed to generate a model that reliably explains variation in directional dominance and reconciles the gap between observed and expected genetic loads carried by populations. This challenging evolutionary puzzle should stimulate work on the occurrence and causes of sex differences in fertility load.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15875568      PMCID: PMC1634945          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2004.2903

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  22 in total

1.  Sex ratio distortion and severe inbreeding depression in the gypsy moth Lymantria dispar L. in Hokkaido, Japan.

Authors:  Y Higashiura; M Ishihara; P W Schaefer
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 3.821

2.  Polyandrous females avoid costs of inbreeding.

Authors:  Tom Tregenza; Nina Wedell
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-01-03       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Effects of bottlenecks on quantitative genetic variation in the butterfly Bicyclus anynana.

Authors:  I J Saccheri; R A Nichols; P M Brakefield
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 1.588

4.  Rapid spread of immigrant genomes into inbred populations.

Authors:  Ilik J Saccheri; Paul M Brakefield
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2002-05-22       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Heterosis increases the effective migration rate.

Authors:  P K Ingvarsson; M C Whitlock
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2000-07-07       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Relative genetic loads due to lethal and detrimental genes in irradiated population of drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  C S CHUNG
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1962-11       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Inbreeding of bottlenecked butterfly populations. Estimation using the likelihood of changes in marker allele frequencies.

Authors:  I J Saccheri; I J Wilson; R A Nichols; M W Bruford; P M Brakefield
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Concealed genic variability in Brazilian populations of Drosophila Willistoni.

Authors:  C PAVAN; A R CORDEIRO; N DOBZHANSKY; TH DOBZHANSKY; C MALOGOLOWKIN; B SPASSKY; M WEDDEL
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1951-01       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 9.  Mutations affecting fitness in Drosophila populations.

Authors:  M J Simmons; J F Crow
Journal:  Annu Rev Genet       Date:  1977       Impact factor: 16.830

10.  Purging inbreeding depression and the probability of extinction: full-sib mating.

Authors:  P W Hedrick
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 3.821

View more
  17 in total

1.  Age specificity of inbreeding load in Drosophila melanogaster and implications for the evolution of late-life mortality plateaus.

Authors:  Rose M Reynolds; Sara Temiyasathit; Melissa M Reedy; Elizabeth A Ruedi; Jenny M Drnevich; Jeff Leips; Kimberly A Hughes
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2007-07-29       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Potential constraints on evolution: sexual dimorphism and the problem of protandry in the butterfly Bicyclus anynana.

Authors:  Bas J Zwaan; Wilte G Zijlstra; Marieke Keller; Jeroen Pijpe; Paul M Brakefield
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 1.166

3.  The scent of inbreeding: a male sex pheromone betrays inbred males.

Authors:  Erik van Bergen; Paul M Brakefield; Stéphanie Heuskin; Bas J Zwaan; Caroline M Nieberding
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-03-06       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  A father effect explains sex-ratio bias.

Authors:  Aurelio F Malo; Felipe Martinez-Pastor; Francisco Garcia-Gonzalez; Julián Garde; Jonathan D Ballou; Robert C Lacy
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-08-30       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  The genetic architecture of life span and mortality rates: gender and species differences in inbreeding load of two seed-feeding beetles.

Authors:  Charles W Fox; Kristy L Scheibly; William G Wallin; Lisa J Hitchcock; R Craig Stillwell; Benjamin P Smith
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-08-03       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Recessive Z-linked lethals and the retention of haplotype diversity in a captive butterfly population.

Authors:  Ilik J Saccheri; Samuel Whiteford; Carl J Yung; Arjen E Van't Hof
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2020-05-13       Impact factor: 3.821

7.  No evidence for increased extinction proneness with decreasing effective population size in a parasitoid with complementary sex determination and fertile diploid males.

Authors:  Jan Elias; Silvia Dorn; Dominique Mazzi
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2010-11-26       Impact factor: 3.260

8.  Drivers of sex ratio bias in the eastern bongo: lower inbreeding increases the probability of being born male.

Authors:  Aurelio F Malo; Tania C Gilbert; Philip Riordan
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-05-15       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  High genetic load in an old isolated butterfly population.

Authors:  Anniina L K Mattila; Anne Duplouy; Malla Kirjokangas; Rainer Lehtonen; Pasi Rastas; Ilkka Hanski
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-08-20       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Impact of inbreeding on fertility in a pre-industrial population.

Authors:  Alexandre Robert; Bruno Toupance; Marc Tremblay; Evelyne Heyer
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2008-12-17       Impact factor: 4.246

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.