Literature DB >> 15874873

A cost-effectiveness analysis of screening strategies for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.

J Michael Straughn1, T Michael Numnum, Rodney P Rocconi, Charles A Leath, Edward E Partridge.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the costs and usefulness of colposcopy using three screening strategies for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A decision model compared three screening strategies for CIN: (1) patients were screened annually with a conventional Pap smear, (2) patients were screened annually with a liquid-based cytologic method and reflex human papillomavirus testing for atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance results, and (3) patients were screened biennially with a liquid-based cytologic method and reflex human papillomavirus testing for atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance results.
RESULTS: Biennial liquid-based screening was the least expensive strategy with a cost of $9.5 million per 100,000 patients. Annual liquid-based screening was the most expensive strategy at $13.7 million. Annual conventional screening had an intermediate cost of $11.6 million. Biennial liquid-based screening referred the fewest patients to colposcopy (11.8%), followed by annual conventional screening and annual liquid-based screening (15.2% and 15.6%, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: Each of these treatment strategies is reasonable; however, biennial liquid-based screening would reduce medical costs significantly.

Entities:  

Year:  2004        PMID: 15874873     DOI: 10.1097/00128360-200410000-00004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Low Genit Tract Dis        ISSN: 1089-2591            Impact factor:   1.925


  1 in total

1.  Cost-effectiveness of cervical cancer screening: cytology versus human papillomavirus DNA testing.

Authors:  J van Rosmalen; I M C M de Kok; M van Ballegooijen
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2012-01-18       Impact factor: 6.531

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.