Literature DB >> 15872322

In vivo evaluation of the carotid wallstent on three-dimensional contrast material-enhanced MR angiography: influence of artifacts on the visibility of stent lumina.

Ingitha Borisch1, Okka W Hamer, Niels Zorger, Stefan Feuerbach, Johann Link.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Contrast material-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) angiography is increasingly used in postinterventional imaging after implantation of endovascular stents. The main limitations are stent-related artifacts compromising the visibility of the stent lumen. The aim of this in vivo study is the evaluation of contrast-enhanced MR angiography imaging characteristics of the carotid Wallstent.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The carotid arteries of 29 patients were examined with contrast-enhanced MR angiography 3-6 days and/or 7-23 months after implantation of a carotid Wallstent into the internal carotid artery. Images were evaluated with regard to the diameter and signal intensity (SI) of the visible stent lumen. Digital subtraction angiography (DSA) was used as the standard of reference.
RESULTS: Stent-related artifacts on contrast-enhanced MR angiography caused an artificial lumen narrowing and a reduction of the SI within the stent. Artifacts were pronounced on imaging 3-6 days after stent implantation, but 68% of stents imaged 7-23 months after stent implantation presented with a significantly decreased artificial signal reduction and an improved visibility of the stent lumen.
CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study indicate that a reliable evaluation of the stent lumen is limited as a result of an artificial decrease of the SI inside the stent. However, in follow-up examinations 7-23 months after stent implantation, visibility of the stent lumen was improved and diagnostic reliability of contrast-enhanced MR angiography was markedly increased. A probable explanation for this phenomenon might be the formation of a neointimal layer covering the stent struts and thereby reducing stent-related artifacts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15872322     DOI: 10.1097/01.RVI.0000156187.35215.22

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol        ISSN: 1051-0443            Impact factor:   3.464


  2 in total

1.  Comparing different MR angiography strategies of carotid stents in a vascular flow model: toward stent-specific recommendations in MR follow-up.

Authors:  Andreas M J Frölich; Sara M Pilgram-Pastor; Marios N Psychogios; Alexander Mohr; Michael Knauth
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2010-08-19       Impact factor: 2.804

2.  Artificial luminal narrowing on contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiograms on an occasion of stent-assisted coiling of intracranial aneurysm: in vitro comparison using two different stents with variable imaging parameters.

Authors:  Jee Hyun Seok; Hyun Seok Choi; So-Lyung Jung; Kook-Jin Ahn; Myeong Jin Kim; Yong Sam Shin; Bum-soo Kim
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2012-08-28       Impact factor: 3.500

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.