Literature DB >> 15871875

The NJ SEED project: evaluation of an innovative initiative for ethics training in nursing homes.

Christine M Weston1, Linda A O'Brien, Neil I Goldfarb, Adam R Roumm, William P Isele, Kathryn Hirschfeld.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This article reports the results of an evaluation of the New Jersey Stein Ethics Education and Development (NJ SEED) project--a statewide initiative to create, organize and educate a statewide network of regional long-term care ethics committees. The main focus of the evaluation was to measure utilization of the committees, describe how facilities have benefited from the project, and identify potential barriers to the use of this resource.
METHODS: Based on administrative records from the NJ SEED project, 225 facilities were identified and asked to complete a facility survey. Ninety-three surveys were received, resulting in a 41% response rate. An additional survey of the regional ethics committees (RECs), as well as several focus groups and individual interviews were conducted to supplement the survey data.
RESULTS: Fifty-eight percent of the facility respondents reported current participation in an NJ regional ethics committee. About one third (30%) of participating facilities had requested a formal case consultation (on at least one occasion) on behalf of a resident, but two thirds had consulted with their RECs on a more informal basis. Facilities that reported participating in the REC Network were more likely to have formally written policies than nonparticipants.
CONCLUSIONS: Many NJ nursing homes find the statewide REC Network to be an important resource; however continued efforts need to be expended for recruiting and training facilities that are not taking full advantage of this important source of peer support and professional expertise.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15871875     DOI: 10.1016/j.jamda.2004.12.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Med Dir Assoc        ISSN: 1525-8610            Impact factor:   4.669


  5 in total

1.  Nurses' responses to initial moral distress in long-term care.

Authors:  Marie P Edwards; Susan E McClement; Laurie R Read
Journal:  J Bioeth Inq       Date:  2013-06-22       Impact factor: 1.352

2.  Unrepresented Adults Face Adverse Healthcare Consequences: The Role of Guardians, Public Guardianship Reform, and Alternative Policy Solutions.

Authors:  Casey C Catlin; Heather L Connors; Pamela B Teaster; Erica Wood; Zachary S Sager; Jennifer Moye
Journal:  J Aging Soc Policy       Date:  2021-01-18

3.  They know!-Do they? A qualitative study of residents and relatives views on advance care planning, end-of-life care, and decision-making in nursing homes.

Authors:  Georg Bollig; Eva Gjengedal; Jan Henrik Rosland
Journal:  Palliat Med       Date:  2015-09-22       Impact factor: 4.762

4.  Barriers and facilitators to person-centred infection prevention and control: results of a survey about the Dementia Isolation Toolkit.

Authors:  Andrea Iaboni; Hannah Quirt; Katia Engell; Julia Kirkham; Steven Stewart; Alisa Grigorovich; Pia Kontos; Josephine McMurray; AnneMarie Levy; Kathleen Bingham; Kevin Rodrigues; Arlene Astell; Alastair J Flint; Colleen Maxwell
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2022-01-25       Impact factor: 3.921

5.  Nothing to complain about? Residents' and relatives' views on a "good life" and ethical challenges in nursing homes.

Authors:  Georg Bollig; Eva Gjengedal; Jan Henrik Rosland
Journal:  Nurs Ethics       Date:  2014-12-08       Impact factor: 2.874

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.