Literature DB >> 15871700

The influence of knowledge of mammography findings on the accuracy of breast ultrasound in symptomatic women.

Nehmat Houssami1, Les Irwig, Judy M Simpson, Merran McKessar, Steven Blome, Jennie Noakes.   

Abstract

Breast ultrasound is generally interpreted with knowledge of the mammographic examination. This study examined the influence of knowledge of mammography findings on the accuracy of ultrasound in women with breast symptoms. Subjects were sampled from all women 25-55 years of age consecutively attending a breast clinic. This included all 240 women shown to have breast cancer and 240 age-matched women shown not to have cancer. Ultrasound films were prospectively reviewed and reported by two radiologists independent of each other and in a blinded manner. A two-phase design was used. In the first phase, the radiologists provided an opinion on the ultrasound films. In the second phase, the ultrasound films were reread with consideration of the corresponding mammographic examination. The accuracy of reading the ultrasound with and without knowledge of the findings on mammography was compared using sensitivity and specificity, and receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves. Reporting the ultrasound with knowledge of mammography (compared to without mammography) improved sensitivity and reduced specificity for both radiologists. For one reader, sensitivity increased from 77.5% to 86.7% (p = 0.0002) and specificity decreased from 89.7% to 85.4% (p = 0.04). For the other reader, sensitivity increased from 81.3% to 87.5% (p = 0.0023) and specificity decreased from 87.1% to 85.0% (p = 0.27). ROC curves for both radiologists showed that reporting ultrasound with knowledge of mammography resulted in small (about 3%), but significant improvement in the area under the ROC curve. Our study indicates that knowledge of the findings of mammography improves the interpretation of breast ultrasound in symptomatic women.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15871700     DOI: 10.1111/j.1075-122X.2005.21643.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast J        ISSN: 1075-122X            Impact factor:   2.431


  6 in total

1.  Design-related bias in estimates of accuracy when comparing imaging tests: examples from breast imaging research.

Authors:  Nehmat Houssami; Stefano Ciatto
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic imaging in symptomatic breast patients: team and individual performance.

Authors:  P Britton; J Warwick; M G Wallis; S O'Keeffe; K Taylor; R Sinnatamby; S Barter; M Gaskarth; S W Duffy; G C Wishart
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2011-01-11       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) identified proteomic biosignatures of breast cancer in proximal fluid.

Authors:  Stephen A Whelan; Jianbo He; Ming Lu; Puneet Souda; Romaine E Saxton; Kym F Faull; Julian P Whitelegge; Helena R Chang
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2012-09-20       Impact factor: 4.466

4.  Comparative accuracy of mammography and ultrasound in women with breast symptoms according to age and breast density.

Authors:  Emine Devolli-Disha; Suzana Manxhuka-Kërliu; Halit Ymeri; Arben Kutllovci
Journal:  Bosn J Basic Med Sci       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 3.363

5.  Potential biomarkers in the sera of breast cancer patients from bahawalpur, pakistan.

Authors:  Faiz-Ul-Hassan Nasim; Samina Ejaz; Muhammad Ashraf; Abdul Rehman Asif; Michael Oellerich; Gulzar Ahmad; Gulzar Ahmad Malik
Journal:  Biomark Cancer       Date:  2012-12-10

6.  Clinical Factors Associated with Asymptomatic Women Having Inconclusive Screening Mammography Results: Experiences from a Single Medical Center in Taiwan.

Authors:  Chun-Li Wang; Pi-Shan Hsu; Chia-Yen Lin; Shun-Fa Yang
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-05-19       Impact factor: 3.390

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.