Literature DB >> 15871046

The hydrophobicity of the H3 histone fold differs from the hydrophobicity of the other three folds.

B David Silverman1.   

Abstract

The eukaryotic histone dimers, H3-H4 and H2A-H2B, are formed in the cytosol prior to being transported into the nucleus and assembled into the nucleosome. Residue side-chain distances from the interior of the histone dimers are obtained with an ellipsoidal spatial metric and structural information provided by X-ray analyses at atomic resolution of the nucleosome core particles. While the spatial hydrophobic moment profiles of the dimers are comparable with profiles obtained previously that characterize the hydrophobic core of single-chain, single-domain globular soluble proteins, correlation coefficients between the side-chain hydrophobicities and distances from the interior of the H3-H4 dimer and H2A-H2B dimer differ significantly. This difference is traced to the H3 histone fold, which segregates fewer hydrophobic residues within the protein interior than the three other folds. Examination of the correlation coefficient between residue hydrophobicity and side-chain distance from the dimer interior over local regions of the fold sequence shows that the region of reduced correlation is associated mainly with the residues at the carboxyl end of the H3 histone fold, the helical region of the fold involved in the H3-H3' binding of the (H3-H4)(2) tetramer of the nucleosome. Hydrophobic interactions apparently contribute to the binding of this fourfold helical bundle and this evolutionary requirement may trade off against the requirement for H3-H4 dimer stability. The present results provide a different view than previously proposed, albeit of similar origin, to account for the reduced stability of the H3-H4 dimer compared with the H2A-H2B dimer.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15871046     DOI: 10.1007/s00239-004-0193-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Evol        ISSN: 0022-2844            Impact factor:   2.395


  28 in total

1.  Asymmetries in the nucleosome core particle at 2.5 A resolution.

Authors:  J M Harp; B L Hanson; D E Timm; G J Bunick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  2000-12

2.  Conserved eukaryotic histone-fold residues substituted into an archaeal histone increase DNA affinity but reduce complex flexibility.

Authors:  Divya J Soares; Frédéric Marc; John N Reeve
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 3.490

3.  Hydrophobic moments of tertiary protein structures.

Authors:  B David Silverman
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2003-12-01

Review 4.  Archaeal histones: structures, stability and DNA binding.

Authors:  J N Reeve; K A Bailey; W-T Li; F Marc; K Sandman; D J Soares
Journal:  Biochem Soc Trans       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 5.407

5.  The nucleosomal core histone octamer at 3.1 A resolution: a tripartite protein assembly and a left-handed superhelix.

Authors:  G Arents; R W Burlingame; B C Wang; W E Love; E N Moudrianakis
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1991-11-15       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Protein structure alignment by incremental combinatorial extension (CE) of the optimal path.

Authors:  I N Shindyalov; P E Bourne
Journal:  Protein Eng       Date:  1998-09

Review 7.  Histones and nucleosomes in Archaea and Eukarya: a comparative analysis.

Authors:  S L Pereira; J N Reeve
Journal:  Extremophiles       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 2.395

8.  Thermodynamic studies of the core histones: pH and ionic strength effects on the stability of the (H3-H4)/(H3-H4)2 system.

Authors:  V Karantza; E Freire; E N Moudrianakis
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1996-02-13       Impact factor: 3.162

9.  Crystal structure of the nucleosome core particle at 2.8 A resolution.

Authors:  K Luger; A W Mäder; R K Richmond; D F Sargent; T J Richmond
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1997-09-18       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  The histone fold: a ubiquitous architectural motif utilized in DNA compaction and protein dimerization.

Authors:  G Arents; E N Moudrianakis
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1995-11-21       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  2 in total

1.  Asymmetry in the burial of hydrophobic residues along the histone chains of eukarya, archaea and a transcription factor.

Authors:  B David Silverman
Journal:  BMC Struct Biol       Date:  2005-10-21

2.  A protein self-assembly model guided by electrostatic and hydrophobic dipole moments.

Authors:  Angel Mozo-Villarías; Enrique Querol
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-04-29       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.