Literature DB >> 15870514

A prospective evaluation of "see and treat" in women with HSIL Pap smear results: is this an appropriate strategy?

T Michael Numnum1, Tyler O Kirby, Charles A Leath, Warner K Huh, Ronald D Alvarez, J Michael Straughn.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The evaluation of abnormal cervical cytologic results is time consuming and costly. Most patients with high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL)-cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 3 (CIN 3) Pap smear results require an excisional procedure for diagnostic or therapeutic reasons. "See and treat" is a surgical procedure that involves a loop electrosurgical excisional procedure (LEEP) simultaneously to diagnose and to treat premalignant cervical disease in one visit. This procedure eliminates a second visit that typically is required for treatment. Data is lacking on the incidence of CIN 2 and CIN 3 in patients with an HSIL (CIN 2) Pap smear result. The objective of this study was to determine the incidence of CIN 2 and CIN 3 in patients with an HSIL (CIN 2) Pap smear using a see-and-treat protocol.
METHODS: Women referred from local health departments to our university-based colposcopy clinic for evaluation of an HSIL (CIN 2) Pap smear result were evaluated for inclusion in a see and treat protocol. All eligible patients underwent colposcopy to rule out an obvious cervical carcinoma followed by an immediate LEEP to remove the transformation zone. A colposcopic impression was made using the Reid colposcopic index. Pathologic specimens were analyzed for the presence of CIN and the incidence of CIN 2 and CIN 3 was determined.
RESULTS: To date, 51 patients have been enrolled in the study. Exclusion criteria included age less than 19 years, pregnancy, or medical contraindications. The mean age of the patients was 26 years (range, 19-45 years). Forty-seven percent were white, 47% were black, and 6% were Hispanic. Of the 51 patients who underwent LEEP, 43 of 51 (85%) had satisfactory colposcopy and no patient had a lesion suspicious for cervical carcinoma. The average Reid colposcopic index was 3.5. Of the 51 LEEP specimens, 4 of 51 had no evidence of CIN (8%), 4 of 51 (8%) had CIN 1, 18 of 51 (35%) had CIN 2, and 25 of 51 (49%) had CIN 3. Eighty-four percent of patients had either CIN 2 or CIN 3, resulting in an overtreatment rate (CIN 1 or less) of 16%.
CONCLUSIONS: The use of a see and treat protocol for patients with HSIL (CIN 2) Pap smear results may be an acceptable treatment option because of a high incidence of CIN 2 and CIN 3.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15870514     DOI: 10.1097/00128360-200501000-00002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Low Genit Tract Dis        ISSN: 1089-2591            Impact factor:   1.925


  9 in total

1.  Three-step approach versus see-and-treat approach in patients with cytological abnormalities.

Authors:  Nilgun Guducu; Guliz Sidar; Nuray Bassullu; Ilknur Turkmen; Ilkkan Dunder
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2013-05-22

2.  See-and-Treat for High-Grade Cytology: Do Young Women Have Different Rates of High-Grade Histology?

Authors:  Haller J Smith; Charles A Leath; Warner K Huh; Britt K Erickson
Journal:  J Low Genit Tract Dis       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 1.925

3.  See-and-Treat Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure for High-Grade Cervical Cytology: Are We Overtreating?

Authors:  Lindsay M Kuroki; Lauren M Bergeron; Feng Gao; Premal H Thaker; Leslie S Massad
Journal:  J Low Genit Tract Dis       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 1.925

4.  Loop Electrosurgical Excisional Procedure (LEEP) Done for Discrepancy: Does the Time from HGSIL Affect Pathologic Grade of CIN in LEEP Specimen?

Authors:  Sue L Moreni; Caroline M Mitchell; Rochelle L Garcia; Linda O Eckert
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Int       Date:  2010-06-29

5.  Practice improvement in cervical screening and management (PICSM): symposium on management of cervical abnormalities in adolescents and young women.

Authors:  Anna-Barbara Moscicki; J Thomas Cox
Journal:  J Low Genit Tract Dis       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 1.925

6.  'See-and-treat' works for cervical cancer prevention: what about controlling the high burden in India?

Authors:  R Sankaranarayanan
Journal:  Indian J Med Res       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 2.375

7.  Single visit approach for management of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia by visual inspection & loop electrosurgical excision procedure.

Authors:  Shilpa Singla; Sandeep Mathur; Alka Kriplani; Nutan Agarwal; Pradeep Garg; Neerja Bhatla
Journal:  Indian J Med Res       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 2.375

8.  Practice guidelines for the early detection of cervical cancer in Korea: Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology and the Korean Society for Cytopathology 2012 edition.

Authors:  Jae Kwan Lee; Jin Hwa Hong; Sokbom Kang; Dae-Yeon Kim; Byoung-Gie Kim; Sung-Hoon Kim; Yong-Man Kim; Jae-Weon Kim; Jae-Hoon Kim; Tae-Jin Kim; Hyun Jung Kim; Hye Sun Kim; Hee-Sug Ryu; Jae Yun Song; Hyeong Sik Ahn; Chong Woo Yoo; Hye-Kyoung Yoon; Keun-Ho Lee; Ahwon Lee; Yonghee Lee; In Ho Lee; Jeong-Won Lee; Taek Sang Lee; Myong Cheol Lim; Suk-Joon Chang; Hyun Hoon Chung; Woong Ju; Hee Jae Joo; Soo-Young Hur; Sung-Ran Hong; Joo-Hyun Nam
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2013-04-05       Impact factor: 4.401

9.  Study of 2 years follow-up of referral patients with abnormal Pap smear.

Authors:  Fariba Behnamfar; Azam Zafarbakhsh; Taj-Alsadat Allameh
Journal:  J Res Med Sci       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 1.852

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.