Literature DB >> 15869049

Thoughts about the ventricular gradient and its current clinical use (Part I of II).

J Willis Hurst1.   

Abstract

The concept of the ventricular gradient was conceived in the mind of Frank Wilson in the early 1930s. Wilson, a mathematical genius, believed that the calculation of the ventricular gradient yielded information that was not otherwise obtainable. The method of analysis was not utilized by clinicians at large because the concept was not easy to understand and because the method used to compute the direction of the ventricular gradient was so time consuming that clinicians could not use it. Grant utilized the concept to create vector electrocardiography, but he believed that if his method of analysis was used, it was not often necessary to compute the direction of the ventricular gradient. He did, however, describe an easy way to compute the direction of the ventricular gradient. The current major clinical use of the ventricular gradient is to identify primary and secondary T-wave abnormalities in an electrocardiogram showing left or right ventricular hypertrophy or left or right ventricular conduction abnormalities. In addition, the author uses the term ventricular time gradient instead of ventricular gradient in an effort to clarify the concept. Finally, the author discusses the possible clinical significance of a normally directed but shorter than normal ventricular time gradient, an attribute that has not been emphasized previously.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15869049      PMCID: PMC6654300          DOI: 10.1002/clc.4960280404

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cardiol        ISSN: 0160-9289            Impact factor:   2.882


  6 in total

1.  Global Electric Heterogeneity Risk Score for Prediction of Sudden Cardiac Death in the General Population: The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) and Cardiovascular Health (CHS) Studies.

Authors:  Jonathan W Waks; Colleen M Sitlani; Elsayed Z Soliman; Muammar Kabir; Elyar Ghafoori; Mary L Biggs; Charles A Henrikson; Nona Sotoodehnia; Tor Biering-Sørensen; Sunil K Agarwal; David S Siscovick; Wendy S Post; Scott D Solomon; Alfred E Buxton; Mark E Josephson; Larisa G Tereshchenko
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2016-04-14       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 2.  Global electrical heterogeneity: A review of the spatial ventricular gradient.

Authors:  Jonathan W Waks; Larisa G Tereshchenko
Journal:  J Electrocardiol       Date:  2016-07-28       Impact factor: 1.438

3.  Improving sudden cardiac death risk stratification by evaluating electrocardiographic measures of global electrical heterogeneity and clinical outcomes among patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators: rationale and design for a retrospective, multicenter, cohort study.

Authors:  Jonathan W Waks; Christopher Hamilton; Saumya Das; Ashkan Ehdaie; Jessica Minnier; Sanjiv Narayan; Mark Niebauer; Merritt Raitt; Christine Tompkins; Niraj Varma; Sumeet Chugh; Larisa G Tereshchenko
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2018-03-14       Impact factor: 1.900

Review 4.  Thoughts about the abnormalities in the electrocardiogram of patients with acute myocardial infarction with emphasis on a more accurate method of interpreting ST-segment displacement: part I.

Authors:  J Willis Hurst
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 2.882

Review 5.  The spatial QRS-T angle: implications in clinical practice.

Authors:  Christina Voulgari; Stamatina Pagoni; Solomon Tesfaye; Nicholas Tentolouris
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rev       Date:  2013-08

6.  Adaptation of ventricular repolarization duration and dispersion during changes in heart rate induced by atrial stimulation.

Authors:  Karl-Jonas Axelsson; Adam Brännlund; Lennart Gransberg; Gunilla Lundahl; Farzad Vahedi; Lennart Bergfeldt
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2019-11-10       Impact factor: 1.468

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.