Literature DB >> 15868798

A comparison between mechano-electrochemical and biphasic swelling theories for soft hydrated tissues.

W Wilson1, C C van Donkelaar, J M Huyghe.   

Abstract

Biological tissues like intervertebral discs and articular cartilage primarily consist of interstitial fluid, collagen fibrils and negatively charged proteoglycans. Due to the fixed charges of the proteoglycans, the total ion concentration inside the tissue is higher than in the surrounding synovial fluid (cation concentration is higher and the anion concentration is lower). This excess of ion particles leads to an osmotic pressure difference, which causes swelling of the tissue. In the last decade several mechano-electrochemical models, which include this mechanism, have been developed. As these models are complex and computationally expensive, it is only possible to analyze geometrically relatively small problems. Furthermore, there is still no commercial finite element tool that includes such a mechano-electrochemical theory. Lanir (Biorheology, 24, pp. 173-187, 1987) hypothesized that electrolyte flux in articular cartilage can be neglected in mechanical studies. Lanir's hypothesis implies that the swelling behavior of cartilage is only determined by deformation of the solid and by fluid flow. Hence, the response could be described by adding a deformation-dependent pressure term to the standard biphasic equations. Based on this theory we developed a biphasic swelling model. The goal of the study was to test Lanir's hypothesis for a range of material properties. We compared the deformation behavior predicted by the biphasic swelling model and a full mechano-electrochemical model for confined compression and 1D swelling. It was shown that, depending on the material properties, the biphasic swelling model behaves largely the same as the mechano-electrochemical model, with regard to stresses and strains in the tissue following either mechanical or chemical perturbations. Hence, the biphasic swelling model could be an alternative for the more complex mechano-electrochemical model, in those cases where the ion flux itself is not the subject of the study. We propose thumbrules to estimate the correlation between the two models for specific problems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15868798     DOI: 10.1115/1.1835361

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech Eng        ISSN: 0148-0731            Impact factor:   2.097


  14 in total

Review 1.  Multiscale mechanics of articular cartilage: potentials and challenges of coupling musculoskeletal, joint, and microscale computational models.

Authors:  J P Halloran; S Sibole; C C van Donkelaar; M C van Turnhout; C W J Oomens; J A Weiss; F Guilak; A Erdemir
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2012-05-31       Impact factor: 3.934

2.  Osmoviscoelastic finite element model of the intervertebral disc.

Authors:  Yvonne Schroeder; Wouter Wilson; Jacques M Huyghe; Frank P T Baaijens
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-05-25       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  Subject-specific analysis of joint contact mechanics: application to the study of osteoarthritis and surgical planning.

Authors:  Corinne R Henak; Andrew E Anderson; Jeffrey A Weiss
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 2.097

4.  An Anisotropic Multiphysics Model for Intervertebral Disk.

Authors:  Xin Gao; Qiaoqiao Zhu; Weiyong Gu
Journal:  J Appl Mech       Date:  2015-11-09       Impact factor: 2.168

Review 5.  Computational simulation and modeling of the blood-brain barrier pathology.

Authors:  Sergey Shityakov; Carola Y Förster
Journal:  Histochem Cell Biol       Date:  2018-05-02       Impact factor: 4.304

6.  Refinement of elastic, poroelastic, and osmotic tissue properties of intervertebral disks to analyze behavior in compression.

Authors:  Ian A F Stokes; Jeffrey P Laible; Mack G Gardner-Morse; John J Costi; James C Iatridis
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2010-08-14       Impact factor: 3.934

7.  Elastic, permeability and swelling properties of human intervertebral disc tissues: A benchmark for tissue engineering.

Authors:  Daniel H Cortes; Nathan T Jacobs; John F DeLucca; Dawn M Elliott
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2013-12-25       Impact factor: 2.712

Review 8.  A review of the combination of experimental measurements and fibril-reinforced modeling for investigation of articular cartilage and chondrocyte response to loading.

Authors:  Petro Julkunen; Wouter Wilson; Hanna Isaksson; Jukka S Jurvelin; Walter Herzog; Rami K Korhonen
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2013-04-08       Impact factor: 2.238

Review 9.  On the relative relevance of subject-specific geometries and degeneration-specific mechanical properties for the study of cell death in human intervertebral disk models.

Authors:  Andrea Malandrino; José M Pozo; Isaac Castro-Mateos; Alejandro F Frangi; Marc M van Rijsbergen; Keita Ito; Hans-Joachim Wilke; Tien Tuan Dao; Marie-Christine Ho Ba Tho; Jérôme Noailly
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2015-02-11

10.  Inverse poroelasticity as a fundamental mechanism in biomechanics and mechanobiology.

Authors:  Alexander E Ehret; Kevin Bircher; Alberto Stracuzzi; Vita Marina; Manuel Zündel; Edoardo Mazza
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2017-10-17       Impact factor: 14.919

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.