Literature DB >> 1586821

The Bradford community stroke trial: results at six months.

J B Young1, A Forster.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Comparison of day hospital attendance and home physiotherapy for stroke patients leaving hospital to determine which service produces greater functional and social improvement for the patient, reduces emotional stress for the care giver, and lessens the need for community support.
DESIGN: Stratified, randomised trial of stroke patients attending day hospital two days a week or receiving home treatment from a community physiotherapist. The six month assessment results are reported in this paper.
SUBJECTS: Patients over 60 years old resident within the Bradford metropolitan district discharged home after a new stroke with residual disability.
SETTING: Four day hospitals in two health authorities and domiciliary work undertaken by experienced community physiotherapists. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Barthel index, functional ambulatory categories, Motor Club assessment, Frenchay activities index, and Nottingham health profile were used. Carers' stress was indicated by the general health questionnaire. Treatment given and community care provided were recorded.
RESULTS: Of 124 patients recruited, 108 were available for reassessment at six months. Both treatment groups had significantly improved in functional abilities between discharge and six months. The improvements were significantly greater for patients treated at home (Mann-Whitney test; Barthel index, median difference 2 (95% confidence interval 0 to 3) p = 0.01; Motor Club assessment, median difference 2 (1 to 5), p = 0.01). The home treated patients received less treatment (median difference 16 (11 to 21) treatments, p less than 0.001). More than a third of patients in both groups showed depressed mood, and a quarter of care givers were emotionally distressed.
CONCLUSIONS: Home physiotherapy seems to be slightly more effective and more resource efficient than day hospital attendance and should be the preferred rehabilitation method for aftercare of stroke patients. New strategies are needed to address psychosocial function for both patients and care givers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1586821      PMCID: PMC1881935          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.304.6834.1085

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN: 0959-8138


  16 in total

1.  Day hospital and stroke patients.

Authors:  A Forster; J Young
Journal:  Int Disabil Stud       Date:  1989 Oct-Dec

2.  Day hospital rehabilitation--effectiveness and cost in the elderly: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  M A Tucker; J G Davison; S J Ogle
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1984-11-03

3.  A scaled version of the General Health Questionnaire.

Authors:  D P Goldberg; V F Hillier
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  1979-02       Impact factor: 7.723

4.  Travel sickness in patients attending a geriatric day hospital.

Authors:  D Stokoe; G Zuccollo
Journal:  Age Ageing       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 10.668

5.  Use of the Nottingham Health Profile with patients after a stroke.

Authors:  S Ebrahim; D Barer; F Nouri
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 3.710

6.  Social activities after stroke: measurement and natural history using the Frenchay Activities Index.

Authors:  D T Wade; J Legh-Smith; R Langton Hewer
Journal:  Int Rehabil Med       Date:  1985

7.  Controlled trial of a home-care service for acute stroke patients.

Authors:  D T Wade; R Langton-Hewer; C E Skilbeck; D Bainton; C Burns-Cox
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1985-02-09       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Status of stroke patients: a community assessment.

Authors:  S M Schmidt; L M Herman; P Koenig; M Leuze; M K Monahan; R W Stubbers
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 3.966

9.  Effectiveness of a geriatric day hospital.

Authors:  D J Eagle; G H Guyatt; C Patterson; I Turpie; B Sackett; J Singer
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1991-03-15       Impact factor: 8.262

10.  Walking after stroke. Measurement and recovery over the first 3 months.

Authors:  D T Wade; V A Wood; A Heller; J Maggs; R Langton Hewer
Journal:  Scand J Rehabil Med       Date:  1987
View more
  32 in total

Review 1.  A review of health-related quality-of-life measures in stroke.

Authors:  B A Golomb; B G Vickrey; R D Hays
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  The primary care stroke gap.

Authors:  J B Young
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 5.386

3.  'Valuing people'--a new strategy for learning disability for the 21st century: how may it impinge on primary care?

Authors:  G Martin
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 5.386

4.  Stroke rehabilitation: can we do better?

Authors:  A Forster; J Young
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-12-12

Review 5.  [Therapeutic strategies in stroke aftercare. Contents and effects].

Authors:  S Steib; W Schupp
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 1.214

Review 6.  Formal rehabilitation after stroke.

Authors:  N Freemantle; C Pollock; T A Sheldon; J M Mason; F Song; A F Long; S Ibbotson
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1992-06

Review 7.  Services for people with stroke.

Authors:  D T Wade
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1993-12

8.  Day hospitals for elderly people.

Authors:  J R Gladman
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-07-04

9.  Specialist rehabilitation after stroke.

Authors:  J Gladman; D Barer; P Langhorne
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-06-29

10.  Stroke services in general practice--are they satisfactory?

Authors:  A F Bisset; C Macduff; R Chesson; J Maitland
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 5.386

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.