Literature DB >> 15868075

Duodenum preservation in pancreatic head resection to maintain pancreatic exocrine function (determined by pancreatic function diagnostant test and cholecystokinin secretion).

Koji Ito1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/
PURPOSE: Organ-preserving surgery, such as pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy (PPPD), duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection (DPPHR), or medial pancreatectomy (MP), is one of the recent advances in pancreatic surgery. There was a previous report that preservation of the duodenum maintained pancreatic function. However, concerning the resected pancreas, patients were divided into two groups; one group included pancreatic head resections such as Whipple, PPPD, and complete DPPHR, and the other group included MP that removed only the pancreatic neck and preserved the pancreatic head and distal pancreas. The present study was designed to clarify the significance of duodenum preservation, in comparison with duodenum removal, in patients with pancreatic head resection, in terms of pancreatic function, determined by a pancreatic function diagnostant (PFD) test and cholecystokinin (CCK) secretion.
METHODS: The subjects were 61 patients (10 with Whipple, 41 with PPPD, and 10 with complete DPPHR). PFD tests and postprandial plasma CCK secretion were used for evaluation.
RESULTS: There was a significant difference between pre- and postoperative PFD values in the patients who received Whipple or PPPD; however, there was no difference in those who had complete DPPHR. Concerning the postoperative PFD value, complete DPPHR was superior to Whipple and PPPD. Regarding postprandial CCK secretion, the pre- and postoperative values were significantly different in the patients with Whipple or PPPD, but there was no difference in those with complete DPPHR. Comparing the three kinds of operations, complete DPPHR was superior to the other two procedures in its maintenance of pancreatic function. There was the significant correlation between CCK and PFD in our patients in the Spearman Rank Correlation (P < 0.0029) and Fisher's r to z (P < 0.0058).
CONCLUSIONS: When pre- and postoperative pancreatic exocrine function and postprandial CCK secretion were measured in patients with pancreatic head resection, it was found that preservation of the entire duodenum was an important factor for maintaining pancreatic function.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15868075     DOI: 10.1007/s00534-004-0954-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg        ISSN: 0944-1166


  10 in total

Review 1.  [Duodenum-preserving total pancreatic head resection : an organ-sparing operation technique for cystic neoplasms and non-invasive malignant tumors].

Authors:  H G Beger; M Siech; B Poch
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 0.955

2.  Parenchyma-sparing pancreatectomies for benign or border-line tumors of the pancreas.

Authors:  Cosimo Sperti; Valentina Beltrame; Anna Caterina Milanetto; Margherita Moro; Sergio Pedrazzoli
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2010-06-15

Review 3.  Limited surgery for benign tumours of the pancreas: a systematic review.

Authors:  H G Beger; M Siech; B Poch; B Mayer; M H Schoenberg
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Gastrointestinal symptoms before and after total pancreatectomy with islet autotransplantation: the role of pancreatic enzyme dosing and adherence.

Authors:  Jill Crosby; Melena D Bellin; David M Radosevich; Srinath Chinnakotla; Ty B Dunn; Timothy L Pruett; Martin L Freeman; Greg J Beilman; Sarah J Schwarzenberg
Journal:  Pancreas       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 3.327

Review 5.  Parenchyma-Sparing, Limited Pancreatic Head Resection for Benign Tumors and Low-Risk Periampullary Cancer--a Systematic Review.

Authors:  Hans G Beger; Benjamin Mayer; Bettina M Rau
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2015-11-02       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  Pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy: exocrine pancreatic insufficiency after gastrointestinal surgery.

Authors:  J Enrique Domínguez-Muñoz
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.647

7.  Duodenum-preserving total pancreatic head resection for benign cystic neoplastic lesions.

Authors:  Hans G Beger; Michael Schwarz; Bertram Poch
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2012-07-12       Impact factor: 3.452

8.  The daily practice of pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy after pancreatic surgery: a northern European survey: enzyme replacement after surgery.

Authors:  Edmée C M Sikkens; Djuna L Cahen; Casper van Eijck; Ernst J Kuipers; Marco J Bruno
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2012-06-19       Impact factor: 3.452

9.  Risk factors deteriorating severe exocrine pancreatic insufficiency measured by stool elastase after pancreatoduodenectomy and the risk factors for weight loss.

Authors:  Ara Cho; Hongbeom Kim; Hee Ju Sohn; Mirang Lee; Yoon Hyung Kang; Hyeong Seok Kim; Youngmin Han; Jae Seung Kang; Wooil Kwon; Jin-Young Jang
Journal:  Ann Surg Treat Res       Date:  2022-01-03       Impact factor: 1.859

10.  Russian Consensus on Exo- and Endocrine Pancreatic Insufficiency After Surgical Treatment.

Authors:  Igor E Khatkov; Igor V Maev; Sayyar R Abdulkhalov; Sergey A Alekseenko; Ruslan B Allikhanov; Igor G Bakulin; Natalia V Bakulina; Andrey U Baranovskiy; Ekaterina V Beloborodova; Elena A Belousova; Sergey E Voskanyan; Lyudmila V Vinokurova; Vladimir B Grinevich; Vladimir V Darvin; Elena A Dubtsova; Tatiana G Dyuzheva; Vyacheslav I Egorov; Mikhail G Efanov; Roman E Izrailov; Vyacheslav L Korobka; Bogdan N Kotiv; Nikolay Yu Kokhanenko; Yury A Kucheryavy; Maria A Livzan; Vladimir K Lyadov; Karine A Nikolskaya; Marina F Osipenko; Victor D Pasechnikov; Ekaterina Yu Plotnikova; Oleg A Sablin; Vladimir I Simanenkov; Victor V Tsvirkun; Vladislav V Tsukanov; Alexey V Shabunin; Dmitry S Bordin; Professional Medical Society Pancreatic Club Russia
Journal:  Turk J Gastroenterol       Date:  2021-03       Impact factor: 1.852

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.