Literature DB >> 1586755

Clinical methods of goniometry: a comparative study.

J Goodwin1, C Clark, J Deakes, D Burdon, C Lawrence.   

Abstract

This investigation compared the reliability and interchangeable use of three currently available goniometers--a universal goniometer, a fluid goniometer, and an electrogoniometer. Three consecutive readings of the active range of movement of the right elbow joint were taken from each of 23 healthy female volunteers; three experienced observers each used each type of goniometer on two occasions. A balanced experimental design was used to eliminate order effects with respect to subject, tester, or goniometer, and a rigid protocol was employed to reduce error due to diurnal or methodological variations. The results show that there are significant differences between the goniometers used, the testers, and the replications. Significant interaction effects also exist between the goniometers and the occasion, the goniometers and the testers, and the testers and replications. The data suggest that the interchangeable use of different types of goniometer in a clinical setting is inadvisable.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1586755     DOI: 10.3109/09638289209166420

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Disabil Rehabil        ISSN: 0963-8288            Impact factor:   3.033


  14 in total

1.  Validity of goniometric elbow measurements: comparative study with a radiographic method.

Authors:  Julien Chapleau; Fanny Canet; Yvan Petit; G-Yves Laflamme; Dominique M Rouleau
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-07-21       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  New method of measuring wrist joint position sense avoiding cutaneous and visual inputs.

Authors:  Andre Gay; Kimberly Harbst; Kenton R Kaufman; Diana K Hansen; Edward R Laskowski; Richard A Berger
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2010-02-10       Impact factor: 4.262

3.  Long-term effect of pulsed high-intensity laser therapy in the treatment of post-mastectomy pain syndrome: a double blind, placebo-control, randomized study.

Authors:  Anwar Abdelgayed Ebid; Ahmed Mohamed El-Sodany
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2015-06-27       Impact factor: 3.161

4.  Wrist motion analysis in scaphoid nonunion.

Authors:  S Gehrmann; T Roeger; R Kaufmann; A Schaedle; T Lögters; J Windolf
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2016-01-27       Impact factor: 3.693

Review 5.  The reliability and validity of goniometric elbow measurements in adults: A systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Suzanne F van Rijn; Elisa L Zwerus; Koen Lm Koenraadt; Wilco Ch Jacobs; Michel Pj van den Bekerom; Denise Eygendaal
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2018-06-03

6.  Elbow joint active replication in college pitchers following simulated game throwing: an exploratory study.

Authors:  Robert Manske; Mark Stovak; Kara Cox; Barbara Smith
Journal:  Sports Health       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 3.843

7.  Measuring oscillating walking paths with a LIDAR.

Authors:  Mercè Teixidó; Tomàs Pallejà; Marcel Tresanchez; Miquel Nogués; Jordi Palacín
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2011-05-06       Impact factor: 3.576

8.  Motion patterns in activities of daily living: 3- year longitudinal follow-up after total shoulder arthroplasty using an optical 3D motion analysis system.

Authors:  Michael W Maier; Mirjam Niklasch; Thomas Dreher; Felix Zeifang; Oliver Rettig; Matthias C Klotz; Sebastian I Wolf; Philip Kasten
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2014-07-21       Impact factor: 2.362

9.  Inertial sensors as measurement tools of elbow range of motion in gerontology.

Authors:  G Sacco; J M Turpin; A Marteu; C Sakarovitch; B Teboul; L Boscher; P Brocker; P Robert; O Guerin
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2015-02-23       Impact factor: 4.458

10.  Usage Position and Virtual Keyboard Design Affect Upper-Body Kinematics, Discomfort, and Usability during Prolonged Tablet Typing.

Authors:  Ming-I Brandon Lin; Ruei-Hong Hong; Jer-Hao Chang; Xin-Min Ke
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-12-02       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.