BACKGROUND: Treatment guidelines recommend drug treatment to prevent fractures for some postmenopausal women who have low bone mass (osteopenia) but do not have osteoporosis or a history of clinical fractures. OBJECTIVE: To estimate the societal costs and health benefits of alendronate drug treatment to prevent fractures in postmenopausal women with osteopenia. DESIGN: Markov model with 8 health states: no fracture, post-distal forearm fracture, post-clinical vertebral fracture, post-radiographic (but clinically inapparent) vertebral fracture, post-hip fracture, post-hip and vertebral fractures, post-other fracture, and death. DATA SOURCES: Population-based studies of age-specific fracture rates and costs, prospectively measured estimates of disutility after fractures, and the Fracture Intervention Trial of alendronate versus placebo to prevent fracture. TARGET POPULATION: Postmenopausal women 55 to 75 years of age with femoral neck T-scores between -1.5 and -2.4. TIME HORIZON: Lifetime. PERSPECTIVE: Societal. INTERVENTIONS: Five years of alendronate therapy or no drug treatment. OUTCOME MEASURES: Costs, quality-adjusted life-years, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios. RESULTS OF BASE-CASE ANALYSIS: For women with no additional fracture risk factors, the cost per quality-adjusted life-year gained ranged from 70,000 dollars to 332,000 dollars, depending on age and femoral neck bone density. RESULTS OF SENSITIVITY ANALYSES: Results were sensitive to changes in fracture risk reduction attributable to alendronate and alendronate cost. LIMITATIONS: Results apply only to postmenopausal white women residing in the United States. CONCLUSION:Alendronate therapy for postmenopausal women with femoral neck T-scores better than -2.5 and no history of clinical fractures or other bone mineral density-independent risk factors for fracture is not cost-effective, assuming U.S. costs of alendronate and currently available estimates of alendronate efficacy in osteopenic women.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Treatment guidelines recommend drug treatment to prevent fractures for some postmenopausal women who have low bone mass (osteopenia) but do not have osteoporosis or a history of clinical fractures. OBJECTIVE: To estimate the societal costs and health benefits of alendronate drug treatment to prevent fractures in postmenopausal women with osteopenia. DESIGN: Markov model with 8 health states: no fracture, post-distal forearm fracture, post-clinical vertebral fracture, post-radiographic (but clinically inapparent) vertebral fracture, post-hip fracture, post-hip and vertebral fractures, post-other fracture, and death. DATA SOURCES: Population-based studies of age-specific fracture rates and costs, prospectively measured estimates of disutility after fractures, and the Fracture Intervention Trial of alendronate versus placebo to prevent fracture. TARGET POPULATION: Postmenopausal women 55 to 75 years of age with femoral neck T-scores between -1.5 and -2.4. TIME HORIZON: Lifetime. PERSPECTIVE: Societal. INTERVENTIONS: Five years of alendronate therapy or no drug treatment. OUTCOME MEASURES: Costs, quality-adjusted life-years, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios. RESULTS OF BASE-CASE ANALYSIS: For women with no additional fracture risk factors, the cost per quality-adjusted life-year gained ranged from 70,000 dollars to 332,000 dollars, depending on age and femoral neck bone density. RESULTS OF SENSITIVITY ANALYSES: Results were sensitive to changes in fracture risk reduction attributable to alendronate and alendronate cost. LIMITATIONS: Results apply only to postmenopausal white women residing in the United States. CONCLUSION:Alendronate therapy for postmenopausal women with femoral neck T-scores better than -2.5 and no history of clinical fractures or other bone mineral density-independent risk factors for fracture is not cost-effective, assuming U.S. costs of alendronate and currently available estimates of alendronate efficacy in osteopenicwomen.
Authors: S R Majumdar; D A Lier; B H Rowe; A S Russell; F A McAlister; W P Maksymowych; D A Hanley; D W Morrish; J A Johnson Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2010-09-29 Impact factor: 4.507
Authors: Kathryn M Ryder; Ronald I Shorr; Frances A Tylavsky; Andrew J Bush; Douglas C Bauer; Eleanor M Simonsick; Elsa S Strotmeyer; Tamara B Harris Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2006-06 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Kathryn M Ryder; Steven R Cummings; Lisa Palermo; Suzanne Satterfield; Douglas C Bauer; Adrianne C Feldstein; John T Schousboe; Ann V Schwartz; Kristine Ensrud Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2008-05-06 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: B Dawson-Hughes; A N A Tosteson; L J Melton; S Baim; M J Favus; S Khosla; R L Lindsay Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2008-02-22 Impact factor: 4.507