PURPOSE: Vitamin D seems to exert a protective effect against common cancers, although this does not correlate with circulating levels of active 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 [1,25(OH)2D3], indicating a more localized activation of vitamin D. The aim of this study was to investigate the significance of this in breast cancer. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Quantitative reverse transcription-PCR analysis of mRNA expression was carried out for the vitamin D-activating enzyme 1alpha-hydroxylase, the catabolic enzyme 24-hydroxylase, and the vitamin D receptor in 41 tumors and paired nonneoplastic tissue as well as breast cancer cell lines. Immunohistochemistry was used to assess 1alpha-hydroxylase protein expression, and enzyme assays were used to quantify vitamin D metabolism. RESULTS: Expression of mRNA for 1alpha-hydroxylase (27-fold; P < 5 x 10(-11)), vitamin D receptor (7-fold; P < 1.5 x 10(-8)), and 24-hydroxylase (4-fold; P < 0.02) was higher in breast tumors. 1alpha-Hydroxylase enzyme activity was also higher in tumors (44.3 +/- 11.4 versus 12.4 +/- 4.8 fmol/h/mg protein in nonneoplastic tissue; P < 0.05). However, production of inactive 1,24,25-trihydroxyvitamin D3 was also significantly higher in tumors (84.8 +/- 11.7 versus 33.6 +/- 8.5 fmol/h/mg protein; P < 0.01). Antisense inhibition of 24-hydroxylase in vitro increased antiproliferative responses to 1,25(OH)2D3. CONCLUSION: These data indicate that the vitamin D-activating enzyme 1alpha-hydroxylase is up-regulated in breast tumors. However, dysregulated expression of 24-hydroxylase seems to abrogate the effects of local 1,25(OH)2D3 production in tumors by catalyzing catabolism to less active vitamin D metabolites. The enzymes involved in autocrine metabolism of vitamin D in breast tissue may therefore provide important targets for both the prevention and treatment of breast cancer.
PURPOSE: Vitamin D seems to exert a protective effect against common cancers, although this does not correlate with circulating levels of active 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 [1,25(OH)2D3], indicating a more localized activation of vitamin D. The aim of this study was to investigate the significance of this in breast cancer. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Quantitative reverse transcription-PCR analysis of mRNA expression was carried out for the vitamin D-activating enzyme 1alpha-hydroxylase, the catabolic enzyme 24-hydroxylase, and the vitamin D receptor in 41 tumors and paired nonneoplastic tissue as well as breast cancer cell lines. Immunohistochemistry was used to assess 1alpha-hydroxylase protein expression, and enzyme assays were used to quantify vitamin D metabolism. RESULTS: Expression of mRNA for 1alpha-hydroxylase (27-fold; P < 5 x 10(-11)), vitamin D receptor (7-fold; P < 1.5 x 10(-8)), and 24-hydroxylase (4-fold; P < 0.02) was higher in breast tumors. 1alpha-Hydroxylase enzyme activity was also higher in tumors (44.3 +/- 11.4 versus 12.4 +/- 4.8 fmol/h/mg protein in nonneoplastic tissue; P < 0.05). However, production of inactive 1,24,25-trihydroxyvitamin D3 was also significantly higher in tumors (84.8 +/- 11.7 versus 33.6 +/- 8.5 fmol/h/mg protein; P < 0.01). Antisense inhibition of 24-hydroxylase in vitro increased antiproliferative responses to 1,25(OH)2D3. CONCLUSION: These data indicate that the vitamin D-activating enzyme 1alpha-hydroxylase is up-regulated in breast tumors. However, dysregulated expression of 24-hydroxylase seems to abrogate the effects of local 1,25(OH)2D3 production in tumors by catalyzing catabolism to less active vitamin D metabolites. The enzymes involved in autocrine metabolism of vitamin D in breast tissue may therefore provide important targets for both the prevention and treatment of breast cancer.
Authors: Jamila Al-Azhri; Yali Zhang; Wiam Bshara; Gary Zirpoli; Susan E McCann; Thaer Khoury; Carl D Morrison; Stephen B Edge; Christine B Ambrosone; Song Yao Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2016-07-12 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Henrik C Horváth; Péter Lakatos; János P Kósa; Krisztián Bácsi; Katalin Borka; Giovanna Bises; Thomas Nittke; Pamela A Hershberger; Gábor Speer; Enikö Kállay Journal: J Histochem Cytochem Date: 2009-11-09 Impact factor: 2.479
Authors: Xinjian Peng; Michael Hawthorne; Avani Vaishnav; René St-Arnaud; Rajendra G Mehta Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2008-01-20 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Sif Hansdottir; Martha M Monick; Sara L Hinde; Nina Lovan; Dwight C Look; Gary W Hunninghake Journal: J Immunol Date: 2008-11-15 Impact factor: 5.422
Authors: S Karami; P Brennan; M Navratilova; D Mates; D Zaridze; V Janout; H Kollarova; V Bencko; V Matveev; N Szesznia-Dabrowska; I Holcatova; M Yeager; S Chanock; N Rothman; P Boffetta; W-H Chow; L E Moore Journal: Int J Endocrinol Date: 2009-11-05 Impact factor: 3.257