Literature DB >> 15867241

Temozolomide pharmacodynamics in patients with metastatic melanoma: dna damage and activity of repair enzymes O6-alkylguanine alkyltransferase and poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1.

E Ruth Plummer1, Mark R Middleton, Christopher Jones, Anna Olsen, Ian Hickson, Peter McHugh, Geoffrey P Margison, Gail McGown, Mary Thorncroft, Amanda J Watson, Alan V Boddy, A Hilary Calvert, Adrian L Harris, David R Newell, Nicola J Curtin.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Temozolomide, a DNA methylating agent used to treat melanoma, induces DNA damage, which is repaired by O6-alkylguanine alkyltransferase (ATase) and poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 (PARP-1)-dependent base excision repair. The current study was done to define the effect of temozolomide on DNA integrity and relevant repair enzymes as a prelude to a phase I trial of the combination of temozolomide with a PARP inhibitor. EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: Temozolomide (200 mg/m2 oral administration) was given to 12 patients with metastatic malignant melanoma. Peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBL) were analyzed for PARP activity, DNA single-strand breakage, ATase levels, and DNA methylation. PARP activity was also measured in tumor biopsies from 9 of 12 patients and in PBLs from healthy volunteers.
RESULTS: Temozolomide pharmacokinetics were consistent with previous reports. Temozolomide therapy caused a substantial and sustained elevation of N7-methylguanine levels, a modest and sustained reduction in ATase activity, and a modest and transient increase in DNA strand breaks and PARP activity in PBLs. PARP-1 activity in tumor homogenates was variable (828 +/- 599 pmol PAR monomer/mg protein) and was not consistently affected by temozolomide treatment.
CONCLUSIONS: The effect of temozolomide reported here are consistent with those documented in previous studies with temozolomide and similar drug, dacarbazine, demonstrating that a representative patient population was investigated. Furthermore, PARP activity was not inhibited by temozolomide treatment and this newly validated pharmacodynamic assay is therefore suitable for use in a proof-of-principle phase I trial a PARP-1 inhibitor in combination with temozolomide.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15867241     DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-04-2353

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  30 in total

1.  The ups and downs of DNA repair biomarkers for PARP inhibitor therapies.

Authors:  Xiaozhe Wang; David T Weaver
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2010-01-03       Impact factor: 6.166

2.  Acquisition of temozolomide chemoresistance in gliomas leads to remodeling of mitochondrial electron transport chain.

Authors:  Claudia R Oliva; Susan E Nozell; Anne Diers; Samuel G McClugage; Jann N Sarkaria; James M Markert; Victor M Darley-Usmar; Shannon M Bailey; G Yancey Gillespie; Aimee Landar; Corinne E Griguer
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2010-09-24       Impact factor: 5.157

3.  A dual-regulated oncolytic adenovirus expressing interleukin-24 sensitizes melanoma cells to temozolomide via the induction of apoptosis.

Authors:  Guan Jiang; Ai-Jun Jiang; Qian Cheng; Hui Tian; Lian-Tao Li; Jun-Nian Zheng
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2013-02-21

4.  Ovarian Cancers Harbor Defects in Nonhomologous End Joining Resulting in Resistance to Rucaparib.

Authors:  Aiste McCormick; Peter Donoghue; Michelle Dixon; Richard O'Sullivan; Rachel L O'Donnell; James Murray; Angelika Kaufmann; Nicola J Curtin; Richard J Edmondson
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2016-10-04       Impact factor: 12.531

5.  PET of Poly (ADP-Ribose) Polymerase Activity in Cancer: Preclinical Assessment and First In-Human Studies.

Authors:  Loren S Michel; Samantha Dyroff; Frank J Brooks; Katherine J Spayd; Sora Lim; Jacquelyn T Engle; Sharon Phillips; Benjamin Tan; Andrea Wang-Gillam; Christopher Bognar; Wenhua Chu; Dong Zhou; Robert H Mach; Richard Laforest; Delphine L Chen
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2016-11-14       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Effective sensitization of temozolomide by ABT-888 is lost with development of temozolomide resistance in glioblastoma xenograft lines.

Authors:  Michelle J Clarke; Evan A Mulligan; Patrick T Grogan; Ann C Mladek; Brett L Carlson; Mark A Schroeder; Nicola J Curtin; Zhenkun Lou; Paul A Decker; Wenting Wu; E Ruth Plummer; Jann N Sarkaria
Journal:  Mol Cancer Ther       Date:  2009-01-27       Impact factor: 6.261

7.  Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 polymorphisms, expression and activity in selected human tumour cell lines.

Authors:  T Zaremba; P Ketzer; M Cole; S Coulthard; E R Plummer; N J Curtin
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2009-06-30       Impact factor: 7.640

8.  Central nervous system penetration and enhancement of temozolomide activity in childhood medulloblastoma models by poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor AG-014699.

Authors:  R A Daniel; A L Rozanska; E A Mulligan; Y Drew; H D Thomas; D J Castelbuono; Z Hostomsky; E R Plummer; D A Tweddle; A V Boddy; S C Clifford; N J Curtin
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2010-10-26       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  Phase I study of the poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor, AG014699, in combination with temozolomide in patients with advanced solid tumors.

Authors:  Ruth Plummer; Christopher Jones; Mark Middleton; Richard Wilson; Jeffrey Evans; Anna Olsen; Nicola Curtin; Alan Boddy; Peter McHugh; David Newell; Adrian Harris; Patrick Johnson; Heidi Steinfeldt; Raz Dewji; Diane Wang; Lesley Robson; Hilary Calvert
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2008-12-01       Impact factor: 12.531

10.  Evaluation of the pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of the PARP inhibitor olaparib: a phase I multicentre trial in patients scheduled for elective breast cancer surgery.

Authors:  Nigel Bundred; Janis Gardovskis; Janusz Jaskiewicz; Janis Eglitis; Viktor Paramonov; Peter McCormack; Helen Swaisland; Maria Cavallin; Tony Parry; James Carmichael; J Michael Dixon
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2013-01-13       Impact factor: 3.850

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.