PURPOSE: YKL-40 is a secreted protein that has been reported to be overexpressed in epithelial cancers and gliomas, although its function is unknown. Previous data in a smaller sample set suggested that YKL-40 was a marker associated with a poorer clinical outcome and a genetically defined subgroup of glioblastoma. Here we test these findings in a larger series of patients with glioblastoma, and in particular, determine if tumor YKL-40 expression is associated with radiation response. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Patients (n=147) with subtotal resections were studied for imaging-assessed changes in tumor size in serial studies following radiation therapy. An additional set (n=140) of glioblastoma patients who underwent a gross-total resection was tested to validate the survival association and extend them to patients with minimal residual disease. RESULTS: In the subtotal resection group, higher YKL-40 expression was significantly associated with poorer radiation response, shorter time to progression and shorter overall survival. The association of higher YKL-40 expression with poorer survival was validated in the gross-total resection group. In multivariate analysis with both groups combined (n = 287), YKL-40 was an independent predictor of survival after adjusting for patient age, performance status, and extent of resection. YKL-40 expression was also compared with genetically defined subsets of glioblastoma by assessing epidermal growth factor receptor amplification and loss at chromosome 10q, two of the common recurring aberrations in these tumors, using fluorescent in situ hybridization. YKL-40 was significantly associated with 10q loss. CONCLUSIONS: The findings implicate YKL-40 as an important marker of therapeutic response and genetic subtype in glioblastomas and suggest that it may play an oncogenic role in these tumors.
PURPOSE:YKL-40 is a secreted protein that has been reported to be overexpressed in epithelial cancers and gliomas, although its function is unknown. Previous data in a smaller sample set suggested that YKL-40 was a marker associated with a poorer clinical outcome and a genetically defined subgroup of glioblastoma. Here we test these findings in a larger series of patients with glioblastoma, and in particular, determine if tumorYKL-40 expression is associated with radiation response. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN:Patients (n=147) with subtotal resections were studied for imaging-assessed changes in tumor size in serial studies following radiation therapy. An additional set (n=140) of glioblastomapatients who underwent a gross-total resection was tested to validate the survival association and extend them to patients with minimal residual disease. RESULTS: In the subtotal resection group, higher YKL-40 expression was significantly associated with poorer radiation response, shorter time to progression and shorter overall survival. The association of higher YKL-40 expression with poorer survival was validated in the gross-total resection group. In multivariate analysis with both groups combined (n = 287), YKL-40 was an independent predictor of survival after adjusting for patient age, performance status, and extent of resection. YKL-40 expression was also compared with genetically defined subsets of glioblastoma by assessing epidermal growth factor receptor amplification and loss at chromosome 10q, two of the common recurring aberrations in these tumors, using fluorescent in situ hybridization. YKL-40 was significantly associated with 10q loss. CONCLUSIONS: The findings implicate YKL-40 as an important marker of therapeutic response and genetic subtype in glioblastomas and suggest that it may play an oncogenic role in these tumors.
Authors: Fabio M Iwamoto; Andreas F Hottinger; Sasan Karimi; Elyn Riedel; Jocelynn Dantis; Maryam Jahdi; Katherine S Panageas; Andrew B Lassman; Lauren E Abrey; Martin Fleisher; Lisa M DeAngelis; Eric C Holland; Adília Hormigo Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2011-08-10 Impact factor: 12.300
Authors: Krishna P L Bhat; Veerakumar Balasubramaniyan; Brian Vaillant; Ravesanker Ezhilarasan; Howard Colman; Erik P Sulman; Kenneth Aldape; Karlijn Hummelink; Faith Hollingsworth; Khalida Wani; Lindsey Heathcock; Johanna D James; Lindsey D Goodman; Siobhan Conroy; Lihong Long; Nina Lelic; Suzhen Wang; Joy Gumin; Divya Raj; Yoshinori Kodama; Aditya Raghunathan; Adriana Olar; Kaushal Joshi; Christopher E Pelloski; Amy Heimberger; Se Hoon Kim; Daniel P Cahill; Ganesh Rao; Wilfred F A Den Dunnen; Hendrikus W G M Boddeke; Heidi S Phillips; Ichiro Nakano; Frederick F Lang Journal: Cancer Cell Date: 2013-08-29 Impact factor: 31.743
Authors: Yue Liu; Fei Ye; Kazunari Yamada; Jonathan L Tso; Yibei Zhang; David H Nguyen; Qinghua Dong; Horacio Soto; Jinny Choe; Anna Dembo; Hayley Wheeler; Ascia Eskin; Ingrid Schmid; William H Yong; Paul S Mischel; Timothy F Cloughesy; Harley I Kornblum; Stanley F Nelson; Linda M Liau; Cho-Lea Tso Journal: Mol Cancer Res Date: 2011-10-19 Impact factor: 5.852
Authors: Rong Shao; Ralph Francescone; Nipaporn Ngernyuang; Brooke Bentley; Sherry L Taylor; Luis Moral; Wei Yan Journal: Carcinogenesis Date: 2013-11-26 Impact factor: 4.944
Authors: H M C Shantha Kumara; David Gaita; Hiromichi Miyagaki; Xiaohong Yan; Sonali Ac Hearth; Linda Njoh; Vesna Cekic; Richard L Whelan Journal: World J Gastrointest Oncol Date: 2016-08-15
Authors: Estrid V S Høgdall; Merete Ringsholt; Claus K Høgdall; Ib Jarle Christensen; Julia S Johansen; Susanne K Kjaer; Jan Blaakaer; Lene Ostenfeld-Møller; Paul A Price; Lise H Christensen Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2009-01-09 Impact factor: 4.430