Literature DB >> 15867037

Early death, morbidity, and need of treatment among extremely premature infants.

Trond Markestad1, Per Ivar Kaaresen, Arild Rønnestad, Hallvard Reigstad, Kristin Lossius, Sverre Medbø, Gro Zanussi, Inger Elise Engelund, Rolv Skjaerven, Lorentz M Irgens.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine outcomes, in terms of perinatal and early death, need for treatment, and morbidity at the time of discharge home, among extremely preterm infants.
DESIGN: A prospective observational study of all infants with a gestational age (GA) of 22 to 27 completed weeks or a birth weight of 500 to 999 g who were born in Norway in 1999 and 2000.
RESULTS: Of 636 births, 174 infants (27%) were stillborn or died in the delivery room, 86 (14%) died in the NICU, and 376 (59%) were discharged from the hospital. The risk of being registered as stillborn or not being resuscitated increased with decreasing GA below 25 weeks. The survival rates for all births and for infants admitted to a NICU were, respectively, 0% for <23 weeks, 16% and 39% for 23 weeks, 44% and 60% for 24 weeks, 66% and 80% for 25 weeks, 72% and 84% for 26 weeks, 82% and 93% for 27 weeks, and 69% and 90% for >27 weeks. For the survivors, days of mechanical ventilation decreased from a median of 37 days to 3 days and the proportion in need of oxygen at 36 weeks' postconceptional age decreased from 67% to 26% at 23 and 27 weeks' GA, respectively. At 40 weeks' postconceptional age, the respective figures were 11% and 6%. The proportion with retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) requiring treatment decreased from 33% for GA of 23 weeks to 0% for >25 weeks. Periventricular hemorrhage of more than grade 2 occurred for 6% of the survivors and significant periventricular leukomalacia occurred for 5%, with no significant association with GA. The proportion of survivors without severe neurosensory or pulmonary morbidity increased from 44% for 23 weeks' to 86% for 27 weeks' GA. Apart from ROP, the morbidity rate was not associated with GA.
CONCLUSIONS: The survival rate was high and the morbidity rate at discharge home was low in the present study, compared with previous population-based studies. With the exception of ROP, the morbidity rates among the survivors were not higher at the lowest GAs, possibly because withholding treatment was considered more acceptable for the most immature infants. The need for intensive care increased markedly for survivors with the lowest GAs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15867037     DOI: 10.1542/peds.2004-1482

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatrics        ISSN: 0031-4005            Impact factor:   7.124


  63 in total

Review 1.  Outcome of extreme prematurity: as information increases so do the dilemmas.

Authors:  J L Watts; S Saigal
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 5.747

Review 2.  Retinopathy of prematurity.

Authors:  Ann Hellström; Lois E H Smith; Olaf Dammann
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2013-06-17       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Survival of extremely premature babies in a geographically defined population: prospective cohort study of 1994-9 compared with 2000-5.

Authors:  David J Field; Jon S Dorling; Bradley N Manktelow; Elizabeth S Draper
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2008-05-09

4.  Neonatal outcomes of very preterm infants admitted to a tertiary center in Lithuania between the years 2003 and 2005.

Authors:  Rita Jakuskiene; Brigitte Vollmer; Viktoras Saferis; Dalia Daugeliene
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2011-03-15       Impact factor: 3.183

5.  Living in hope and desperate for a miracle: NICU nurses perceptions of parental anguish.

Authors:  Janet Green
Journal:  J Relig Health       Date:  2015-04

6.  Neonatal outcome of extremely preterm Asian infants ⩽28 weeks over a decade in the new millennium.

Authors:  P Agarwal; B Sriram; V S Rajadurai
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2015-02-05       Impact factor: 2.521

7.  Mid-childhood outcomes after pre-viable preterm premature rupture of membranes.

Authors:  M H Bentsen; E Satrell; H Reigstad; S L Johnsen; M Vollsæter; O D Røksund; G Greve; A Berg; T Markestad; T Halvorsen
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2017-06-29       Impact factor: 2.521

8.  Health related quality of life after extremely preterm birth: a matched controlled cohort study.

Authors:  Bente J Vederhus; Trond Markestad; Geir E Eide; Marit Graue; Thomas Halvorsen
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2010-05-23       Impact factor: 3.186

9.  Prenatal care utilization for mothers from low-income areas of New Mexico, 1989-1999.

Authors:  Michael A Schillaci; Howard Waitzkin; E Ann Carson; Sandra J Romain
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-09-17       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Risk factors and prevention for surgical intestinal disorders in extremely low birth weight infants.

Authors:  Masaya Yamoto; Yusuke Nakazawa; Koji Fukumoto; Hiromu Miyake; Hideaki Nakajima; Akinori Sekioka; Akiyoshi Nomura; Kei Ooyama; Yutaka Yamada; Katsushi Nogami; Yuko Van; Chisako Furuta; Reiji Nakano; Yasuhiko Tanaka; Naoto Urushihara
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2016-07-26       Impact factor: 1.827

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.