Literature DB >> 15867004

Variability and laboratory factors affecting the sperm chromatin structure assay in human semen.

Gry B Boe-Hansen1, Annette K Ersbøll, Preben Christensen.   

Abstract

During the past decade, the sperm chromatin structure assay (SCSA) has become an important tool for assessing semen quality in the human andrology laboratory. The SCSA uses the metachromatic properties of the fluorescent dye acridine orange (AO) in combination with flow cytometry to determine the sperm DNA susceptibility to denaturation in situ. The objective of this study was to evaluate laboratory factors affecting the SCSA and the variation between replicates. Semen ejaculates from 3 healthy volunteers were analyzed using the SCSA protocol as described by Evenson and Jost (2000), determining the X-mean, Y-mean, DNA fragmentation index (DFI), standard deviation of DFI (SD-DFI), and high DNA stainability (HDS). In experiment 1, the effects of thawing time, time of day, day, laboratory technician, donor, and incubation period before analysis were investigated. In experiment 2, the effects of sheath fluid, AO equilibration buffer, day, laboratory technician, donor, and incubation period before analysis were investigated. A significant difference was found between the 3 donors with respect to the X-mean, Y-mean, DFI, SD-DFI, and HDS. It was shown that incubation of the semen samples on ice postthaw had a significant effect on the X-mean, Y-mean, DFI, and SD-DFI. The laboratory technician conducting the analysis accounted for up to 15.4% for the variation of the SCSA measurements. The time of day affected the variation for the Y-mean (23.5% of the total variation of the Y-mean), and the day affected the variation for the X-mean (82.8% of the total variation of the X-mean). Incubation on ice for 5 to 25 minutes postthaw had a significant effect on the DFI and SD-DFI in both experiments. This study shows that several protocol steps in the SCSA affect the results obtained from the assay. Precise protocol description and standardization of the SCSA are therefore essential to achieve high agreement within and between different laboratories.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15867004     DOI: 10.2164/jandrol.04056

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Androl        ISSN: 0196-3635


  7 in total

1.  The effects of vaginal lubricants on sperm function: an in vitro analysis.

Authors:  Alex Mowat; Cora Newton; Clare Boothroyd; Kristy Demmers; Steven Fleming
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2014-01-05       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Preparation and incubation conditions affect the DNA integrity of ejaculated human spermatozoa.

Authors:  Rieko Matsuura; Takumi Takeuchi; Atsumi Yoshida
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2010-06-21       Impact factor: 3.285

3.  Nuclear DNA Fragmentation in Boar Spermatozoa: Measurement Methods and Reproductive Performance Implications.

Authors:  Raquel Ausejo; Juan Manuel Martínez; Noelia Mendoza; Alfonso Bolarin; M Teresa Tejedor; Maria Victoria Falceto
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2022-06-30

4.  Testing of sperm DNA damage and clinical recommendations.

Authors:  Preben Christensen; Peter Humaidan
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2017-09

5.  Sperm DNA fragmentation index does not correlate with blastocyst aneuploidy or morphological grading.

Authors:  Itai Gat; Katelynn Tang; Kevin Quach; Valeriy Kuznyetsov; Ran Antes; Melissa Filice; Khaled Zohni; Clifford Librach
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-06-07       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Pulmonary exposure to carbonaceous nanomaterials and sperm quality.

Authors:  Astrid Skovmand; Anna Jacobsen Lauvås; Preben Christensen; Ulla Vogel; Karin Sørig Hougaard; Sandra Goericke-Pesch
Journal:  Part Fibre Toxicol       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 9.400

Review 7.  What should be done for men with sperm DNA fragmentation?

Authors:  Gi Young Kim
Journal:  Clin Exp Reprod Med       Date:  2018-09-03
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.