Literature DB >> 15866580

Effects of competition among fertility centers on pregnancy and high-order multiple gestation rates.

Anne Z Steiner1, Richard J Paulson, Katherine E Hartmann.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To measure the effect of competition among fertility centers on pregnancy and high-order multiple (HOM) gestation rates after IVF.
DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study.
SETTING: Four hundred eight fertility clinics registered with the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology as providing IVF services in 2000. Competition was defined as number of clinics in a geographically defined area. Demand for services was based on the population of reproductive-aged women. PATIENT(S): Three hundred eighty-one fertility clinics reporting clinical outcomes. INTERVENTION(S): Pregnancy rates, HOM gestation rates, population of reproductive-aged women, and number of competing clinics were calculated for each clinic from Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology and census data. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): The clinic HOM gestation rate (percentage of pregnancies that were HOM) and age-adjusted pregnancy rate. RESULT(S): The number of clinics in an area of competition ranged from 1 to 22. The HOM gestation rate per clinic ranged from 0% to 50%. As demand increased, competition increased. As competition increased, the number of HOM pregnancies per clinic decreased. In areas of low competition (1 to 2 clinics) the clinic HOM gestation rate was 8.43%, in areas of intermediate competition (3-7 clinics) 8.39%, and in areas of high competition (8-22 clinics) 8.24%. In areas with intermediate demand, high levels of competition resulted in fewer HOM pregnancies than intermediate competition (relative risk 0.56, 95% confidence interval 0.36-0.89) or low levels of competition (RR 0.57, 95% confidence interval 0.35-0.94). Age-adjusted pregnancy rates did not differ by level of competition. CONCLUSION(S): According to these data, the risk of HOM gestation decreases with increasing competition among clinics; however, pregnancy rates are unaffected.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15866580     DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2004.10.048

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  3 in total

1.  Competition, insurance mandates, and clinical practices and outcomes at in vitro fertilization clinics.

Authors:  Brianna Funderburk; Alaina Kelley; Sara Crawford
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2022-07-01       Impact factor: 3.357

2.  Joint modeling of success and treatment discontinuation in in vitro fertilization programs: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Pénélope Troude; Sophie Ancelet; Juliette Guibert; Jean-Luc Pouly; Jean Bouyer; Elise de La Rochebrochard
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2012-08-03       Impact factor: 3.007

3.  Deciding how many embryos to transfer: ongoing challenges and dilemmas.

Authors:  Robert Klitzman
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Soc Online       Date:  2016-07-25
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.