Literature DB >> 15866402

Modified cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) instruction protocols for emergency medical dispatchers: rationale and recommendations.

Lynn P Roppolo1, Paul E Pepe, Nicole Cimon, Marc Gay, Brett Patterson, Arthur Yancey, Jeff J Clawson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: International consensus guidelines now support the use of "chest compressions-only" cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) instructions (CCOIs) by emergency medical dispatch (EMD) personnel providing telephone assistance to untrained bystanders at a cardiac arrest scene. These guidelines are based largely on evolving experimental data and a clinical trial conducted in one venue with distinct emergency medical services (EMS) system features. Accordingly, the Council of Standards for the National Academies of Emergency Dispatch was asked to adapt a modified telephone CPR protocol, and specifically one that could be applied more broadly to the spectrum of EMS systems.
METHODS: A group of international EMD specialists, researchers and professional association representatives analyzed available scientific data and considered variations in EMS systems, particularly those in Europe and North America. RESULTS AND
CONCLUSIONS: Several recommendations were established: (1) to avoid confusion, bystanders already providing CPR should continue those previously learned methods; (2) following a sudden collapse unlikely to be of respiratory etiology, CCOIs should be provided when the bystander is not CPR-trained, declining to perform mouth-to-mouth ventilation or unsure of actions to take; (3) following 4 min of CCOIs, ventilations can be provided, but, for now, only at a compression-ventilation ratio of 100:2 until EMS arrives; (4) until more data become available, dispatchers should follow existing compression-ventilation protocols for children and adult cases involving probable respiratory/trauma etiologies; (5) EMD CPR protocols should account for EMS system features and receive quality oversight and expert medical direction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15866402     DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2004.11.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Resuscitation        ISSN: 0300-9572            Impact factor:   5.262


  7 in total

1.  Video calls from lay bystanders to dispatch centers - risk assessment of information security.

Authors:  Stein R Bolle; Per Hasvold; Eva Henriksen
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2011-09-30       Impact factor: 2.655

2.  What is more important: defibrillation or compression?

Authors:  Wei Gu; Chun-Sheng Li
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 2.895

3.  Favourable outcome after 26 minutes of "Compression only" resuscitation: a case report.

Authors:  Jon Erik Steen-Hansen
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2010-04-16       Impact factor: 2.953

4.  A randomized cross-over study of the quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation among females performing 30:2 and hands-only cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

Authors:  Cynthia Trowbridge; Jesal N Parekh; Mark D Ricard; Jerald Potts; W Clive Patrickson; Carolyn L Cason
Journal:  BMC Nurs       Date:  2009-07-07

5.  Can video mobile phones improve CPR quality when used for dispatcher assistance during simulated cardiac arrest?

Authors:  S R Bolle; J Scholl; M Gilbert
Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand       Date:  2008-10-22       Impact factor: 2.105

Review 6.  Key advances in critical care in the out-of-hospital setting: the evolving role of laypersons and technology.

Authors:  Paul E Pepe; Jane G Wigginton
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 9.097

7.  Knowledge and attitudes towards cardiopulmonary resuscitation and defibrillation amongst Asian primary health care physicians.

Authors:  Marcus Eh Ong; Susan Yap; Kim P Chan; Papia Sultana; Venkataraman Anantharaman
Journal:  Open Access Emerg Med       Date:  2009-11-16
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.