Literature DB >> 15865615

The effects of intervention with local electrostatic air cleaners on airborne dust and the health of office employees.

K R Skulberg1, K Skyberg, K Kruse, W Eduard, F Levy, J Kongerud, P Djupesland.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: The aim of this intervention study was to identify any health improvements in the upper and lower airways of office workers after the installation of local electrostatic air cleaners. Eighty persons with airways symptoms were recruited and randomly assigned to an intervention or control group. Half of the air cleaners had a non-functioning electrostatic unit. Both participants and field researchers were blinded to the group status. Subjective symptoms were recorded using a questionnaire, and indexes calculated for general, irritation and skin symptoms. Objective respiratory health indicators were recorded, with acoustic rhinometry and peak expiratory flow (PEF) meters. In the intervention group there was a decrease in mean dust concentration from 65 to 35 microg/m(3), and a reduction from 57 to 47 microg/m(3) in the control group (P < 0.05 for difference in decline). The reduction was observed for all particles sizes. The irritation and general symptom indices decreased in both groups, but there was no improvement in the intervention group, compared with the control group. Median PEF increased 3 ml/s in the intervention group, and decreased 4 ml/s in the control group. The adjusted odds ratio for an increase above the 70th percentile was 5.7 (95% CI 1.0-32). PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: Electrostatic air cleaners can reduce the dust concentration effectively in the office environment. Small, medium and large sized particles can be reduced by approximately 50%, relatively most effectively for the respirable particles. However, the air cleaners tested in this study produced an annoying fan noise. Cleaning efficiency and noise data should be given consideration before installation. This experimental field study suggests that office workers with airways symptoms may benefit from installation of local electrostatic air cleaners.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15865615     DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0668.2005.00331.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indoor Air        ISSN: 0905-6947            Impact factor:   5.770


  6 in total

Review 1.  Air pollution and chronic airway diseases: what should people know and do?

Authors:  Xu-Qin Jiang; Xiao-Dong Mei; Di Feng
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 2.895

2.  Combined use of an electrostatic precipitator and a high-efficiency particulate air filter in building ventilation systems: Effects on cardiorespiratory health indicators in healthy adults.

Authors:  D B Day; J Xiang; J Mo; M A Clyde; C J Weschler; F Li; J Gong; M Chung; Y Zhang; J Zhang
Journal:  Indoor Air       Date:  2018-01-24       Impact factor: 5.770

Review 3.  House dust mite avoidance measures for perennial allergic rhinitis.

Authors:  Aziz Sheikh; Brian Hurwitz; Ulugbek Nurmatov; Constant Paul van Schayck
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2010-07-07

4.  Effects of the Use of Air Purifier on Indoor Environment and Respiratory System among Healthy Adults.

Authors:  Yoshiko Yoda; Kenji Tamura; Sho Adachi; Naruhito Otani; Shoji F Nakayama; Masayuki Shima
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-05-23       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  Open-hardware design and characterization of an electrostatic aerosol precipitator.

Authors:  Sabin Kasparoglu; Timothy P Wright; Markus D Petters
Journal:  HardwareX       Date:  2022-01-10

6.  The Assessment of Indoor Formaldehyde and Bioaerosol Removal by Using Negative Discharge Electrostatic Air Cleaners.

Authors:  Chao-Yun Liu; Chao-Heng Tseng; Kai-Feng Wang
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-06-12       Impact factor: 4.614

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.