Literature DB >> 15865520

What happens to hemostatic agents in contact with urine? An in vitro study.

Carlos A Uribe1, Louis Eichel, Sepehr Khonsari, David S Finley, Jay Basillote, Hyung Keun Park, Ching Chia Li, Corollos Abdelshehid, David I Lee, Elspeth M McDougall, Ralph V Clayman.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: As the indications for topical hemostatic agents increase in urology, the question arises: what happens to these agents when they enter the urinary collecting system? To answer this question, we performed a series of in-vitro experiments mixing three hemostatic agents with normal and sanguineous urine.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four commercially available topical hemostatic products: oxidized regenerated cellulose (Surgicel; Ethicon, Somerville, NJ), fibrin sealant (Tisseel VH Kit; Baxter Health Care Corporation, Irvine, CA), gelatin matrix hemostatic sealant (FloSeal; Baxter Health Care), and polyethylene glycol (CoSeal; Cohesion Technologies, Palo Alto, CA) were studied. Human urine (10 mL) was added to samples of each substance; this was done in triplicate. The 12 sample tubes were then capped and placed on a tube shaker at slow speed and 37 degrees C. Observations regarding consistency of the material were made at 6, 12, 24, 48, 72, 96, and 120 hours (5 days). Gelatin matrix hemostatic sealant was further tested in urine with various amounts of blood or blood clot; observations were again recorded out to 5 days.
RESULTS: Surgicel maintained its solid form when it initially came in contact with urine, but over a period of 5 days, it transformed into a mucoid substance with visible free-floating fibers. It did not dissolve completely in urine within 5 days. Gelatin matrix was immediately transformed by urine into a fine colloidal suspension that did not change over the 5 days of the study. Fibrin glue, after mixing of the two components (fibrinogen and thrombin) directly in the urine, and polyethylene glycol immediately formed a solid clot at the bottom of the test tube on contact with the urine. When the mixture of fibrin sealant was allowed to form for 15 minutes and then added to urine, it again maintained a solid form. After 72 hours, the fibrin glue became a semisolid gelatinous plug. On analysis at 5 days, the fibrin sealant clot had transformed into a cohesive mucoid gel, and the polyethylene glycol clot had not changed. The gelatin matrix hemostatic sealant, when in contact with blood or blood clot, appeared to either become part of a clot or to remain in a colloidal suspension. At 5 days, all clots had dissolved to fine particulate suspensions, and the gelatin matrix appeared as a fine suspension.
CONCLUSION: Fibrin glue and oxidized regenerated cellulose maintain a solid form when initially placed in direct contact with urine and then assume a semisolid gelatinous state, which is still present at 5 days. Polyethylene glycol forms a solid clot initially and does not change after 5 days. Only hemostatic gelatin matrix remained as a fine particulate suspension in both normal and sanguineous urine. The implications of these findings with regard to sealing the renal parenchyma or small violations of the collecting system after percutaneous or laparoscopic surgery await in-vivo testing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15865520     DOI: 10.1089/end.2005.19.312

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endourol        ISSN: 0892-7790            Impact factor:   2.942


  17 in total

Review 1.  A review of methods for hemostasis and renorrhaphy after laparoscopic and robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy.

Authors:  Rajan Ramanathan; Raymond J Leveillee
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  Advances in endourology: highlights from the 21st world congress on endourology and shockwave lithotripsy/19th basic research symposium, september 21-24, 2003, montreal, Canada.

Authors:  Dean G Assimos
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2004

Review 3.  [Technical innovations in endourological stone therapy].

Authors:  P Honeck; U Nagele; M S Michel
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 4.  The management of the access tract after percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  Tanja Hüsch; Michael Reiter; René Mager; Eva Steiner; Thomas R W Herrmann; Axel Haferkamp; David Schilling
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-04-23       Impact factor: 4.226

5.  Tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy with non-absorbable hemostatic sealant (Quikclot®) versus nephrostomy tube placement: a propensity score-matched analysis.

Authors:  Kyo Chul Koo; Sang Un Park; Ho Sung Jang; Chang-Hee Hong
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2015-06-30       Impact factor: 3.436

6.  Comparison of outcomes in totally tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy according to nephrostomy tract sealing with fibrin versus gelatin matrix: a propensity score matching study.

Authors:  Jung Jun Kim; Yoon Seok Suh; Deok Hyun Han
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2019-03-14       Impact factor: 3.436

Review 7.  Hemostatic agents used for nephrostomy tract closure after tubeless PCNL: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Cui Yu; Zhou Xu; Wang Long; Liu Longfei; Zeng Feng; Qi Lin; Zu Xiongbing; Chen Hequn
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2014-07-27       Impact factor: 3.436

8.  The use of adjunctive hemostatic agents in tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jiawu Wang; Chengyao Zhang; Guangzhong Tan; Bo Yang; Wenkai Chen; Dan Tan
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2014-09-09       Impact factor: 3.436

9.  Haemostatics in surgery and our experience in the enucleoresection of renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Gianna Pace; Pietro Saldutto; Carlo Vicentini; Lucio Miano
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2010-05-12       Impact factor: 2.754

10.  Tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  Madhu Sudan Agrawal; Mayank Agrawal
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2010 Jan-Mar
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.