Literature DB >> 15864564

Human whole-body reaching in normal gravity and microgravity reveals a strong temporal coordination between postural and focal task components.

Jerome Patron1, Paul Stapley, Thierry Pozzo.   

Abstract

Previous experiments by our group in normal gravity (1 G) have revealed spatial relationships between postural and focal components of whole-body reaching and pointing movements. We suggested that these relationships could be explained partly through the use of gravity to displace the CoM and attain the object or target position. In this study we compared human whole-body reaching in 1 G and microgravity (0 G) in order to more fully investigate how gravity contributes to strategies adopted for task execution and to determine possible invariant temporal relationships between multiple segments. Whole-body reaching movements made from the standing position in two experimental conditions of execution speed (naturally paced and as fast as possible) were recorded during periods of 1 G and 0 G in parabolic flight. Overall, at each speed of reaching, movement times were significantly slower when performed in 0 G than in 1 G for two of the three subjects, but all subjects were able to produce significantly faster movements in 0 G than in 1 G. Despite similar general trends across subjects observed in 1 G, angular displacements of reaching movements performed in 0 G differed greatly between subjects. There were changes at all joints, but above all at the shoulder and the ankle. However, despite a high intersubject and intratrial variability in 0 G, in both gravity conditions all subjects demonstrated times to peak curvilinear velocity for the finger (end effector) and the whole-body centre of mass (CoM) that coincided, regardless of the speed of execution. Moreover, cross-correlations between multiple segment curvilinear velocities and those of the CoM revealed tight, highly correlated temporal relationships between segments proximal to the CoM (which was expected). However, for more distal segments, the correlations were weaker, and the movements lagged behind movements of the CoM. The major and most interesting finding of this study was that although the finger was the most distal within the segment chain, with respect to the CoM, it was highly correlated with the CoM (0.99--0.98, all conditions) and with no time lag. Despite the large intersubject and inter-environmental variability recorded in this study, temporal relationships between postural task components (CoM displacements) and those of the focal movement (end-effector trajectory) were consistently conserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15864564     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-005-2283-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  33 in total

Review 1.  Internal models for motor control and trajectory planning.

Authors:  M Kawato
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 6.627

2.  Investigating centre of mass stabilisation as the goal of posture and movement coordination during human whole body reaching.

Authors:  P Stapley; T Pozzo; A Grishin; C Papaxanthis
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.086

3.  Multiple paired forward and inverse models for motor control.

Authors:  D M Wolpert; M Kawato
Journal:  Neural Netw       Date:  1998-10

4.  Strategies for the integration of posture and movement during reaching in the cat.

Authors:  Benedicte Schepens; Trevor Drew
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-08-06       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  A statistical approach to sensorimotor strategies: conjugate cross-correlations.

Authors:  B Amblard; C Assaiante; H Lekhel; A R Marchand
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 1.328

6.  The role of anticipatory postural adjustments during whole body forward reaching movements.

Authors:  P Stapley; T Pozzo; A Grishin
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  1998-02-16       Impact factor: 1.837

7.  Is the erect posture in microgravity based on the control of trunk orientation or center of mass position?

Authors:  J Massion; K Popov; J C Fabre; P Rage; V Gurfinkel
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Coordination of mono- and bi-articular muscles in multi-degree of freedom elbow movements.

Authors:  L E Sergio; D J Ostry
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Early emergence of temporal co-ordination of lower limb segments elevation angles in human locomotion.

Authors:  G Cheron; A Bengoetxea; E Bouillot; F Lacquaniti; B Dan
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2001-08-03       Impact factor: 3.046

10.  Forward and backward axial synergies in man.

Authors:  P Crenna; C Frigo; J Massion; A Pedotti
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 1.972

View more
  10 in total

1.  Reaching while standing in microgravity: a new postural solution to oversimplify movement control.

Authors:  Claudia Casellato; Michele Tagliabue; Alessandra Pedrocchi; Charalambos Papaxanthis; Giancarlo Ferrigno; Thierry Pozzo
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-12-08       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Whole body lexical decision.

Authors:  Miguel A Moreno; Nigel Stepp; M T Turvey
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2010-12-22       Impact factor: 3.046

3.  Coordination between postural and movement controls: effect of changes in body mass distribution on postural and focal component characteristics.

Authors:  Gilles Robert; Jean Blouin; Hélène Ruget; Laurence Mouchnino
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-03-13       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Kinematic adaptation of locomotor pattern in rheumatoid arthritis patients with forefoot impairment.

Authors:  Davy Laroche; Paul Ornetti; Elizabeth Thomas; Yves Ballay; Jean Francis Maillefert; Thierry Pozzo
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-08-17       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Development of the coordination between posture and manual control.

Authors:  Jeffrey M Haddad; Laura J Claxton; Rachel Keen; Neil E Berthier; Gary E Riccio; Joseph Hamill; Richard E A Van Emmerik
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  2011-10-02

6.  Whole body adaptation to novel dynamics does not transfer between effectors.

Authors:  Alison Pienciak-Siewert; Alaa A Ahmed
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2021-08-25       Impact factor: 2.974

7.  Effects of Parkinson's disease on proprioceptive control of posture and reaching while standing.

Authors:  M Tagliabue; G Ferrigno; F Horak
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2008-12-14       Impact factor: 3.590

8.  Transfer of dynamic learning across postures.

Authors:  Alaa A Ahmed; Daniel M Wolpert
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-08-26       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Human motor adaptation in whole body motion.

Authors:  Jan Babič; Erhan Oztop; Mitsuo Kawato
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-09-09       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Sensorimotor Reorganizations of Arm Kinematics and Postural Strategy for Functional Whole-Body Reaching Movements in Microgravity.

Authors:  Thomas Macaluso; Christophe Bourdin; Frank Buloup; Marie-Laure Mille; Patrick Sainton; Fabrice R Sarlegna; Jean-Louis Vercher; Lionel Bringoux
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2017-10-20       Impact factor: 4.566

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.