Literature DB >> 15864440

Experimental manipulation of sexual selection and the evolution of courtship song in Drosophila pseudoobscura.

R R Snook1, A Robertson, H S Crudgington, M G Ritchie.   

Abstract

Courtship song serves as a sexual signal and may contribute to reproductive isolation between closely related species. Using lines of Drosophila pseudoobscura experimentally selected under different sexual selection regimes, we tested whether increased promiscuity and enforced monogamy led to evolutionary changes in courtship song elements. In D. pseudoobscura, males produce both a low and high rate repetition song. We found that both song types diverged after selection and that the direction of changes was consistent with ordered hypotheses of predicted directions of change under the different mating system structures. In particular, latency to the initiation of song and duration of the interpulse interval (IPI) decreased in highly promiscuous lines and increased in monogamous lines. These results suggest that courtship song may rapidly evolve under different mating system structures, representing either functional evolution of more stimulatory song under conditions of strong sexual selection, or might result from increased courtship vigor, or represent correlated evolution. Some speciation theory predicts that increased sexual selection should result in increased variance of traits between allopatric populations, facilitating reproductive isolation. We also found that courtship song elements were not equally variable between replicate lines.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15864440     DOI: 10.1007/s10519-005-3217-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Genet        ISSN: 0001-8244            Impact factor:   2.805


  14 in total

1.  Ecological gradient of sexual selection: elevation and song elaboration in finches.

Authors:  Emilie C Snell-Rood; Alexander V Badyaev
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2008-07-08       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  No accelerated rate of protein evolution in male-biased Drosophila pseudoobscura genes.

Authors:  Muralidhar Metta; Rambabu Gudavalli; Jean-Michel Gibert; Christian Schlötterer
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-07-02       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 3.  Mosquito Sexual Selection and Reproductive Control Programs.

Authors:  Lauren J Cator; Claudia A S Wyer; Laura C Harrington
Journal:  Trends Parasitol       Date:  2021-01-07

4.  Sexual selection on song and cuticular hydrocarbons in two distinct populations of Drosophila montana.

Authors:  Paris Veltsos; Claude Wicker-Thomas; Roger K Butlin; Anneli Hoikkala; Michael G Ritchie
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 2.912

5.  Evolution of mating behavior between two populations adapting to common environmental conditions.

Authors:  Margarida Bárbaro; Mário S Mira; Inês Fragata; Pedro Simões; Margarida Lima; Miguel Lopes-Cunha; Bárbara Kellen; Josiane Santos; Susana A M Varela; Margarida Matos; Sara Magalhães
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2015-03-18       Impact factor: 2.912

6.  Mating system variation drives rapid evolution of the female transcriptome in Drosophila pseudoobscura.

Authors:  Elina Immonen; Rhonda R Snook; Michael G Ritchie
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2014-05-06       Impact factor: 2.912

7.  Experimental evolution of a sexually selected display in yeast.

Authors:  David W Rogers; Duncan Greig
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-02-07       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Evolution of sexual dimorphism of wing shape in the Drosophila melanogaster subgroup.

Authors:  Nelly A Gidaszewski; Michel Baylac; Christian Peter Klingenberg
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2009-05-20       Impact factor: 3.260

9.  Evolution of divergent female mating preference in response to experimental sexual selection.

Authors:  Allan Debelle; Michael G Ritchie; Rhonda R Snook
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2014-07-21       Impact factor: 3.694

10.  Experimental evolution under hyper-promiscuity in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Jennifer C Perry; Richa Joag; David J Hosken; Nina Wedell; Jacek Radwan; Stuart Wigby
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2016-06-16       Impact factor: 3.260

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.