Literature DB >> 15864207

Secondary implantation of an artificial sphincter after abdominoperineal resection and pseudocontinent perineal colostomy for rectal cancer.

Frédéric Marchal1, Carole Doucet, David Lechaux, Philippe Lasser, Paul-Antoine Lehur.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Fecal continence with a perineal colostomy performed after abdominoperineal resection (APR) is not always satisfactory despite retrograde colonic enemas. Functional improvement is currently examined using artificial sphincters. Preliminary results are disclosed. PATIENTS: In 3 female patients, 45, 59 and 68 years old, curative APR and perineal colostomy were performed after radiotherapy in 2, for T1-2N0 cancer of the lower rectum. Due to occasional leaks, need for strict diet and fear of incontinence, an Acticon Neosphincter (AMS) was implanted consecutively at a mean 4.5 years after APR.
RESULTS: Device implantation was feasible and uneventful. In one case, a superficial hematoma was drained and healed by second intention. Devices were activated 3 months after implantation. At a mean 2.5 years follow-up, the 3 patients had an activated and functional artificial sphincter. Leaks and fecal urgency significantly decreased but colonic enemas were maintained. Dietary restrictions were less and quality of life improved. All 3 considered the device as a useful adjunct.
CONCLUSION: In this limited experience, implantation of artificial sphincter around a perineal colostomy following APR for rectal cancer appeared feasible and safe even in case of previous radiotherapy. Mid-term tolerance was satisfactory. Continence and quality of life significantly improved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15864207     DOI: 10.1016/s0399-8320(05)80797-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastroenterol Clin Biol        ISSN: 0399-8320


  4 in total

Review 1.  [Dynamic graciloplasty vs artificial bowel sphincter in the management of severe fecal incontinence].

Authors:  O Ruthmann; A Fischer; U T Hopt; H J Schrag
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 2.  Current aspects and future prospects of total anorectal reconstruction--a critical and comprehensive review of the literature.

Authors:  Roman A Inglin; Daniel Eberli; Lukas E Brügger; Tullio Sulser; Norman S Williams; Daniel Candinas
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2014-11-19       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Use of the gluteus maximus muscle as the neosphincter for restoration of anal function after abdominoperineal resection.

Authors:  J D Puerta Díaz; R Castaño Llano; L J Lombana; J I Restrepo; G Gómez
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2012-12-15       Impact factor: 3.781

Review 4.  Sphincter-sparing surgery in patients with low-lying rectal cancer: techniques, oncologic outcomes, and functional results.

Authors:  Liliana Bordeianou; Lillias Holmes Maguire; Karim Alavi; Ranjan Sudan; Paul E Wise; Andreas M Kaiser
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2014-05-13       Impact factor: 3.452

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.