STUDY DESIGN: Experimental histologic study of the effects of radiofrequency (RF) or convective heating of the rat dorsal root ganglion or sciatic nerve to 42 degrees C. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether treatment causes neuropathologic changes in an effort to explore the mechanisms and safety of pulsed RF pain therapy. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Clinical data suggest that low temperature pulsed RF energy delivered to the DRG is a safe and effective form of therapy for low back pain. However, the mechanism by which this treatment modifies pain is unclear. METHODS: A total of 118 Sprague-Dawley rats were divided into five groups for different RF and thermal treatments. All treatments increased tissue temperature to 42 degrees C. Treatments of the DRG included pulsed RF, continuous RF, and conductive heat. The generator output was increased until 42 degrees C was obtained in the tissue and was then maintained for 120 seconds. As a positive control, some rat sciatic nerves were treated with continuous RF lesions at 80 degrees C. Animals were killed for histologic study at 2, 7, or 21 days after treatment. Tissue was fixed in gluteraldehyde and embedded in plastic resin for detailed light microscopic neuropathologic evaluation. RESULTS: The methods used to heat the tissue to 42 degrees C caused no significant difference in pathology. However, subclinical changes included endoneurial edema caused by alterations in the function of the blood-nerve barrier, fibroblast activation, and collagen deposition. Tissue returned to normal conditions by 7 days in nerve and 21 days in the DRG. These minor structural changes observed at the light microscopic level in normal animals do not exclude the possibility that there would be nonstructural changes in gene expression or cytokine upregulation in injured tissue. Lesions at 80 degrees C caused consistent thermal injury characterized by Wallerian degeneration of nerve fibers. CONCLUSIONS: The data support the hypothesis that pulsed RF treatment does not rely on thermal injury of neurologic tissue to achieve its effect.
STUDY DESIGN: Experimental histologic study of the effects of radiofrequency (RF) or convective heating of the rat dorsal root ganglion or sciatic nerve to 42 degrees C. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether treatment causes neuropathologic changes in an effort to explore the mechanisms and safety of pulsed RF pain therapy. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Clinical data suggest that low temperature pulsed RF energy delivered to the DRG is a safe and effective form of therapy for low back pain. However, the mechanism by which this treatment modifies pain is unclear. METHODS: A total of 118 Sprague-Dawley rats were divided into five groups for different RF and thermal treatments. All treatments increased tissue temperature to 42 degrees C. Treatments of the DRG included pulsed RF, continuous RF, and conductive heat. The generator output was increased until 42 degrees C was obtained in the tissue and was then maintained for 120 seconds. As a positive control, some rat sciatic nerves were treated with continuous RF lesions at 80 degrees C. Animals were killed for histologic study at 2, 7, or 21 days after treatment. Tissue was fixed in gluteraldehyde and embedded in plastic resin for detailed light microscopic neuropathologic evaluation. RESULTS: The methods used to heat the tissue to 42 degrees C caused no significant difference in pathology. However, subclinical changes included endoneurial edema caused by alterations in the function of the blood-nerve barrier, fibroblast activation, and collagen deposition. Tissue returned to normal conditions by 7 days in nerve and 21 days in the DRG. These minor structural changes observed at the light microscopic level in normal animals do not exclude the possibility that there would be nonstructural changes in gene expression or cytokine upregulation in injured tissue. Lesions at 80 degrees C caused consistent thermal injury characterized by Wallerian degeneration of nerve fibers. CONCLUSIONS: The data support the hypothesis that pulsed RF treatment does not rely on thermal injury of neurologic tissue to achieve its effect.
Authors: Steven P Cohen; Arun Bhaskar; Anuj Bhatia; Asokumar Buvanendran; Tim Deer; Shuchita Garg; W Michael Hooten; Robert W Hurley; David J Kennedy; Brian C McLean; Jee Youn Moon; Samer Narouze; Sanjog Pangarkar; David Anthony Provenzano; Richard Rauck; B Todd Sitzman; Matthew Smuck; Jan van Zundert; Kevin Vorenkamp; Mark S Wallace; Zirong Zhao Journal: Reg Anesth Pain Med Date: 2020-04-03 Impact factor: 6.288