Literature DB >> 15862492

Common channel length predicts outcomes of biliopancreatic diversion alone and with the duodenal switch surgery.

Donald B McConnell1, Robert W O'rourke, Clifford W Deveney.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The optimal common channel (CC) length for malabsorptive weight loss surgeries is unknown even though these surgeries were developed in the 1970s (biliopancreatic diversion [BPD]) and the 1990s (biliopancreatic diversion with a duodenal switch [BPD DS]). We hypothesized that the length of the CC correlates with a successful weight loss result.
METHODS: We evaluated 3 groups of patients based on the length of the CC whose duration of follow-up evaluation was at least 1 year. We reviewed all patients who had either an open BPD (5 patients) or a BPD DS (119 patients) from August 1998 to October 2003, for which D.B.M. was the participating surgeon.
RESULTS: Group I comprised 15 patients: their preoperative body mass index (BMI) was 53.9 kg/m(2); 73.3% of patients had a BMI more than 50, and the CC length was 150 cm. Group II comprised 76 patients: their preoperative BMI was 54.25 kg/m(2); 73.3% of patients had a BMI more than 50, and the CC length was 100 cm. Group III comprised 33 patients: their preoperative BMI was 60.1 kg/m(2); 84% of patients had a BMI more than 50, and the CC length was 80 to 90 cm. The mean weight loss in group I was 45 kg (44% mean excess weight loss). The mean weight loss in groups II and III was 55.8 and 61.5 kg, respectively (a 57% and 54.8% mean excess weight loss, respectively) (all P < .05 by analysis of variance). A weight loss of greater than 50% of excess body weight occurred in 40% of patients in group I versus 63% of patients in groups II and III combined (P < .01 by chi(2)).
CONCLUSIONS: The length of the CC contributes significantly to successful excess weight loss in BPD and BPD DS patients. In general, the length of the CC should not exceed 100 cm.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15862492     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2005.01.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg        ISSN: 0002-9610            Impact factor:   2.565


  14 in total

1.  Obesity surgery results depending on technique performed: long-term outcome.

Authors:  J A Gracia; M Martínez; M Elia; V Aguilella; P Royo; A Jiménez; M A Bielsa; D Arribas
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2008-11-12       Impact factor: 4.129

2.  SAGES guideline for clinical application of laparoscopic bariatric surgery.

Authors: 
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  Mechanisms of Action of Surgical Interventions on Weight-Related Diseases: the Potential Role of Bile Acids.

Authors:  Mohsen Mazidi; Pedro Paulo P de Caravatto; John R Speakman; Ricardo V Cohen
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 4.129

4.  One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass-Mini Gastric Bypass with Tailored Biliopancreatic Limb Length Formula Relative to Small Bowel Length: Preliminary Results.

Authors:  Iman Komaei; Federica Sarra; Claudio Lazzara; Michele Ammendola; Riccardo Memeo; Giuseppe Sammarco; Giuseppe Navarra; Giuseppe Currò
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 4.129

Review 5.  The importance of the length of the limbs for gastric bypass patients--an evidence-based review.

Authors:  Dimitrios Stefanidis; Timothy S Kuwada; Keith S Gersin
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 4.129

6.  MGB-OAGB: Effect of Biliopancreatic Limb Length on Nutritional Deficiency, Weight Loss, and Comorbidity Resolution.

Authors:  Anmol Ahuja; Om Tantia; Ghanshyam Goyal; Tamonas Chaudhuri; Shashi Khanna; Anshuman Poddar; Sonam Gupta; Kajari Majumdar
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 4.129

Review 7.  Successful weight loss surgery improves eating control and energy metabolism: a review of the evidence.

Authors:  Dave H Schweitzer; Emile F Dubois; Niki van den Doel-Tanis; Hok I Oei
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 4.129

8.  A clinical and nutritional comparison of biliopancreatic diversion performed with different common and alimentary channel lengths.

Authors:  Giuseppe Currò; Tommaso Centorrino; Andrea Cogliandolo; Arturo Dattola; Grazia Pagano; Alberto Barbera; Giuseppe Navarra
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 4.129

9.  Postoperative morbidity of biliopancreatic diversion depending on common limb length.

Authors:  Jose-Antonio Gracia; Mariano Martinez; Vicente Aguilella; Manuela Elia; Pablo Royo
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 4.129

Review 10.  Clinical application of laparoscopic bariatric surgery: an evidence-based review.

Authors:  Timothy M Farrell; Stephen P Haggerty; D Wayne Overby; Geoffrey P Kohn; William S Richardson; Robert D Fanelli
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-01-06       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.