Literature DB >> 15862086

The irrationality of the present use of the osmole gap: applicable physical chemistry principles and recommendations to improve the validity of current practices.

Yoshikata Koga1, Roy A Purssell, Larry D Lynd.   

Abstract

The present clinical use of serum osmometry is erroneous in two respects. The first, and the most important, is the incorrect assumption that serum behaves as a dilute 'ideal' solution and that the osmotic activity of a substance depends solely on the number of solute particles. The amount of variance from ideal behaviour of serum containing an exogenous substance is expressed by the osmotic coefficient (phi). We have calculated the osmotic coefficient for serum containing ethanol (alcohol) and recommend that the osmotic coefficient for serum containing other low molecular weight substances such as methanol (methyl alcohol), isopropyl alcohol and ethylene glycol also be calculated. This is necessary for the accurate calculation of the contribution of these substances to the serum osmolality.Secondly, the practice of subtracting the calculated serum molarity from measured serum osmolality is not valid since it represents a mathematically improper expression. The units of these two terms are different. The 'osmole gap' (OG) is typically viewed as the difference between serum osmolality determined by an osmometer and the estimated total molarity of solute in serum by directly measuring the concentration of several substances and then substituting them into a published formula. Some authors call this sum the calculated or estimated osmolarity but, because the concentrations are measured directly and not with an osmometer, the calculated term represents molarity. The units of osmolality are mmol/kg of H2O and the units of molarity are mmol/L. Therefore, the practice of subtracting calculated serum molarity from measured serum osmolality is not mathematically sound and is an oversimplification for ease of application. This mathematical transgression necessarily adds an error to the incorrectly calculated OG. Despite this, the OG is commonly used in clinical medicine. Serum osmolality can be converted to molarity provided the weight percentage and the density of the solution are known and thus, we recommend that this conversion be done prior to calculation of the gap. We recommend that the gap between measured serum osmolarity and calculated serum molarity be called the 'osmolar gap'. After having corrected for non-ideality for serum and for inconsistency of units, the standard value and reference range for this gap must be determined in an adequate number of patient populations and in a variety of clinical settings. An example of this determination, using data from a group of ethanol-poisoned patients is given. This correction should be applied before the evaluation of the osmolar gap as a screening test for other low molecular weight substances proceeds.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15862086     DOI: 10.2165/00139709-200423030-00006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Toxicol Rev        ISSN: 1176-2551


  10 in total

1.  Evaluation of 36 formulas for calculating plasma osmolality.

Authors:  Andreas S Fazekas; Georg-Christian Funk; Daniela S Klobassa; Horst Rüther; Ingrid Ziegler; Rolf Zander; Hans-Jürgen Semmelrock
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2012-10-19       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  A comparison of whole blood and plasma osmolality and osmolarity.

Authors:  Samuel N Cheuvront; Robert W Kenefick; Kristen R Heavens; Marissa G Spitz
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2014-03-19       Impact factor: 2.352

Review 3.  Harmonisation of Osmolal Gap - Can We Use a Common Formula?

Authors:  Kay Weng Choy; Nilika Wijeratne; Zhong X Lu; James Cg Doery
Journal:  Clin Biochem Rev       Date:  2016-08

4.  The 'gap' in the 'plasma osmolar gap'.

Authors:  Alok Arora
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2013-08-08

5.  A retrospective analysis of glycol and toxic alcohol ingestion: utility of anion and osmolal gaps.

Authors:  Matthew D Krasowski; Rebecca M Wilcoxon; Joel Miron
Journal:  BMC Clin Pathol       Date:  2012-01-12

6.  Prediction of neurologic deterioration based on support vector machine algorithms and serum osmolarity equations.

Authors:  Jixian Lin; Aihua Jiang; Meirong Ling; Yanqing Mo; Meiyi Li; Jing Zhao
Journal:  Brain Behav       Date:  2018-06-11       Impact factor: 2.708

7.  An evaluation of the osmole gap as a screening test for toxic alcohol poisoning.

Authors:  Larry D Lynd; Kathryn J Richardson; Roy A Purssell; Riyad B Abu-Laban; Jeffery R Brubacher; Katherine J Lepik; Marco L A Sivilotti
Journal:  BMC Emerg Med       Date:  2008-04-28

8.  Accuracy of prediction equations for serum osmolarity in frail older people with and without diabetes.

Authors:  Mario Siervo; Diane Bunn; Carla M Prado; Lee Hooper
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2014-07-16       Impact factor: 7.045

9.  Diagnostic accuracy of calculated serum osmolarity to predict dehydration in older people: adding value to pathology laboratory reports.

Authors:  Lee Hooper; Asmaa Abdelhamid; Adam Ali; Diane K Bunn; Amy Jennings; W Garry John; Susan Kerry; Gregor Lindner; Carmen A Pfortmueller; Fredrik Sjöstrand; Neil P Walsh; Susan J Fairweather-Tait; John F Potter; Paul R Hunter; Lee Shepstone
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2015-10-21       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  Correlation of osmolal gap with measured concentrations of acetone, ethylene glycol, isopropanol, methanol, and propylene glycol in patients at an academic medical center.

Authors:  Heather R Greene; Matthew D Krasowski
Journal:  Toxicol Rep       Date:  2019-12-23
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.