Literature DB >> 15861940

Comparison between three therapeutic modalities for non-complicated pilonidal sinus disease.

H A Mohamed1, I Kadry, S Adly.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the outcome of each of the three methods used to treat pilonidal sinus disease. STUDY
DESIGN: A prospective blind randomised study.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between April 2000 and February 2003, 83 patients (68 male and 15 female), aged between 19 and 31 years (mean 26.6), scheduled for elective operations for pilonidal sinus disease. Patients were randomly assigned to receive one of three excisional surgical procedures. Group A consisted of 28 patients (22 males and six females) and underwent wide resection of the skin and subcutaneous tissue of the natal cleft, followed by primary closure of the wound in two layers after insertion of suction drain. Group B consisted of 26 patients (22 males and four females) and underwent wide resection of the skin and subcutaneous tissue and their wounds left opened for secondary intention healing. Group C consisted of 29 patients (24 males and five females) and underwent limited excision of the fistulous tract and their wounds were left opened for secondary intention healing. Patients were followed-up for 15 to 48 months post-operatively. Demographic data, operative time, hospital stay, operative blood loss, post-operative pain, wound healing time and patient's satisfaction were recorded.
RESULTS: The limited excision group of patients had a highly significant shorter operative time than the closed wound group of patients (p<0.001). They also had the shortest hospital stay, operative blood loss and post-operative pain (p<0.001). The closed wound group of patients showed significantly shortest wound healing time, followed by the limited excision group of patients; the wide excision group of patients showed the longest healing time. Apart from the minimal non-significant elevation of the rate of recurrence in the closed wound group of patients, there was no difference between the three groups. All recurrent cases were obese patients and presented within the first six months after operations.
CONCLUSION: Limited excision of a pilonidal sinus represents one of the best therapeutic options. The result of this method is comparable with the more aggressive frequently used excisional method, and it has the advantage of having a shorter convalescence and better patient satisfaction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15861940     DOI: 10.1016/s1479-666x(05)80065-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surgeon        ISSN: 1479-666X            Impact factor:   2.392


  16 in total

1.  Effectiveness of a drain in surgical treatment of sacrococcygeal pilonidal disease. Results of a randomized and controlled clinical trial on 803 consecutive patients.

Authors:  Marco Milone; Milone Marco; Mario Musella; Musella Mario; Giuseppe Salvatore; Salvatore Giuseppe; Maddalena Leongito; Leongito Maddalena; Francesco Milone; Milone Francesco
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2011-05-15       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing different techniques with primary closure for chronic pilonidal sinus.

Authors:  J M Enriquez-Navascues; J I Emparanza; M Alkorta; C Placer
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2014-04-30       Impact factor: 3.781

Review 3.  German national guideline on the management of pilonidal disease.

Authors:  I Iesalnieks; A Ommer; S Petersen; D Doll; A Herold
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2016-06-16       Impact factor: 3.445

Review 4.  Minimally invasive techniques in the management of pilonidal disease.

Authors:  Ramya Kalaiselvan; Sonia Bathla; William Allen; Aloka Liyanage; Rajasundaram Rajaganeshan
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2019-02-27       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  "Flag Excision and Flap" Procedure: a Novel Modification for Off-Midline Closure After Pilonidal Sinus Excision.

Authors:  Ergun Yucel; Levent Tezcan; O Cem Yilmaz; Mehmet Levhi Akin
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2015-02-07       Impact factor: 0.656

6.  A pediatric surgeon's 35-year experience with pilonidal disease in a Canadian children's hospital.

Authors:  Ahmed Nasr; Sigmund H Ein
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 2.089

7.  Limberg flap for sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus a safe and sound procedure.

Authors:  Srikanth K Aithal; C S Rajan; Narender Reddy
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2012-05-06       Impact factor: 0.656

Review 8.  Healing by primary versus secondary intention after surgical treatment for pilonidal sinus.

Authors:  Ahmed Al-Khamis; Iain McCallum; Peter M King; Julie Bruce
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2010-01-20

9.  Conservative Sinusectomy vs. excision and primary off-midline closure for pilonidal disease: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Sotirios Georgios Popeskou; Barbara Pravini; Sofoklis Panteleimonitis; Antoniacopo Ferrario Di Tor Vajana; Alice Vanoni; Mike Schmalzbauer; Alberto Posabella; Dimitri Christoforidis
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2020-03-06       Impact factor: 2.571

10.  The EPIC procedure (Endoscopic-assisted Pilonidal Irrigation and Cleaning): a simple and effective treatment for pilonidal disease.

Authors:  Jacob Baxter; Jairo A Espinosa; Michael J Leinwand
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2021-03-15       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.