| Literature DB >> 15861225 |
Dwight E Lynn1, Stephen M Ferkovich.
Abstract
New cell lines from embryos of Ephestia kuehniella were recently developed. Primary cultures were initiated in September 2002 from 2 to 4 day old eggs in either modified TC-100 or ExCell 400 medium. From these initial cultures, one, originally isolated in the Ex-Cell medium, produced sufficient cell growth to allow subcultivation and eventually led to the establishment of two cell strains, one that forms multicellular vesicles in suspension and one consisting of tightly attached epithelial-like cells. The strains were compared to an extract from E. kuehniella eggs by isozyme analysis and shown to be from the same species. Both strains were inoculated with various insect viruses, including nucleopolyhedroviruses from Autographa californica, Anagrapha falcifera, Anticarsa gemmatalis, Galleria mellonella, Heliothis armigera, Helicoverpa zea, Lymantria dispar, Plutella xylostella, and Rachoplusia ou. Both strains were highly susceptible to most of the nucleopolyhedroviruses (with the exception of the viruses from Helicoverpa zea and Lymantria dispar which did not show cytopathology to either cell strain) with large numbers of occlusion bodies produced in most of the inoculated cells. Our results suggest these new lines can be useful in biocontrol research.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2004 PMID: 15861225 PMCID: PMC528869 DOI: 10.1093/jis/4.1.9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Insect Sci ISSN: 1536-2442 Impact factor: 1.857
Figure 1.Phase contrast micrographs of new Ephestia kuehniella cell lines atfive days post subcultivation. 1A. IPLB-Ekx4T; 1B. IPLB-Ek-x4V. Both figures are at the same magnification. Marker bar is 100 µm.
Figure 2.Electrophoresis patterns on gels stained for 2A. phosphoglucomutase, 2B phosphoglucose isomerase; 2C. isocitrate dehydrogenase; or 2D Malic enzyme. All materials were from the Authentikit® system. The — mark shows the location were the individual cell extracts (from the cell line indicated at the bottom of the figure) were applied to the gels and the arrow heads < indicate the location of some light bands that were seen on the gels but which may not be apparent in the photo. Samples were electrophoresed 25 min prior to staining for the indicated substrate.
Replication of nucleopolyhedroviruses in new cell lines from Ephestia kuehniella.
Figure 3.IPLB-Ek-x4T cells 6-days post inoculation with virus. 3A and 3B, A. californica NPV-infected cells; 3C and 3D, A. gemmatalis NPV-infected; 3E and 3F, H. zea SNPV-inoculated; 3G and 3H, L. dispar NPV-inoculated; and 3I and 3J, IPLB-Ek-x4V control cells at the same time. Figures 3A, 3C, 3E, 3G, 3I taken with phase contrast optics; 3B, 3D, 3F, 3H, and 3J all taken using Hoffman modulation contrast, which better reveals the occlusion bodies in the nuclei of infected cells. All micrographs are at the same magnification as indicated by the 50µm marker bar in figure 3J.