Literature DB >> 15861212

Reliability of chromogenic in situ hybridization for detecting HER-2 gene status in breast cancer: comparison with fluorescence in situ hybridization and assessment of interobserver reproducibility.

Yun Gong1, Michael Gilcrease, Nour Sneige.   

Abstract

Accurate determination of HER-2 status is important in the management of patients with breast cancer, especially in determining their eligibility for trastuzumab therapy. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) has been regarded as the gold standard method for detecting HER-2 gene amplification. Recently, chromogenic in situ hybridization (CISH), in which HER-2 is detected by a peroxidase reaction and the gene copies are determined by regular bright-field microscopy, has emerged as a potential alternative to FISH. However, this method requires validation before it can be adopted into clinical practice. In this study, we evaluated 80 cases of invasive breast carcinoma by CISH, compared the results with those obtained by FISH, and assessed interobserver reproducibility among three observers. We found that agreement among the three pathologists on the CISH-determined HER-2 status was achieved in 73 cases (91%), all of which had results matching the corresponding FISH results: 54 nonamplified and 19 amplified. Of the 19 amplified cases, 13 were scored unanimously as high-level amplification; six had a minor scoring discrepancy (ie, low-level vs high-level amplification). A major scoring discrepancy (ie, nonamplification vs amplification) was found in the remaining seven cases, three of which were amplified and four of which were nonamplified by FISH. Two of the latter cases had a polysomy of chromosome 17. The cases that caused scoring difficulty were those with an equivocal or borderline signal number against a high background. Overall, there was nearly perfect agreement between the CISH and corresponding FISH results, and interpretation of CISH results were highly reproducible among the three pathologists. We conclude that, in general, HER-2 status can be reliably assessed by CISH. Confirmatory FISH is recommended in cases with equivocal or borderline CISH copy numbers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15861212     DOI: 10.1038/modpathol.3800432

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mod Pathol        ISSN: 0893-3952            Impact factor:   7.842


  11 in total

1.  Chromogenic in situ hybridisation (CISH) should be an accepted method in the routine diagnostic evaluation of HER2 status in breast cancer.

Authors:  S Di Palma; N Collins; C Faulkes; B Ping; G Ferns; B Haagsma; G Layer; M W Kissin; M G Cook
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2007-02-09       Impact factor: 3.411

2.  Epidermal growth factor receptor gene amplification in atypical adenomatous hyperplasia of the lung.

Authors:  Maria G McIntire; Sandro Santagata; Keith Ligon; Lucian R Chirieac
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2010-05-16       Impact factor: 4.060

3.  HER2 evaluation using the novel rabbit monoclonal antibody SP3 and CISH in tissue microarrays of invasive breast carcinomas.

Authors:  Sara Alexandra Vinhas Ricardo; Fernanda Milanezi; Sílvia Teresa Carvalho; Dina Raquel Aguilera Leitão; Fernando Carlos Lander Schmitt
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2006-12-08       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  Determination of HER2 amplification in primary breast cancer using dual-colour chromogenic in situ hybridization is comparable to fluorescence in situ hybridization: a European multicentre study involving 168 specimens.

Authors:  Tomás García-Caballero; Dorthe Grabau; Andrew R Green; John Gregory; Arno Schad; Elke Kohlwes; Ian O Ellis; Sarah Watts; Jens Mollerup
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 5.087

Review 5.  Out of the darkness and into the light: bright field in situ hybridisation for delineation of ERBB2 (HER2) status in breast carcinoma.

Authors:  Aaron M Gruver; Ziad Peerwani; Raymond R Tubbs
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  Testing for HER2 in Breast Cancer: A Continuing Evolution.

Authors:  Sejal Shah; Beiyun Chen
Journal:  Patholog Res Int       Date:  2010-12-06

7.  Her-2/neu testing and therapy in gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Cathy B Moelans; Paul J van Diest; Anya N A Milne; G Johan A Offerhaus
Journal:  Patholog Res Int       Date:  2010-12-06

8.  EGFR status in oral squamous cell carcinoma: comparing immunohistochemistry, FISH and CISH detection in a case series study.

Authors:  Vanessa Fátima Bernardes; Frederico Omar Gleber-Netto; Sílvia Ferreira de Sousa; Rafael Malagoli Rocha; Maria Cássia Ferreira de Aguiar
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2013-01-28       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  HER2 gene status in primary breast cancers and matched distant metastases.

Authors:  Coya Tapia; Spasenija Savic; Urs Wagner; René Schönegg; Hedvika Novotny; Bruno Grilli; Michelle Herzog; Audrey Devito Barascud; Inti Zlobec; Gieri Cathomas; Luigi Terracciano; Georg Feichter; Lukas Bubendorf
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 6.466

Review 10.  Chromogenic in situ hybridization compared with other approaches to evaluate HER2/neu status in breast carcinomas.

Authors:  F E Rosa; R M Santos; S R Rogatto; M A C Domingues
Journal:  Braz J Med Biol Res       Date:  2013-03-19       Impact factor: 2.590

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.