Literature DB >> 15861036

Vitamin D receptor genotypes influence the success of calcitriol therapy for recurrent vertebral fracture in osteoporosis.

Nigel A Morrison1, Peter M George, Tanya Vaughan, Murray W Tilyard, Chris M Frampton, Nigel L Gilchrist.   

Abstract

Osteoporosis is a complex multi-factorial disease where environment, diet and genetics play a role in determining susceptibility. Patients with existing vertebral fracture have a heightened risk of further recurrent vertebral fracture. The efficacy of new osteoporosis therapies is often compared to calcium supplementation. 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 (calcitriol) acts through the vitamin D receptor (VDR) and is effective at reducing recurrent vertebral fracture risk. Because the VDR controls calcium metabolism, we hypothesized that genetic variation at the VDR locus may influence response to both calcium and calcitriol therapy. Postmenopausal women with osteoporosis from a 3-year study comparing calcitriol versus calcium for prevention of vertebral fractures were genotyped for VDR alleles detected by FokI, BsmI, ApaI and TaqI. Data were analysed by hierarchical log-linear analysis and robust analysis of variance for relationships to fracture outcomes. Significant differences in the vertebral fracture rate in response to calcium therapy were observed between VDR genotypes (P<0.001). Calcium appeared to be equally effective as calcitriol in particular genotypes. The response to calcitriol therapy was most pronounced in patients carrying the TaqI t allele in combination with the FokI f initiation codon variant: f+t+ carriers were 11.3-fold less likely to sustain recurrent vertebral fracture in the last 2 years of the trial while on calcitriol therapy compared to calcium (P=1.4x10(-5)). Response to both calcium and calcitriol therapy is dependent on genetic variation at the VDR locus and two loci in the VDR gene may contribute to this effect.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15861036     DOI: 10.1097/01213011-200502000-00008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacogenet Genomics        ISSN: 1744-6872            Impact factor:   2.089


  16 in total

Review 1.  Pathogenesis of osteoporosis: concepts, conflicts, and prospects.

Authors:  Lawrence G Raisz
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 14.808

2.  Collaborative meta-analysis: associations of 150 candidate genes with osteoporosis and osteoporotic fracture.

Authors:  J Brent Richards; Fotini K Kavvoura; Fernando Rivadeneira; Unnur Styrkársdóttir; Karol Estrada; Bjarni V Halldórsson; Yi-Hsiang Hsu; M Carola Zillikens; Scott G Wilson; Benjamin H Mullin; Najaf Amin; Yurii S Aulchenko; L Adrienne Cupples; Panagiotis Deloukas; Serkalem Demissie; Albert Hofman; Augustine Kong; David Karasik; Joyce B van Meurs; Ben A Oostra; Huibert A P Pols; Gunnar Sigurdsson; Unnur Thorsteinsdottir; Nicole Soranzo; Frances M K Williams; Yanhua Zhou; Stuart H Ralston; Gudmar Thorleifsson; Cornelia M van Duijn; Douglas P Kiel; Kari Stefansson; André G Uitterlinden; John P A Ioannidis; Tim D Spector
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2009-10-20       Impact factor: 25.391

3.  Vitamin D status in relation to obesity, bone mineral density, bone turnover markers and vitamin D receptor genotypes in healthy Saudi pre- and postmenopausal women.

Authors:  M-S M Ardawi; M H Qari; A A Rouzi; A A Maimani; R M Raddadi
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2010-04-30       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  The relationship between vitamin D receptor (VDR) polymorphism and the occurrence of osteoporosis in menopausal Iranian women.

Authors:  Raheleh Dabirnia; Sanaz Mahmazi; Amirhossein Taromchi; Masoum Nikzad; Ehsan Saburi
Journal:  Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab       Date:  2017-02-10

5.  Genetic variants and associations of 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentrations with major clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Gregory P Levin; Cassianne Robinson-Cohen; Ian H de Boer; Denise K Houston; Kurt Lohman; Yongmei Liu; Stephen B Kritchevsky; Jane A Cauley; Toshiko Tanaka; Luigi Ferrucci; Stefania Bandinelli; Kushang V Patel; Emil Hagström; Karl Michaëlsson; Håkan Melhus; Thomas Wang; Myles Wolf; Bruce M Psaty; David Siscovick; Bryan Kestenbaum
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2012-11-14       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 6.  Inadequate responders to osteoporosis treatment: proposal for an operational definition.

Authors:  A Díez-Pérez; J González-Macías
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2008-06-11       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 7.  Very important pharmacogene summary for VDR.

Authors:  Audrey H Poon; Li Gong; Charlotte Brasch-Andersen; Augusto A Litonjua; Benjamin A Raby; Qutayba Hamid; Catherine Laprise; Scott T Weiss; Russ B Altman; Teri E Klein
Journal:  Pharmacogenet Genomics       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 2.089

8.  The osteoporosis revolution marches on.

Authors:  Lawrence G Raisz
Journal:  J Orthop Sci       Date:  2007-08-02       Impact factor: 1.601

9.  Glutamine repeat variants in human RUNX2 associated with decreased femoral neck BMD, broadband ultrasound attenuation and target gene transactivation.

Authors:  Nigel A Morrison; Alexandre A Stephens; Motomi Osato; Patsie Polly; Timothy C Tan; Namiko Yamashita; James D Doecke; Julie Pasco; Nicolette Fozzard; Graeme Jones; Stuart H Ralston; Philip N Sambrook; Richard L Prince; Geoff C Nicholson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-13       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Pharmacogenomics in osteoporosis: Steps toward personalized medicine.

Authors:  Robert Greene; Shaymaa S Mousa; Mohamed Ardawi; Mohamed Qari; Shaker A Mousa
Journal:  Pharmgenomics Pers Med       Date:  2009-09-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.