Douglas S Lee1, Ramachandran S Vasan. 1. National Heart, Lung and Blood Institutes, Framingham Heart Study, Framingham, MA 01702-5827, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This paper reviews recent advances in heart failure biomarkers for identification of disease precursors, subclinical disease, and onset or progression of overt disease. RECENT FINDINGS: Heart failure biomarkers can be categorized empirically as neurohormonal mediators, markers of myocyte injury and remodeling, and indicators of systemic inflammation. Brain natriuretic peptide is the most widely studied, with a potentially important but evolving role for determining prognosis and as a surrogate endpoint in clinical trials. Strong evidence exists for use of brain natriuretic peptide in the diagnosis of acute heart failure and for improved clinical outcomes with a brain natriuretic peptide-guided approach to heart failure care. The use of brain natriuretic peptide as a screening tool for asymptomatic left ventricular systolic dysfunction, or to distinguish systolic from diastolic heart failure, is not supported by current data. Markers of myocyte injury, including troponins, heart-type fatty acid binding protein, and myosin light chain-1, may further improve heart failure prognostication in conjunction with plasma brain natriuretic peptide. Biomarkers of matrix remodeling and inflammation have emerged as potential preclinical indicators to identify individuals at risk of developing clinical heart failure. A role for cellular adhesion molecules may also emerge in identifying those at risk for cardiovascular thrombotic complications, such as stroke. SUMMARY: The spectrum of heart failure biomarkers and their potential clinical applications continues to grow. Ongoing research on multimarker strategies will likely identify biomarker combinations that are optimal at various stages during the evolution of heart failure, ranging from their use for screening, diagnosis, determining prognosis, and guiding management.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This paper reviews recent advances in heart failure biomarkers for identification of disease precursors, subclinical disease, and onset or progression of overt disease. RECENT FINDINGS:Heart failure biomarkers can be categorized empirically as neurohormonal mediators, markers of myocyte injury and remodeling, and indicators of systemic inflammation. Brain natriuretic peptide is the most widely studied, with a potentially important but evolving role for determining prognosis and as a surrogate endpoint in clinical trials. Strong evidence exists for use of brain natriuretic peptide in the diagnosis of acute heart failure and for improved clinical outcomes with a brain natriuretic peptide-guided approach to heart failure care. The use of brain natriuretic peptide as a screening tool for asymptomatic left ventricular systolic dysfunction, or to distinguish systolic from diastolic heart failure, is not supported by current data. Markers of myocyte injury, including troponins, heart-type fatty acid binding protein, and myosin light chain-1, may further improve heart failure prognostication in conjunction with plasma brain natriuretic peptide. Biomarkers of matrix remodeling and inflammation have emerged as potential preclinical indicators to identify individuals at risk of developing clinical heart failure. A role for cellular adhesion molecules may also emerge in identifying those at risk for cardiovascular thrombotic complications, such as stroke. SUMMARY: The spectrum of heart failure biomarkers and their potential clinical applications continues to grow. Ongoing research on multimarker strategies will likely identify biomarker combinations that are optimal at various stages during the evolution of heart failure, ranging from their use for screening, diagnosis, determining prognosis, and guiding management.
Authors: Queen Henry-Okafor; Sean P Collins; Cathy A Jenkins; Karen F Miller; David J Maron; Allen J Naftilan; Neal Weintraub; Gregory J Fermann; John McPherson; Santosh Menon; Douglas B Sawyer; Alan B Storrow Journal: Open Biomark J Date: 2012-04-20
Authors: Fernando Friões; Patrícia Lourenço; Olga Laszczynska; Pedro-Bernardo Almeida; João-Tiago Guimarães; James L Januzzi; Ana Azevedo; Paulo Bettencourt Journal: Clin Res Cardiol Date: 2015-01-14 Impact factor: 5.460
Authors: Steven E Lipshultz; Melissa B Diamond; Vivian I Franco; Sanjeev Aggarwal; Kasey Leger; Maria Verônica Santos; Stephen E Sallan; Eric J Chow Journal: Paediatr Drugs Date: 2014-10 Impact factor: 3.022
Authors: Raghava S Velagaleti; Philimon Gona; Martin G Larson; Thomas J Wang; Daniel Levy; Emelia J Benjamin; Jacob Selhub; Paul F Jacques; James B Meigs; Geoffrey H Tofler; Ramachandran S Vasan Journal: Circulation Date: 2010-10-11 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Matthew S Freiberg; Chung-Chou H Chang; Melissa Skanderson; Olga V Patterson; Scott L DuVall; Cynthia A Brandt; Kaku A So-Armah; Ramachandran S Vasan; Kris Ann Oursler; John Gottdiener; Stephen Gottlieb; David Leaf; Maria Rodriguez-Barradas; Russell P Tracy; Cynthia L Gibert; David Rimland; Roger J Bedimo; Sheldon T Brown; Matthew Bidwell Goetz; Alberta Warner; Kristina Crothers; Hilary A Tindle; Charles Alcorn; Justin M Bachmann; Amy C Justice; Adeel A Butt Journal: JAMA Cardiol Date: 2017-05-01 Impact factor: 14.676
Authors: Michael Böhm; Adriaan A Voors; Jean-Marie Ketelslegers; Stephan H Schirmer; Eva Turgonyi; Peter Bramlage; Faiez Zannad Journal: Clin Res Cardiol Date: 2011-07-16 Impact factor: 5.460
Authors: Rosita Zakeri; S Jeson Sangaralingham; Sharon M Sandberg; Denise M Heublein; Christopher G Scott; John C Burnett Journal: JACC Heart Fail Date: 2013-04 Impact factor: 12.035