Literature DB >> 1586070

Inspiratory muscle work of breathing during flow-by, demand-flow, and continuous-flow systems in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

C S Sassoon1, R Lodia, C H Rheeman, J H Kuei, R W Light, C K Mahutte.   

Abstract

The effect of flow-by continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) in comparison with continuous-flow (CF) CPAP on inspiratory muscle work of breathing (WI) in intubated patients is not known. We hypothesized that WI during flow-by CPAP would be comparable with that during CF CPAP. In nine intubated male patients recovering from acute respiratory failure related to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, we compared the effects of flow-by, demand-flow, and CF CPAP on WI. We also evaluated the extent to which the addition of 5 cm H2O of pressure support to demand-flow CPAP (DF-PS5) decreases WI. At CPAP levels of zero and 8 cm H2O, flow-by, demand-flow, DF-PS5 were applied in random order followed by CF CPAP for 15 min each. WI (expressed as Joules per liter and Joules per minute), maximal airway pressure drop during inspiration (delta Paw), total lung resistance (RL), lung compliance (CL), and ventilatory variables were measured. At CPAP of zero cm H2O, WI with flow-by was comparable with CF CPAP, and significantly less than with demand-flow CPAP. At both CPAP of zero and 8 cm H2O, the addition of 5 cm H2O PS to demand-flow CPAP reduced WI significantly to a level comparable with that of flow-by CPAP. At both CPAP levels, delta Paw was the largest, with demand-flow CPAP. RL and CL were not significantly different between the different CPAP systems. We conclude that WI with flow-by CPAP is comparable with that with CF CPAP, and significantly less than with demand-flow CPAP.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1586070     DOI: 10.1164/ajrccm/145.5.1219

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Rev Respir Dis        ISSN: 0003-0805


  10 in total

Review 1.  Characteristics of the ventilator pressure- and flow-trigger variables.

Authors:  C S Sassoon; S E Gruer
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 2.  Consensus conference on mechanical ventilation--January 28-30, 1993 at Northbrook, Illinois, USA. Part I. European Society of Intensive Care Medicine, the ACCP and the SCCM.

Authors:  A S Slutsky
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 3.  Difficult weaning.

Authors:  F Lemaire
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 17.440

4.  Superimposed inspiratory work of the Siemens Servo 300 ventilator during continuous positive airway pressure.

Authors:  I K Tan; S B Bhatt; Y H Tam; T A Buckley; T E Oh
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 17.440

5.  Work of breathing, inspiratory flow response, and expiratory resistance during continuous positive airway pressure with the ventilators EVITA-2, EVITA-4 and SV 300.

Authors:  E Calzia; K H Lindner; W Stahl; A Martin; P Radermacher; M Georgieff
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 17.440

6.  Flow-triggering reduces inspiratory effort during weaning from mechanical ventilation.

Authors:  G Polese; A Massara; R Poggi; R Brandolese; G Brandi; A Rossi
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 17.440

7.  Effect of low-level PEEP on inspiratory work of breathing in intubated patients, both with healthy lungs and with COPD.

Authors:  M Sydow; W Golisch; H Buscher; J Zinserling; T A Crozier; H Burchardi
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 8.  Weaning from mechanical ventilation.

Authors:  I Alía; A Esteban
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2000-02-18       Impact factor: 9.097

9.  Does the tube-compensation function of two modern mechanical ventilators provide effective work of breathing relief?

Authors:  Yoshiko Maeda; Yuji Fujino; Akinori Uchiyama; Nobuyuki Taenaka; Takashi Mashimo; Masaji Nishimura
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2003-08-14       Impact factor: 9.097

Review 10.  Non-invasive ventilatory support and high-flow nasal oxygen as first-line treatment of acute hypoxemic respiratory failure and ARDS.

Authors:  Domenico Luca Grieco; Salvatore Maurizio Maggiore; Oriol Roca; Elena Spinelli; Bhakti K Patel; Arnaud W Thille; Carmen Sílvia V Barbas; Marina Garcia de Acilu; Salvatore Lucio Cutuli; Filippo Bongiovanni; Marcelo Amato; Jean-Pierre Frat; Tommaso Mauri; John P Kress; Jordi Mancebo; Massimo Antonelli
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2021-07-07       Impact factor: 17.440

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.