Literature DB >> 15860652

Differential acquisition of specific components of a classically conditioned arterial blood pressure response in rat.

Yasser M El-Wazir1, Sheng-Gang Li, Daniel T Williams, Aletia G Sprinkle, David R Brown, David C Randall.   

Abstract

Presenting a 15-s pulsed tone, the conditional stimulus (CS(+)), followed by 0.5-s tail shock, to a well-trained rat causes a sudden, but transient, pressor response (C(1)). Blood pressure (BP) then drops before increasing again (C(2)). A steady tone of the same frequency never followed by a shock (a discriminative stimulus, or CS(-)) evokes a C(1) but not a C(2) response. Experiment 1 tested the hypothesis that this BP response pattern does not depend on the nature of the tone (i.e., pulsed vs. steady) used for CS(+) and CS(-). The tones were reversed from the traditional paradigm, above, in nine rats. The C(1) BP increase for a steady-tone CS(+) (+4.8 +/- 1.9 mmHg, mean change +/- SE) and a pulsed CS(-) (+2.9 +/- 1.3 mmHg) did not differ. Conversely, C(2) showed a clear discrimination (CS(+): +5.1 +/- 1.2 mmHg, CS(-): +0 .7 +/- 0.8 mmHg; P < 0.05). Experiment 2 tested the hypothesis that the C(1) and C(2) BP responses first appear at different times during training. On training day 1, five 15-s pulsed tones (CS(+)) were presented to each of 18 rats; the last tone was followed by a tail shock. Likewise, five steady CS(-) tones never followed by shock were given. Training continued for 2 more days, with each CS(+) followed by shock. At the end of day 2, CS(+) evoked a C(1) BP response (+3.9 +/- 0.9 mmHg) but no C(2) (+0.6 +/- 0.4 mmHg, not significant vs. pretone). By the end of day 3, CS(+) evoked a significant (vs. baseline) C(1) (+7.3 +/- 1.4 mmHg) and C(2) (+3.3 +/- 0.8 mmHg). Conversely, although CS(-) evoked a C(1) response (3.5 +/- 1.3 mmHg), there was no C(2) (+0.7 +/- 0.5 mmHg; not significant). We conclude that 1) C(1) and C(2) are acquired at different rates, 2) early in training C(1) is an orienting response evoked by both tones, and 3) C(2) is only acquired as an animal learns to associate the CS(+) tone with shock. This suggests that C(1) and C(2) are controlled by different processes in the brain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15860652     DOI: 10.1152/ajpregu.00018.2005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol        ISSN: 0363-6119            Impact factor:   3.619


  4 in total

1.  Atomoxetine changes rat's HR response to stress from tachycardia to bradycardia via alterations in autonomic function.

Authors:  Winston Y Li; Shara E Strang; David R Brown; Re'gie Smith; Dennis L Silcox; Sheng-Gang Li; Bobby R Baldridge; K Paul Nesselroade; David C Randall
Journal:  Auton Neurosci       Date:  2009-12-16       Impact factor: 3.145

2.  Parasympathetic response to acute stress is attenuated in young Zucker obese rats.

Authors:  Yasser M El-Wazir; Sheng-Gang Li; Re'Gie Smith; Dennis L Silcox; David R Brown; David C Randall
Journal:  Auton Neurosci       Date:  2008-08-22       Impact factor: 3.145

3.  Longitudinal analysis of arterial blood pressure and heart rate response to acute behavioral stress in rats with type 1 diabetes mellitus and in age-matched controls.

Authors:  David C Randall; Richard O Speakman; Dennis L Silcox; Laura V Brown; David R Brown; Ming C Gong; Abhijit Patwardhan; L Raymond Reynolds; Dennis G Karounos; Don E Burgess; Chikodi N Anigbogu
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2011-08-27       Impact factor: 4.566

4.  Effects of perinatal oxycodone exposure on the cardiovascular response to acute stress in male rats at weaning and in young adulthood.

Authors:  Thitinart Sithisarn; Henrietta S Bada; Richard J Charnigo; Sandra J Legan; David C Randall
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2013-04-24       Impact factor: 4.566

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.