Literature DB >> 15860501

GnRH agonist versus GnRH antagonist in oocyte donation cycles: a prospective randomized study.

N Prapas1, Y Prapas, Y Panagiotidis, S Prapa, P Vanderzwalmen, R Schoysman, G Makedos.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The specific role of LH in folliculogenesis and oocyte maturation is unclear. GnRH antagonists, when administered in the late follicular phase, induce a sharp decrease in serum LH which may be detrimental for IVF outcome. This study was performed to evaluate whether the replacement of GnRH agonist (triptorelin) by a GnRH antagonist (ganirelix; NV Organon) in oocyte donation cycles has any impact on pregnancy and implantation rates.
METHODS: A total of 148 donor IVF cycles was randomly assigned to use either a GnRH antagonist daily administered from the 8th day of stimulation (group I) or a GnRH agonist long protocol (group II) for the ovarian stimulation of their donors. The primary endpoints were the pregnancy and the implantation rates.
RESULTS: The clinical pregnancy rate per transfer (39.72%, 29/73 versus 41.33%, 31/75) based on transvaginal scan findings at 7 weeks of gestation, the implantation rate (23.9 versus 25.4%) and the first trimester abortion rate (10.34 versus 12.90%) were similar in the two groups.
CONCLUSION: In oocyte donation cycles the replacement of GnRH agonist by a GnRH antagonist appears to have no impact on the pregnancy and implantation rates when its administration starts on day 8 of stimulation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15860501     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deh832

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  7 in total

1.  Implications of Blood Type for Ovarian Reserve and Infertility - Impact on Oocyte Yield in IVF Patients.

Authors:  D Spitzer; C Corn; J Stadler; B Wirleitner; M Schuff; P Vanderzwalmen; F Grabher; N H Zech
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 2.915

2.  Embryonic early-cleavage rate is decreased with aging in GnRH agonist but not inantagonist protocols.

Authors:  Wen-Jui Yang; Yu-Chyi Hwang; Chih-Sheng Lin; Yuh-Ming Hwu; Robert Kuo-Kuang Lee; Shun-Yu Hsiao
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2015-03-20       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Ovarian stimulation with GnRH analogues.

Authors:  Ivan S Montenegro; Mariana Faller; Isabel C A de Almeida; Eduardo P Passos
Journal:  JBRA Assist Reprod       Date:  2014-06-27

4.  Increased Uterine NK cell numbers and perforin expression during the implantation phase in IVF Cycles with GnRH Antagonist Protocol.

Authors:  Bufang Xu; Jingwen Wang; Lan Xia; Dan Zhang; Xian Wu; Aijun Zhang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-01-03       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 5.  Optimal usage of the GnRH antagonists: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Alan B Copperman; Claudio Benadiva
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2013-03-15       Impact factor: 5.211

6.  Early-cleavage is a reliable predictor for embryo implantation in the GnRH agonist protocols but not in the GnRH antagonist protocols.

Authors:  Wen-Jui Yang; Yuh-Ming Hwu; Robert Kuo-kuang Lee; Sheng-Hsiang Li; Steven Fleming
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2009-03-03       Impact factor: 5.211

7.  Outcome of cryopreserved-thawed embryo transfer in the GnRH agonist versus antagonist protocol.

Authors:  Maryam Eftekhar; Razieh Dehghani Firouzabadi; Hesamoddin Karimi; Elham Rahmani
Journal:  Iran J Reprod Med       Date:  2012-07
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.