Literature DB >> 15859965

Impact of faecal incontinence severity on health domains.

M Deutekom1, M P Terra, A C Dobben, M G W Dijkgraaf, C G M I Baeten, J Stoker, P M M Bossuyt.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Faecal incontinence is a problem that can have a major impact on the quality of life of those affected. Our aim was to relate the severity of faecal incontinence to the impact on several general health domains.
METHODS: Patients from a prospective diagnostic cohort study, performed in 16 medical centres in the Netherlands, were invited to the study. The severity of incontinence was determined with the Vaizey score, which ranges from 0 (continent) to 24 (totally incontinent). Based on their Vaizey score, patients were assigned to one of five severity categories. All patients completed the EuroQol-5D instrument, which evaluates the existence of problems on five health domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression.
RESULTS: Data from 259 consecutive patients (25 male) could be analysed. Their mean age was 59 years (SD +/- 12). The mean duration of faecal incontinence was 8.1 years (SD +/- 8). The proportion of patients reporting problems rose significantly with increasing severity of faecal incontinence in the domains of usual activities (ranging from 36% in the least severe group to 71% in the most severe group (P < 0.001)), pain/discomfort (ranging from 35% to 60%; P = 0.025), and anxiety/depression (ranging from 23% to 49%; P = 0.037). No significant trends could be observed in the domains of mobility and self-care.
CONCLUSION: There exists a significant relation between severity of incontinence and frequency of reported problems in the domains of usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15859965     DOI: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2005.00772.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 1462-8910            Impact factor:   3.788


  15 in total

1.  St. Mark's incontinence score for assessment of anal incontinence following obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS).

Authors:  Anne-Marie Roos; Abdul H Sultan; Ranee Thakar
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2008-12-12

Review 2.  The current role of imaging techniques in faecal incontinence.

Authors:  M P Terra; J Stoker
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-05-11       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Faecal incontinence and health related quality of life in inflammatory bowel disease patients: Findings from a tertiary care center in South Asia.

Authors:  Duminda Subasinghe; Navarathna Mudiyanselage Meththananda Navarathna; Dharmabandhu Nandadeva Samarasekera
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2016-08-06

4.  Epidemiology, pathophysiology, and classification of fecal incontinence: state of the science summary for the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK) workshop.

Authors:  Adil E Bharucha; Gena Dunivan; Patricia S Goode; Emily S Lukacz; Alayne D Markland; Catherine A Matthews; Louise Mott; Rebecca G Rogers; Alan R Zinsmeister; William E Whitehead; Satish S C Rao; Frank A Hamilton
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-12-23       Impact factor: 10.864

5.  Home electrical stimulation for women with fecal incontinence: a preliminary randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Nira Cohen-Zubary; Rachel Gingold-Belfer; Inna Lambort; Nir Wasserberg; Haim Krissi; Sigal Levy; Yaron Niv; Ram Dickman
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2015-01-27       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Impact of fecal incontinence on quality of life.

Authors:  Lynne Bartlett; Madeleine Nowak; Yik-Hong Ho
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-07-14       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  The bother of anal incontinence and St. Mark's Incontinence Score.

Authors:  C Paka; I K Atan; H P Dietz
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2015-11-16       Impact factor: 3.781

8.  Rehabilitation of fecal incontinence: what is the influence of anal sphincter lesions?

Authors:  F Pucciani; M Raggioli; R Gattai
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2012-10-31       Impact factor: 3.781

9.  Impact of anal incontinence on psychosocial function and health-related quality of life.

Authors:  Michael D Crowell; V Ann Schettler; Brian E Lacy; Tisha N Lunsford; Lucinda A Harris; John K DiBaise; Michael P Jones
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2007-01-09       Impact factor: 3.487

10.  A prospective non-randomized two-centre study of patients with passive faecal incontinence after birth trauma and patients with soiling after anal surgery, treated by elastomer implants versus rectal irrigation.

Authors:  S J van der Hagen; W van der Meer; P B Soeters; C G Baeten; W G van Gemert
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2012-05-11       Impact factor: 2.571

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.