Literature DB >> 15859612

Use of DNA repair enzymes in electrochemical detection of damage to DNA bases in vitro and in cells.

Katerina Cahová-Kucharíková1, Miroslav Fojta, Tomás Mozga, Emil Palecek.   

Abstract

Electrochemical measurements at mercury or solid amalgam electrodes offer a highly sensitive detection of DNA strand breaks. On the other hand, electrochemical detection of damage to DNA bases at any electrode is usually much less sensitive. In this paper, we propose a new voltammetric method for the detection of the DNA base damage based on enzymatic conversion of the damaged DNA bases to single-strand breaks (ssb), single-stranded (ss) DNA regions, or both. Supercoiled DNA exposed to UV light was specifically cleaved by T4 endonuclease V, an enzyme recognizing pyrimidine dimers, the major products of photochemical DNA damage. Apurinic sites (formed in dimethyl sulfate-modified DNA) were determined after treating the DNA with E. coli exonuclease III, an enzyme introducing ssb at the abasic sites and degrading one of the DNA strands. The ssb or ssDNA regions, or both, were detected by adsorptive transfer stripping alternating current voltammetry at the mercury electrode. This technique offers much better sensitivity and selectivity of DNA base damage detection than any other electrochemical method. It is not limited to DNA damage in vitro, but it can detect also DNA base damage induced in living bacterial cells.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15859612     DOI: 10.1021/ac048423x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anal Chem        ISSN: 0003-2700            Impact factor:   6.986


  5 in total

Review 1.  Metabolic toxicity screening using electrochemiluminescence arrays coupled with enzyme-DNA biocolloid reactors and liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Eli G Hvastkovs; John B Schenkman; James F Rusling
Journal:  Annu Rev Anal Chem (Palo Alto Calif)       Date:  2012-04-05       Impact factor: 10.745

2.  Using DNA devices to track anticancer drug activity.

Authors:  Dimithree Kahanda; Gaurab Chakrabarti; Marc A Mcwilliams; David A Boothman; Jason D Slinker
Journal:  Biosens Bioelectron       Date:  2016-02-12       Impact factor: 12.545

3.  Electrochemical detection of mismatched DNA using a MutS probe.

Authors:  Minseon Cho; Sohyun Lee; Se-Young Han; Jin-Young Park; Md Aminur Rahman; Yoon-Bo Shim; Changill Ban
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2006-06-13       Impact factor: 16.971

4.  Chromatin states modify network motifs contributing to cell-specific functions.

Authors:  Hongying Zhao; Tingting Liu; Ling Liu; Guanxiong Zhang; Lin Pang; Fulong Yu; Huihui Fan; Yanyan Ping; Li Wang; Chaohan Xu; Yun Xiao; Xia Li
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Controlled potential electro-oxidation of genomic DNA.

Authors:  Vytas Reipa; Donald H Atha; Sanem H Coskun; Christopher M Sims; Bryant C Nelson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-11       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.