Literature DB >> 15859531

Translation, adaptation and validation of the Shoulder Rating Questionnaire (SRQ) into the Dutch language.

Henricus M Vermeulen1, Dies C G Boonman, Hans M Schüller, Wim R Obermann, Hans C van Houwelingen, Piet M Rozing, Thea P M Vliet Vlieland.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To translate and adapt the original English version of the Shoulder Rating Questionnaire (SRQ) into the Dutch language (SRQ-DLV) and evaluate its internal consistency, reliability, validity and responsiveness to clinical changes.
DESIGN: Prospective study.
SETTING: Outpatient departments of orthopaedics, radiology and physical therapy of an academic and a non-academic hospital.
SUBJECTS: One hundred and seven patients treated for unilateral shoulder disorder (adhesive capsulitis 68, calcifying tendinitis 22, impingement syndrome or rotator cuff tear 17).
METHODS: The original SRQ was translated and adapted following international guidelines. The SRQ-DLV was used among other measures of body function and structure, activities and societal participation in order to determine reliability, internal consistency, validity and responsiveness. Assessments were done at baseline and three months after treatment, with the SRQ-DLV being re-administered within one week before the baseline measurement and the start of the treatment for testing reliability.
RESULTS: Cronbach's alpha for internal consistency was 0.89 for the total questionnaire and 0.81, 0.80, 0.72 and 0.84 for the domains pain, daily activities, sports/recreational activities and work, respectively. Test-retest reliability of the SRQ-DLV and its subscales ranged from 0.63 to 0.86. The summary score of the SRQ-DLV correlated with measures of shoulder function, daily activities and quality of life. Except for the work subscale of the SRQ-DLV, large effect sizes, reflecting its responsiveness to clinical changes after treatment, were found for both the summary and the subscales scores.
CONCLUSIONS: Empirical data support that the SRQ-DLV is a reliable, valid and responsive measure to be used in clinical trials including Dutch patients with various shoulder disorders.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15859531     DOI: 10.1191/0269215505cr811oa

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Rehabil        ISSN: 0269-2155            Impact factor:   3.477


  7 in total

1.  A new interdisciplinary treatment strategy versus usual medical care for the treatment of subacromial impingement syndrome: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Oscar Dorrestijn; Martin Stevens; Ron L Diercks; Klaas van der Meer; Jan C Winters
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2007-02-22       Impact factor: 2.362

Review 2.  Guideline for diagnosis and treatment of subacromial pain syndrome: a multidisciplinary review by the Dutch Orthopaedic Association.

Authors:  Ron Diercks; Carel Bron; Oscar Dorrestijn; Carel Meskers; René Naber; Tjerk de Ruiter; Jaap Willems; Jan Winters; Henk Jan van der Woude
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2014-05-21       Impact factor: 3.717

3.  NA-CONTROL: a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial to compare specific outpatient rehabilitation that targets cerebral mechanisms through relearning motor control and uses self-management strategies to improve functional capability of the upper extremity, to usual care in patients with neuralgic amyotrophy.

Authors:  Renee Lustenhouwer; Nens van Alfen; Ian G M Cameron; Ivan Toni; Alexander C H Geurts; Rick C Helmich; Baziel G M van Engelen; Jan T Groothuis
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2019-08-07       Impact factor: 2.279

4.  Reachable workspace analysis is a potential measurement for impairment of the upper extremity in neuralgic amyotrophy.

Authors:  Jos IJspeert; Renee Lustenhouwer; Renske M Janssen; Jay J Han; Maya N Hatch; Ian Cameron; Rick C Helmich; Baziel van Engelen; Philip van der Wees; Alexander C H Geurts; Nens van Alfen; Jan T Groothuis
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  2022-06-21       Impact factor: 3.852

Review 5.  How to Assess Shoulder Functionality: A Systematic Review of Existing Validated Outcome Measures.

Authors:  Rocio Aldon-Villegas; Carmen Ridao-Fernández; Dolores Torres-Enamorado; Gema Chamorro-Moriana
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-08

6.  Reliability, Validity, and Responsiveness of the Korean Version of the Shoulder Disability Questionnaire and Shoulder Rating Questionnaire.

Authors:  Yuseong Choi; Jong Wook Park; Sujin Noh; Min Su Kim; Yun Hee Park; Duk Hyun Sung
Journal:  Ann Rehabil Med       Date:  2015-10-26

Review 7.  Evaluation of measurement properties of self-administered PROMs aimed at patients with non-specific shoulder pain and "activity limitations": a systematic review.

Authors:  M Thoomes-de Graaf; G G M Scholten-Peeters; J M Schellingerhout; A M Bourne; R Buchbinder; M Koehorst; C B Terwee; A P Verhagen
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2016-04-02       Impact factor: 4.147

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.