K-B Tan1, T C Putti. 1. Department of Pathology, National University of Singapore, Lower Kent Ridge Road, Singapore 119074. pattankb@nus.edu.sg
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Cyclooxygenase 2 (COX-2), an inducible prostaglandin synthase, participates in inflammatory and neoplastic processes. It is expressed by various tumours and contributes to carcinogenesis. Notably, COX-2 inhibitors appear to have tumour suppressor effects and are being evaluated in clinical trials. AIMS: To investigate COX-2 expression in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), a common tumour in parts of Asia, and to discuss potential implications. METHODS: Eighty five cases of NPC were reviewed. COX-2 immunohistochemistry and semiquantitative assessment of expression in nasopharyngeal biopsies were performed. Because COX-2 is proangiogenic, tumour microvessel density was also assessed with the use of CD31 immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: Histologically, 78 NPCs were undifferentiated, six were non-keratinising, and one was keratinising. Thirty nine NPCs had adjacent dysplastic epithelium. COX-2 expression was noted in 60 NPCs, 14 of 39 samples of dysplastic epithelium, and only one of 25 samples of normal epithelium (p < 0.01). Microvessel density was not significantly different between COX-2 positive and COX-2 negative tumours (p = 0.774). Tumour COX-2 positivity was not associated with higher tumour stage (p = 0.423). CONCLUSION: COX-2 expression is more frequently seen as nasopharyngeal epithelium progresses from normal to dysplastic to carcinoma. This suggests that COX-2 contributes to the multistep process of NPC carcinogenesis. COX-2 represents a therapeutic target for COX-2 inhibitors, and there is thus a basis for the further investigation of this adjuvant treatment modality for NPC. COX-2 inhibitors are known to potentiate the antitumour effects of radiotherapy, which is the primary treatment for NPC.
BACKGROUND:Cyclooxygenase 2 (COX-2), an inducible prostaglandin synthase, participates in inflammatory and neoplastic processes. It is expressed by various tumours and contributes to carcinogenesis. Notably, COX-2 inhibitors appear to have tumour suppressor effects and are being evaluated in clinical trials. AIMS: To investigate COX-2 expression in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), a common tumour in parts of Asia, and to discuss potential implications. METHODS: Eighty five cases of NPC were reviewed. COX-2 immunohistochemistry and semiquantitative assessment of expression in nasopharyngeal biopsies were performed. Because COX-2 is proangiogenic, tumour microvessel density was also assessed with the use of CD31 immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: Histologically, 78 NPCs were undifferentiated, six were non-keratinising, and one was keratinising. Thirty nine NPCs had adjacent dysplastic epithelium. COX-2 expression was noted in 60 NPCs, 14 of 39 samples of dysplastic epithelium, and only one of 25 samples of normal epithelium (p < 0.01). Microvessel density was not significantly different between COX-2 positive and COX-2 negative tumours (p = 0.774). TumourCOX-2 positivity was not associated with higher tumour stage (p = 0.423). CONCLUSION:COX-2 expression is more frequently seen as nasopharyngeal epithelium progresses from normal to dysplastic to carcinoma. This suggests that COX-2 contributes to the multistep process of NPC carcinogenesis. COX-2 represents a therapeutic target for COX-2 inhibitors, and there is thus a basis for the further investigation of this adjuvant treatment modality for NPC. COX-2 inhibitors are known to potentiate the antitumour effects of radiotherapy, which is the primary treatment for NPC.
Authors: M Al-Sarraf; M LeBlanc; P G Giri; K K Fu; J Cooper; T Vuong; A A Forastiere; G Adams; W A Sakr; D E Schuller; J F Ensley Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 1998-04 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: A J Dannenberg; N K Altorki; J O Boyle; C Dang; L R Howe; B B Weksler; K Subbaramaiah Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2001-09 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: G Steinbach; P M Lynch; R K Phillips; M H Wallace; E Hawk; G B Gordon; N Wakabayashi; B Saunders; Y Shen; T Fujimura; L K Su; B Levin; L Godio; S Patterson; M A Rodriguez-Bigas; S L Jester; K L King; M Schumacher; J Abbruzzese; R N DuBois; W N Hittelman; S Zimmerman; J W Sherman; G Kelloff Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2000-06-29 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: J L Masferrer; K M Leahy; A T Koki; B S Zweifel; S L Settle; B M Woerner; D A Edwards; A G Flickinger; R J Moore; K Seibert Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2000-03-01 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: S Murono; H Inoue; T Tanabe; I Joab; T Yoshizaki; M Furukawa; J S Pagano Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2001-05-29 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Ari Ristimäki; Anna Sivula; Johan Lundin; Mikael Lundin; Tiina Salminen; Caj Haglund; Heikki Joensuu; Jorma Isola Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2002-02-01 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Susan Li Er Loong; Jacqueline Siok Gek Hwang; Hui Hua Li; Joseph Tien Seng Wee; Swee Peng Yap; Melvin Lee Kiang Chua; Kam Weng Fong; Terence Wee Kiat Tan Journal: Radiat Oncol Date: 2009-07-10 Impact factor: 3.481
Authors: D S Sanketh; Karuna Kumari; Roopa S Rao; Vanishree C Haragannavar; Sachin C Sarode; Gargi S Sarode; A Thirumal Raj; Shankargouda Patil Journal: J Oral Biol Craniofac Res Date: 2018-02-19