PURPOSE: To prospectively determine whether combined positron emission tomography (PET) and computed tomography (CT) is more accurate than either PET or CT alone in depicting malignant lesions in the head and neck. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Study was approved by the institutional review board, and patient informed consent was waived. Sixty-five consecutive patients (42 men, 23 women; age range, 43-83 years) known to have or suspected of having head and neck cancer were examined with combined PET/CT. CT was performed with intravenous administration of a contrast agent, and the CT data were used for attenuation correction. Each examination was interpreted in three ways: PET images in the absence of CT data, CT images in the absence of PET data, and fused PET/CT images. Probability of malignancy of each lesion was assigned a score by using a five-point scale. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses were performed by using biopsy, imaging, or clinical follow-up as the reference standard. The minimum follow-up was 6 months (range, 6-12 months). The results were additionally analyzed to assess the degree of radiologist confidence. RESULTS: Follow-up was available for 64 (98%) of 65 patients. ROC analyses demonstrated that PET/CT is significantly superior to PET or CT alone for depiction of malignancy in the head and neck (P < .05). In this series, PET/CT had a sensitivity of 98%, a specificity of 92%, and an accuracy of 94%. Radiologist confidence was substantially higher with the combined modality. CONCLUSION: Combined PET/CT is more accurate than PET or CT alone for the depiction of malignancy in the head and neck. Radiologist confidence is improved with the combined modality. (c) RSNA, 2005.
PURPOSE: To prospectively determine whether combined positron emission tomography (PET) and computed tomography (CT) is more accurate than either PET or CT alone in depicting malignant lesions in the head and neck. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Study was approved by the institutional review board, and patient informed consent was waived. Sixty-five consecutive patients (42 men, 23 women; age range, 43-83 years) known to have or suspected of having head and neck cancer were examined with combined PET/CT. CT was performed with intravenous administration of a contrast agent, and the CT data were used for attenuation correction. Each examination was interpreted in three ways: PET images in the absence of CT data, CT images in the absence of PET data, and fused PET/CT images. Probability of malignancy of each lesion was assigned a score by using a five-point scale. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses were performed by using biopsy, imaging, or clinical follow-up as the reference standard. The minimum follow-up was 6 months (range, 6-12 months). The results were additionally analyzed to assess the degree of radiologist confidence. RESULTS: Follow-up was available for 64 (98%) of 65 patients. ROC analyses demonstrated that PET/CT is significantly superior to PET or CT alone for depiction of malignancy in the head and neck (P < .05). In this series, PET/CT had a sensitivity of 98%, a specificity of 92%, and an accuracy of 94%. Radiologist confidence was substantially higher with the combined modality. CONCLUSION: Combined PET/CT is more accurate than PET or CT alone for the depiction of malignancy in the head and neck. Radiologist confidence is improved with the combined modality. (c) RSNA, 2005.
Authors: Enver Ozer; Barış Naiboğlu; Ryan Meacham; Cherie Ryoo; Amit Agrawal; David E Schuller Journal: Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol Date: 2012-01-15 Impact factor: 2.503
Authors: Patrick Veit-Haibach; Christopher Luczak; Isabel Wanke; Markus Fischer; Thomas Egelhof; Thomas Beyer; Gerlinde Dahmen; Andreas Bockisch; Sandra Rosenbaum; Gerald Antoch Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2007-08-24 Impact factor: 9.236