Literature DB >> 15857971

Visuospatial memory computations during whole-body rotations in roll.

S Van Pelt1, J A M Van Gisbergen, W P Medendorp.   

Abstract

We used a memory-saccade task to test whether the location of a target, briefly presented before a whole-body rotation in roll, is stored in egocentric or in allocentric coordinates. To make this distinction, we exploited the fact that subjects, when tilted sideways in darkness, make systematic errors when indicating the direction of gravity (an allocentric task) even though they have a veridical percept of their self-orientation in space. We hypothesized that if spatial memory is coded allocentrically, these distortions affect the coding of remembered targets and their readout after a body rotation. Alternatively, if coding is egocentric, updating for body rotation becomes essential and errors in performance should be related to the amount of intervening rotation. Subjects (n = 6) were tested making saccades to remembered world-fixed targets after passive body tilts. Initial and final tilt angle ranged between -120 degrees CCW and 120 degrees CW. The results showed that subjects made large systematic directional errors in their saccades (up to 90 degrees ). These errors did not occur in the absence of intervening body rotation, ruling out a memory degradation effect. Regression analysis showed that the errors were closely related to the amount of subjective allocentric distortion at both the initial and final tilt angle, rather than to the amount of intervening rotation. We conclude that the brain uses an allocentric reference frame, possibly gravity-based, to code visuospatial memories during whole-body tilts. This supports the notion that the brain can define information in multiple frames of reference, depending on sensory inputs and task demands.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15857971     DOI: 10.1152/jn.00018.2005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  8 in total

Review 1.  Spatial constancy mechanisms in motor control.

Authors:  W Pieter Medendorp
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2011-02-27       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 2.  Space physiology II: adaptation of the central nervous system to space flight--past, current, and future studies.

Authors:  Gilles Clément; Jennifer Thu Ngo-Anh
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2012-09-30       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  Spatiotopic coding during dynamic head tilt.

Authors:  Kyriaki Mikellidou; Marco Turi; David C Burr
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-11-30       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Body orientation contributes to modelling the effects of gravity for target interception in humans.

Authors:  Barbara La Scaleia; Francesco Lacquaniti; Myrka Zago
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2019-02-06       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 5.  A vestibular sensation: probabilistic approaches to spatial perception.

Authors:  Dora E Angelaki; Eliana M Klier; Lawrence H Snyder
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2009-11-25       Impact factor: 17.173

Review 6.  Spatial updating and the maintenance of visual constancy.

Authors:  E M Klier; D E Angelaki
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2008-08-22       Impact factor: 3.590

7.  Direction-dependent arm kinematics reveal optimal integration of gravity cues.

Authors:  Jeremie Gaveau; Bastien Berret; Dora E Angelaki; Charalambos Papaxanthis
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2016-11-02       Impact factor: 8.140

8.  How Tilting the Head Interferes With Eye-Hand Coordination: The Role of Gravity in Visuo-Proprioceptive, Cross-Modal Sensory Transformations.

Authors:  Jules Bernard-Espina; Daniele Dal Canto; Mathieu Beraneck; Joseph McIntyre; Michele Tagliabue
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2022-03-10
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.